Connect with us


State Dept. ‘Finds’ More Clinton ‘Lost’ Emails in FBI’s Hands

More proof of how corrupt Obama’s FBI is, the State Department just “found” a stack of Hillary Clinton’s “lost” emails in the hands of the FBI.



More proof of how corrupt Obama’s FBI is, the State Department just “found” a stack of Hillary Clinton’s “lost” emails in the hands of the FBI.

I say that Obama’s FBI is corrupt — not was– because the upper echelon of the agency is still filled with the traitors that Obama put in place to destroy it. And Hillary Clinton is just one of the lucky, lucky recipients of Obama’s efforts to lay cover for criminal actions.

Now, thanks to the continued pressure of government watchdog group Judicial Watch, the State Dept. has miraculously “found” more of Hillary’s criminal emails.

The new cache of emails comes after the feds claimed there were no more.

Trending: Van Jones Praises Trump, ‘Doesn’t Get Enough Credit’ For ‘Good Stuff He Has Done For Black Community’

Per Judicial Watch:

We released 80 pages of emails that further document how former Secretary of State Clinton used her unsecure, non-government email system to transmit classified and other sensitive government information.

There are 11 new Clinton emails. The emails include one sent by Clinton a month after the Benghazi terrorist attack referencing a “Benghazi security” issue. The emails also include talking points, which are redacted, for a meeting with President Obama.

The latest number of pages is the second batch of Clinton emails the FBI accidentally “found.”

The State Department previously claimed it had produced all releasable Clinton emails, including emails recovered by the FBI that Clinton tried to destroy or withhold. The State Department initially claimed all responsive emails had been produced in 2018, but then found more emails, which were produced for the first time early this year.

Click on over to Judicial Watch’s report on the emails for a detailed list of what is in them.

But this is just more proof of how Obama corrupted and ruined many of our once most-trusted institutions.

The FBI used to be a law enforcement agency and one of the premiere investigators in the nation. Obama turned them into a biased, corrupt arm of the Democrat Party. And they still are.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.



Bombshell New Evidence Links Hillary Clinton to Russian Hoax ‘Plan to Frame’ Trump for ‘Collusion’

On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe declassified a bombshell letter that links Hillary Clinton to the Russia collusion hoax.



On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe declassified a bombshell letter that links Hillary Clinton to Russia’s hoax claim that Trump “colluded” with them ahead of the 2016 election.

Ratcliffe’s declassified documents say a Russian source said that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign created a plan in July 2016 to frame then-candidate Donald Trump for Russian hacking of America’s electoral system.

The documents do prove conclusively that from the very beginning of the hoax, the FBI knew its anti-Trump investigation was based solely on a Russian disinformation campaign. Brennan and Comey were personally warned that this was true.

But instead of informing superiors and the FISA courts that their case against Trump was tainted by fake information planted by America’s enemy, the Obama FBI fabricated more fake evidence to attack Trump.

Per Breitbart News:

It states that in late July 2016 — at the time that Wikileaks released emails from the Democratic National Committee server, right before the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania — the U.S. became aware that Russian intelligence alleged “that U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee.” The U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) did not know if it was true.

Ratcliffe adds that then-CIA Director John Brennan briefed President Barack Obama “and other senior national security officials” about the Russian intelligence. That apparently included an “alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”
Finally, Ratcliffe notes that U.S. intelligence officials made an “investigative referral” to then-FBI Director James Comey and agent Peter Strzok — who was Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence — about Hillary Clinton’s alleged approval of a plan to frame Trump for Russian hacking as a way of distracting attention from her e-mail scandal. (Clinton had used an illicit, unsecured private server for government emails, some of which included classified information. It was then destroyed.)

What is also known as a fact, according to these documents, is that the Clinton campaign deliberately and publicly accused of Russia of trying to help Trump — both before and after the election — when they knew for a fact that it was not true.

It was a hoax since day one. Clinton knew it and so did Obama’s crooked FBI.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading


John Yoo: Dropping Charges Against Michael Flynn Only the First Move to Cleanup DOJ

John Yoo is celebrating the end of the DOJ’s case against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, but it is only the first step in cleaning up Obama’s corrupt FBI.



Former Dep. Asst. Attny. General John Yoo is celebrating the end of the DOJ’s case against Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, but he says it is only the first step in cleaning up Obama’s corrupt FBI and DOJ.

Yoo, who was the Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice during George W. Bush’s presidency, said that dropping the case was the right move because the “shenanigans by people whom the Trump administration has since fired or have resigned justified the extraordinary step of letting Flynn go.”

Dropping the charges against Flynn are just a start.

“Dropping the charges against the former national security adviser, like the firing of James Comey as FBI director and the removal of his circle of aides,” Yoo wrote, “is an important step in restoring control over a law enforcement agency that believed it had a right to pick and choose who were acceptable leaders for our nation rather than respecting the electoral process.”

Yoo slammed the FBI’s “perjury trap” it set for Flynn.

“It is not the job of federal prosecutors to try to prosecute everyone who may be lying about something — if that were the standard,” Yo said, “the FBI would have its hands full just in Washington, D.C., policing our elected politicians. Instead, the FBI should only charge witnesses for lying when it is “material” to the investigation of some other crime. The released note of an FBI official preparing for the Flynn interview asked if agents should “get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired.” There is no mention of investigating any true substantive crime.”

Yoo went on to say that the FBI did not have even the smallest bit of evidence that Flynn committed any crimes.

But the FBI’s corrupt interview with Flynn proves that the agency was the one up to criminal activity.

The FBI’s wrongdoing is also strongly supported by the highly suspect means it used to conduct the interview. The agents began the interview under the fiction that they were meeting with Flynn to discuss a business matter in his role as national security adviser, on his first day on the job, which would have been normal. But the FBI did not notify White House counsel to be present, as required by White House-DOJ rules, and bureau lawyer Lisa Page advised slipping in warnings for the witness’ rights unobtrusively. And Flynn did not ask for any counsel. Comey later boasted that he could never have gotten away with this in a more organized administration.

Why did the FBI engage in such lengths? Even after all these shenanigans, the FBI agents concluded that Flynn had not lied. The bureau’s leadership revealed their true intentions when they decided to keep the probe open and ultimately handed it over to Robert Mueller’s investigation. Flynn just became a pawn in the broader effort by Comey and Mueller to investigate the claim that Trump had conspired against Russia.

Yoo concludes saying that Mueller, Comey and the rest of the corrupt Obama crew had a different motive than getting to the truth. Their goal was no less than overturning the 2016 election and cashiering a sitting U.S. president purely for corrupt, let-wing reasons.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Send this to a friend