Connect with us

Media

Thailand Commercial Shames America’s Christians

Published

on

True Corporation Public Company Limited (TRUE) happens to be a huge communication conglomerate in Thailand.  TRUE operates the country’s largest cable TV provider, largest ISP internet service and the third largest mobile phone service.  They also have a partnership with Verizon, who most of us are familiar with.
Recently, TRUE made a commercial called ‘Giving.’  The message of the commercial is believing in the power of giving without expecting anything in return.  The commercial has been receiving rave reviews from all over the world.  Grab a tissue and watch.

After watching the commercial, I was curious to find out exactly what the predominant religion of Thailand is.  I discovered that the Thai national religion is Theravada Buddhism.  It is a mixture of Buddhism, ancient Hindu, some animism and ancient ancestor worship.  That’s when it dawned on me that the message of the video, most likely Theravada Buddhist in inspiration, puts America’s Christians to shame.
In addition to loving God with all your heart, soul and spirit, loving one another is perhaps one of the most important aspects of Christianity.  I don’t mean loving one another as our secular society would portray it, but to love one another sacrificially as Christ loved us.  Christ gave everything including His life for us because he loves us.  Christians should be willing to give sacrificially to others as well.
Not long ago, my wife and I were out of work and in danger of losing everything we owned.  A couple of friends and former co-workers gave us several thousand dollars to help keep our house and pay bills until we could find jobs.  The only thing they asked was to pay it forward.  We’re now on our feet and have helped out others as they helped us.  I don’t know if they gave sacrificially, but they gave in our time of dire need and expected nothing in return and we are forever grateful to them for their help.
It reminds me of the true account of William (Billy) Borden, heir to the Borden family business.  Born in 1887, Billy grew up surrounded by the wealth of his family’s business.  He graduated from Yale University in 1909 and then attended Princeton Theological Seminary.  At age 25, and against his family’s wishes, Billy felt called to be a missionary to the Muslims in northern China.  In doing so, he renounced his family’s fortune and accepted the meager life of a missionary.  He traveled to Egypt for his training and while there, he contracted cerebral meningitis and died.
After his death, his few belongings were shipped back to his parents.  When they opened up his Bible, they found were Billy had written ‘No Reserve’ and dated it at the time he gave up his family’s wealth.  Then Billy had written ‘No Retreat’ and dated it just after his father told him he would never allow Billy to work in the family business because of his decision to be a missionary.  Finally, Billy wrote ‘No Regrets’ shortly before he died.  Billy’s epitaph reads:

“A man in Christ He arose and forsook all and followed Him, Kindly affectioned with brotherly love, Fervent in spirit serving the Lord, Rejoicing in hope, Patient in tribulation, Instant in prayer, Communicating to the necessity of saints, In honour preferring others, Apart from faith in Christ, There is no explanation for such a life.”

Billy sacrificed everything for his calling to serve Christ and expected nothing in return.  Yet his story has inspired countless numbers of others to enter the mission field.  A book was later written about the life of William (Billy) Borden called No Retreats, No Reserves, No Regrets and is excellent reading.
I was also reminded of some of the families I’ve seen on Extreme Home Makeover over the past few years.  Several families were giving so much to those in need that their own homes were literally falling apart around them, but they didn’t stop giving through it all.  In some of the cases, it was the people they helped that contacted the show and got them to come and build the family a new home.  Those families were rewarded for sacrificially giving to others at the cost of their own wellbeing.
Some Christians in America do live up to this and they generally are involved in some sort of missions work providing meals, housing, clothing, medicine, etc. to the needy.  But by enlarge, most of the people in America today who call themselves Christians rarely give sacrificially to those in need, without any concern of getting it back.
What I see in the vast majority of Christians in America today is that they are not willing to give sacrificially to help others.  They are more concerned with their own needs and comforts than they are about the needs of others.  The lesson presented in the video commercial, most likely created by Buddhists, shames most American Christians and should be a wakeup call for us to help each other.  If America’s Christians lived a true Christian life and gave sacrificially, we would have little need for all of the government welfare, food stamps and other assistance programs.
Let me ask you, when was the last time you gave sacrificially to help someone in need?  Are you willing to give up your time in front of the TV to spend with someone who is alone or needs help with their house and yard work?  Are you willing to take some of your clothes and give them to others who are cold or can’t afford to buy their own?  Are you willing to give of your profits, as the owner of the restaurant in the Thai commercial to help those who are hungry?  Are you willing to take an elderly person to the doctor and stay there with them because they have no one else to turn to?
Take a moment to honestly reflect on the video commercial, what I’ve asked and on Mark 12:41-44:

“And he sat down opposite the treasury and watched the people putting money into the offering box. Many rich people put in large sums. And a poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which make a penny. And he called his disciples to him and said to them, ‘Truly, I say to you, this poor widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the offering box. For they all contributed out of their abundance, but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on.’”

Trending: Maryland Biden Supporter Fires Shots at Two Men in Truck with Trump Flag

Who do you think will be rewarded more in heaven, those that gave out of their abundance or the widow who gave sacrificially?

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Media

ABC Busts Biden Campaign For Raising Taxes On Middle And Lower Class

ABC caught red-handed doing actual journalism.

Published

on

By

ABC Busts Joe Biden For Raising Taxes On Middle And Lower Class

ABC News’ Jonathan Karl confronts Biden campaign co-chairman Democrat Rep. Cedric Richmond: “Sen. Harris said that she wanted to repeal the Trump tax cuts on day one…that does raise taxes on middle-income earners”

ABC’s Jon Karl asked Biden campaign co-chair Rep. Cedric Richmond (D-LA), almost apologetically, but he still asked, doesn’t Biden’s plan obviously raise taxes on most Americans if you repeal the Trump tax cuts? Not just those making more than $400,000?

Biden campaign co-chairman responded that’s our “goal” but “on day 1” you’ll see our plan.

From ATR:

A repeal of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act would impose a large tax increase on the American people. Thanks to the tax cuts, a typical family of four earning the median family income of $73,000 saw a tax cut of over $2,000– a 58% reduction in federal taxes. A single parent with one child with annual income of $41,000 saw a tax cut of $1,304 — a 73% reduction in federal taxes.

As noted by the New York Times: “Most people got a tax cut.” The NYT also stated: “To a large degree, the gap between perception and reality on the tax cuts appears to flow from a sustained — and misleading — effort by liberal opponents of the law to brand it as a broad middle-class tax increase.” Biden is a key part of this misleading effort.

Biden also repeated a lie he made during his campaign kickoff speech, claiming only high-income households received a tax cut. The Washington Post gave this claim four Pinocchios, noting it was “clearly false.” The Post also stated: “Most Americans received a tax cut.”

Democrats think that the lesson learned from Nancy Pelosi’s famous: “We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it” quote was that America bought it hook line and sinker. He will raise everyone’s taxes. We’re not stupid.

Continue Reading

Culture

CNN Analyst And Former FBI Agent “We Have A Biological Terrorist In The White House”

Published

on

By

CNN Analyst And Former FBI Agent “We Have A Biological Terrorist In The White House”

Asha Rangappa, an analyst for CNN and a former FBI special agent tweeted: “We have a biological terrorist in the White House.” This follows President Trump’s return to the White House on Monday evening after treatment for the Coronavirus.

Defending her claim, Asha Rangappa cited a Justice Department memo stating back in March that the novel Coronavirus “appears to meet the statutory definition of a biological agent” and that those who engage in the “purposeful exposure and infections of others” could be charged for terrorism-related offenses.

While there are allegations that he knew about his positive diagnosis significantly earlier than he had announced it on Thursday evening, there is no certifiable evidence that he knowingly exposed officials and staffers to the virus.

Twitter took aim!

Vile Democrats joined in with her:

Continue Reading

Media

Major Newspapers Assign Top Reporters To Update Trump’s Obituary

Ghouls!

Published

on

By

The New York Times’ Ben Smith says top reporters at three of the major newspapers in the nation, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Los Angeles Times have been assigned to update President Donald Trump’s obituary, according to TDW.

Those reporters include Peter Baker at The New York Times, Marc Fisher at The Washington Post and Mark Z. Barabak at The Los Angeles Times, Smith claimed people from the various papers confirmed to him.

Smith noted of the “reporters arrayed at Walter Reed military hospital on Sunday” that “the White House press corps is working with admirable aggression and openness. We need to know who is in charge of the government, and to understand the outcome of President Trump’s long evasion of the coronavirus crisis as Americans begin to vote.”

Dr. Mark Fisher, a professor of neurology and political science at the University of California, Irvine, told Smith, “It will help if reporters are medically knowledgeable, and ask the right questions, e.g. blood pressure, heart rhythm, sleep disorders. The more specific and precise questions reporters ask, the better. A robust fund of knowledge by the reporter is a great advantage.”

The major newspapers preparing their obituaries for Trump’s possible death may likely be premature; on Saturday evening White House physician Sean Conley, D.O., released a statement on President Trump’s health which indicated he had improved significantly since he had been diagnosed with COVID-19. More

How can this possibly be true‽ Top reporters don’t work for The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Los Angeles Times! The MSM has a significant case of Stage 4 TDS.

Continue Reading

Media

Leftists Go Nuts Over Trump Taking Short Ride Outside Walter Reed Medical Center

Published

on

By

Leftists Go Nuts Over Trump Taking Short Ride Outside Walter Reed Medical Center

Leftist MSM personalities took to Twitter following President Trump temporarily leaving Walter Reed Medical Center and taking a short drive to see his supporters who were outside showing their excitement for the president.

The most distinguished hit came from Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin, who went on a rant and called for the Maryland Attorney General to “indict Trump for reckless endangerment” and “assault.”

CBS News reporter David Begnaud complained that the president appeared to not wear the correct type of mask.

Elizabeth Landers a reporter for Vice News claimed that a Secret Service agent told her that Trump’s actions were “so reckless and careless and heartless.”

Continue Reading

Media

Trump Tax Return Hit Piece Fact Checks Itself: He Paid $1 Million in 2016 and $4.2 Million in 2017 to US Treasury

Published

on

By

The New York Times just published a so-called “bombshell” report on the president’s taxes, where they claimed Trump only paid $750 in federal income taxes for 2016 and 2017. Of course, the rest of the MSM has taken this and ran with it.

The MSM everywhere are pushing the story of Trump only paying $750 in taxes as 100% fact, but unfortunately, they’re missing an immense part of the equation.

TWJ:

The New York Times never lets the facts get in the way of a good story – it just buries them so far down no one will see.

Then it buries its own credibility, too.

That was the case Sunday when the most biased “news” organization in the country published its latest in-kind donation to the Democratic Party in the form of a nearly 10,000-word account of President Donald Trump’s income tax history, deliberately written to cast Trump as a villain to hard-working, taxpaying Americans.

But one key fact buried by The Times gives the game away on how misleading the article actually was.

The so-called “newspaper of record” started out the article with sentences apparently aimed at Everyman: It didn’t talk in billions or millions of dollars, figures most Americans don’t deal with on a regular basis (even Times readers).

Under the ominous headline “Long-Concealed Records Show Trump’s Chronic Losses and Years of Tax Avoidance,” it claimed that a billionaire who became president of the United States had “paid $750 in federal income taxes the year he won the presidency. In his first year in the White House, he paid another $750.”

That’s in the lede. The first sentence of a story that should set the tone for everything that follows. More

There is no wonder why President Donald Trump has to use Twitter to get his truth out! The Garbage times and other rags, never tell the truth!

Continue Reading

Democrats

Feminist Journalist Crank: Amy Coney Barrett Is “Weaponizing Her White Womanhood”

Like clockwork.

Published

on

By

Demented Liberal Fixates On Amy Coney Barrett’s Children

As reported by Newsbusters, Christine Grimaldi of Rewire News Group put her tweets on “protected” status after severe online backlash.

“This whole press conference is a display of Amy Coney Barrett weaponizing her white womanhood to grab whatever power managed to slip through the cracks in the Trump administration’s unrelenting misogyny,” tweeted Grimaldi.

“Trump and Barrett using her black children and child with down syndrome to score political points isn’t surprising, but it’s no less appalling,” she continued. “CNN keeps going on and on about Barrett’s family as if that makes her qualified to serve on the Supreme Court, and a whopping three years as a Trump-appointed federal judge, as if that’s enough to qualify for a lifetime on the Supreme Court.”

TDW:

Liberals are throwing everything and the kitchen sink at Judge Amy Coney Barrett in the race to keep her off the Supreme Court. After an “anti-racist” author referred to her as a “white colonizer” for adopting two black children from Haiti, feminist journalist Christine Grimaldi of Rewire News Group claimed that Barrett is “weaponizing her white womanhood.”

In a series of angry tweets on Saturday, while Barrett was accepting her nomination to the Supreme Court, Grimaldi claimed that Barrett was actually using her black children as props to gain political points. More

Continue Reading

Media

CNN Asks If The U.S. Military Can Intervene If Trump Doesn’t Leave Office

I love how they are asking President Trump this question when it was Democrats who actually said they would not concede.

Published

on

By

CNN Asks If The U.S. Military Can Intervene If Trump Doesn’t Leave Office

H.R. McMaster laughed in CNN’s Wolf Blitzer face when he asked a ridiculous question: “It’s so worrisome, indeed. And General, if the President were to lose the election on November 3rd, and if he were to refuse to concede — this is a hypothetical, but you’re a military guy — what role would the U.S. military have to play in that type of scenario?”

“Absolutely no role, Wolf,” H.R. McMaster firmly replied with a chuckle. “And those who suggest that the military would have any role in transition — they are being equally irresponsible.”

He invoked George Washington, who he credited for establishing a “very bold line between the military and politics” during the nation’s founding.

“The military should have nothing to do with partisan politics and nothing to do with any talk — any talk — about a transition between administrations,” McMaster told Blitzer.

“And the fact that we even have to ask a question like that is so worrisome in and of itself,” Blitzer defended his question. “I never thought I would have to ask if the U.S. military were to have to get involved in dealing with this.”

Twitter weighs in:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider


Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
 
Send this to a friend