Connect with us

National Security

Sec. of State Pompeo Says Trump Admin. Forced to Clean Up Obama’s ‘Iran Mess’

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the Trump administration is working to recover from the “mess” the Obama administration created in Iran.

Published

on

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told the Sunday morning shows that the Trump administration is working hard to recover from the “mess” the Obama administration created in Iran.

Pompeo told the host of ABC’s This Week that the Trump administration has inherited the worst of all worlds in Iran.

During the Sunday broadcast, host George Stephanopoulos asked Pompeo if Trump intended to seek congressional authorization for any further military action in Iran.

Stephanopoulos then went to a video clip of former Vice-President Joe Biden attacking Trump for his missile strike on Iranian terror general Qassem Suleimani.

Trending: Mediaite Claims Trump Told ‘Dangerous Lie’ About Northam's Infanticide Comment, But Here’s Video Proof

“I’m going to make it clear. President Trump has no authority to take us to a military conflict with Iran, period,” Biden said on the clip. “The bottom line is any further action against Iran requires congressional authorization.”

This is all untrue, of course.

But Stephanopoulos then pressed Pompeo on the possibility of the Trump administration going to Congress for permission to launch any other attacks on Iran.

In reply, Pompeo lashed out at Biden.

“Boy, it’s really something to hear the vice-president from the previous administration be critical of this administration’s policy of Iran,” Pompeo said. “We’re having to clean up their mess, George. We’ll do everything required under the law to bring us into compliance with all the relevant constitutional legal provisions with respect to our duties to the legislative branch.”

“We have all the authority we need to do what we’ve done to date,” Pompeo concluded. “We will continue to do things appropriately, lawfully, and constitutionally. George, we’ve been consistent about that. There’s no reason to expect we’d do anything different going forward.”

In any case, Joe Biden is a total hypocrite on the issue. He previously gave cover to Obama and claimed the president didn’t need congressional approval to bomb terrorists. In 2008, Biden said that Obama would have the authority to strike to thwart an “imminent attack” on the U.S.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement

Democrats

The Speaker and the Ayatollah: Kindred Spirits

Published

on

There are some stunning, but not surprising, similarities between two of Donald Trump’s (and America’s) greatest enemies – Iran and the Democratic Party.  Not only do they hate the President of the United States, they have both tried to take him down and both have failed miserably. (more…)

Continue Reading

National Security

Obama DHS Sec. Jeh Johnson Says Trump Had ‘Ample Domestic Legal Authority’ For Soleimani Strike, Didn’t Need Congressional Approval

Game over, Democrats.

Published

on

This morning, Obama DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson obliterated Democrats’ talking points that Congress needed to approve the Soleimani strike.

“If you believe everything our government is saying about General Soleimani, he was a lawful military objective and the president, under his Constitutional authority as commander-in-chief, had ample domestic legal authority to take him out without additional Congressional authorization,” Johnson explained. “Whether he was a terrorist or a general in a military force that was engaged in armed attacks against our people, he was a lawful military objective.”

Townhall reports:

Since the United States carried out an airstrike last week that killed Iranian terrorist Qasem Soleimani, Democrats have repeatedly taken issue with the fact that the Trump administration didn’t ask for Congressional approval. President Barack Obama’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Jeh Johnson completely debunked that notion during a Sunday morning interview with MSNBC’s Chuck Todd on “Meet the Press.” More

Twitchy:

Jeh Johnson, DHS secretary under Barack Obama, said on “Meet the Press” this morning that President Trump had “ample domestic legal authority” to launch the attack on Iranian General Qassem Soleimani and that he didn’t need “an additional congressional authorization.”

And this attack on Johnson is disgusting. They’re insinuating that since he’s on the board of Lockheed Martin he’ll personally profit from war with Iran? More

In other words, the media and Democrats have been lying for the last three days about President Donald Trump’s authority to use military force.

Continue Reading

National Security

President Trump Explains His Decision To Strike Iran’s Qasem Soleimani

They attacked us and we responded. End of discussion.

Published

on

President Trump ordered an airstrike in Baghdad that killed Major General Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran’s elite Quds military force and one of the most powerful figures in the Islamic Republic.

“General Qassem Soleimani has killed or badly wounded thousands of Americans over an extended period of time, and was plotting to kill many more…but got caught! He was directly and indirectly responsible for the death of millions of people, including the recent large number of PROTESTERS killed in Iran itself,” Trump tweeted. “While Iran will never be able to properly admit it, Soleimani was both hated and feared within the country.”

Daily Caller:

President Donald Trump explained in a series of tweets Friday why the U.S. opted to strike top Iranian military leader Qasem Soleimani, accusing the general of plotting to kill Americans.

The Pentagon confirmed Thursday night that the U.S. was behind a drone strike that killed Soleimani, the leader of Iran’s elite Quds Force, in Iraq. The president had yet to personally speak about the news last night, instead opting to tweet an image of an American flag.

It wasn’t until Friday morning that Trump explained his decision to order the strike. More

Unlike Barack Obama, Donald Trump was not afraid to pull the trigger and he wouldn’t be coddling Iran. It feels great to have a President who has the courage to take out our enemies and do what is best for our national security! And it is true, the people of Iran hate the leadership of their nation.

Continue Reading

Foreign Policy

OSINT: “We Are In Deep Trouble”

Published

on

A friend, probably the foremost practitioner of open source intelligence (OSINT), has been developing his craft for over 40 years. He has created nearly 1,500 search engines to comb through the internet, including the Deep and Dark webs and millions of online resources resident OPENLY on networks around the world.

He does no hacking, trolling, phishing or engages in any illegal or even questionable practices or techniques to obtain data. Everything he collects is obtained from sources resident on open and active networks and without expectations of privacy.

Advanced software allows the machine translation of 85 languages and his team has developed extraordinary decryption programs. His programming expertise has created algorithms to conduct machine analysis and computations that turns data into knowledge.

He sent me the following. What he says is fascinating, educational and a little frightening. It is important – critical – to understand this information is neither classified nor obtained by classified intelligence techniques. And I agree with his conclusions.

_________________________________________________

I am sitting here looking at our OSINT analysis, simulations and forecasts — and realize that we are in deep trouble!

  • Russia is now able to take over the Middle East and control a large percentage of the world´s known oil reserves
  • Our analysis suggests that Russia will soon have a naval base in the Gulf.
  • China is expanding rapidly in SE Asia
  • North Korea continues to build missile and nuclear warheads
  • Iran keeps on supporting terrorist groups
  • The Taliban will soon control all of Afghanistan, and we have spent trillions of dollars and many lives for nothing
  • ISIS are expanding in Asia and in Europe
  • NATO no longer trusts us
  • Many of our long term allies and friends are withdrawing their support due to our policies
  • Our domestic political situation is a total mess. No one is running the country anymore
  • Israel is feeling more and more isolated
  • Russia is now on their way to claim a large portion of the North Pole with all of it´s mineral resources
  • Venezuela is a mess, and we are not doing anything about it
  • We have a potential nuclear conflict brewing in the Kashmir
  • Russia and China are “taking over” African countries one by one, promising grand loans and support
  • Russia, China, Iran et all are preparing to influence our 2020 elections
  • We are heading for a global recession

All of above are pretty obvious to most of us, so why are we not doing anything about it?  We are so busy mud-slinging in the swamp, that we are about to lose our standing as the greatest democracy on Earth.  If we don´t support democracy around the World, democracy will die. That doesn´t mean that we have to play World Police either.

Last week I met a few good friends attending the AUSA in DC. Without exception, they had made the same observations.

My dear friend, I am really concerned for our country. Please tell me that what I am seeing is incorrect. If not, how can we help to prevent our great nation from becoming an isolated 2nd rate World Power??? What only takes a few months to lose will probably take decades to rebuild.

We have to be mature enough to disregard all partisan nonsense and look at what it best for our country!

(Republicans) are “losing” 3-4 states to the radical left, especially California and our weekend simulation now suggests that Mr. Trump will lose in 2020 – unless something is done.

Continue Reading

National Security

UPDATE: “Whistleblower” or (Lousy) Spy Within?

Published

on

UPDATE:  Sources – unconfirmed – indicate the “whistleblower”  held a clearance normally granted to support personnel who may come in contact with information of a higher classification level.

The Yankee White clearance, according to Wikipedia,

is an administrative nickname for a background check given in the United States of America for Department of Defense personnel and contractor employees working with the President and Vice President.[1] Obtaining such clearance requires, in part, a Single Scope Background Investigation (SSBI) which is conducted under the manuals of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Individuals having Yankee White clearances undergo extensive background investigation. The Yankee White clearance includes requirements of U.S. citizenship and unquestionable loyalty to the United States.

This suggests said “whistleblower” is not a career intelligence professional.

Also, not only was the complaint written by a group of people, as first reported here last week, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) and others knew about the complaint at least two weeks BEFORE it was filed.  This means there was collusion between the “whistleblower” and Congressionl Democrats and those Democrats withheld the information from their Republican counterparts.

What transpired in that time?

Was the “whistleblower” coached by Intelligence Committee members or staffers?

Was the complaint edited by Democrats?

Was CIA or Director of National Intelligence leadership, Inspectors General (IGs) General Counsels (GCs) or staffs aware of or complicit in a Democrat-only Congressional heads up?  If so, why was there no equal notification to cleared Republicans on the Committee?  If intelligence Community leadership did NOT know, why not?


Sources have confirmed that the individual who filed a “whistleblower” compliant against President Trump is currently under federal protection in a government safe house on the outskirts of Washington,  DC.

Although the identity of the individual is known, releasing his/her identity would likely be a federal offense and could possibly put him/her in physical danger.

Nonetheless, the same sources note that the individual is very politically active, and (s)he appears to represent a similar conspiracy to that revealed within the FBI and the “Russian collusion” hoax.

Having experiences with intelligence agency IGs, I recognize the critical value of the IG process in calling out organizational misfeasance.  IGs and their legal counterparts, the GC, walk a very sensitive path in mitigating personnel complaints.  Normally, the role of the GC is to protect the organization from legal danger and, again from experience, they do so with hairtrigger sensitivity.

But, not only is the “whistleblower” complaint process vital to organizational integrity, it is also a perfect bureaucratic maneuver to embarrass, shame or falsely accuse.  A finely crafted complaint with almost minimal validity might worm through the system.   If the complainant is coached, however, as appears to be the case here – and especially given the high profile accused – his/her accusation would certainly be fast-tracked.

The accusations that prompted the “whistleblower” clearly do not merit the Congressoonal and legal scrutiny it has gotten.  At best, the individual should have asked his agency’s GC if, (1) what (s)he was told about the Presidents call was accurate and (2) if, true, was what he said legally questionable?

Given what has been reported and information I have from other source(s) the “whistleblower” is a politically active, partisan Democrat employee of the Central Intelligence Agency.   It is unacceptable – despicable – for an intelligence officer to use privileged information to promote personal political beliefs.

Interestingly, were this intelligence officer reporting on a foreign leader’s conversation, his/her summation would be diamissed as eexaggerated hearsay.

Continue Reading

Foreign Policy

“Whistleblower” Complaint Written By Committee

It would be very unusual to see a complaint from an individual having been written by “a committee” before it is initially filed.  This was a very organized and deliberate effort.

Published

on

Document analysis (grammatic profiling) software has determined that the complaint submitted to Congress regarding a telephone conversation between President Trump and Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky was written by more than one person. (more…)

Continue Reading

Foreign Policy

Analysis: Iran War May Go Nuclear

Published

on

An overnight analysis of thousands of foreign language documents indicate the most likely developments in the Iranian crisis.

Iranian controlled groups in Yemen, Iraq and in Syria will launch additional missiles against Israel and Saudi Arabia.

The U.S. will respond with a massive (>100) Tomahawk cruise missile stand-off attack from naval ships and submarines in the Mediterranean.

The Iranians will attempt to jam the GPS guidance in the cruise missiles and in the aircrafts, using Russian supplied jammers.

Iran will launch a large number of missiles against U.S. bases and ships in the Middle East, as well as against targets in Saudi Arabia, Israel and other Gulf states. They will temporarily cause a halt in Saudi oil production, leading to petroleum shortages and rapidly rising prices and stunting the global economy.  All shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz will stop.

Israel will respond with low flying aircraft attacks against Iranian nuclear sites and military bases.

The U.S. will respond with massive ordnance air blast bombs (MOABs) against Iranian underground mountain nuclear labs and missile storage facilities. The U.S. and Israel will lose a number of aircraft to Russian designed AAA batteries / missiles.

This all depends upon the leadership in Tehran. The old religious leadership will not hesitate to use nuclear warheads against Israel and Saudi Arabia, but younger leaders are less anxious to escalate.  Should Iran decide to use ICBMs with nuclear warheads (developed in cooperation with North Korea), regional casualties on the order of 10-20 million people and significant global consequences can be expected.

Analysis also indicates a high probability that Kim Jung Un will soon transfer additional nuclear warheads to Tehran, using Russian and Iranian commercial airlines, with the full knowledge of Vladimir Putin.  It is, then, critical that the United States and her allies initiate enhanced tracking of large Iranian and Russian aircraft in the region with tactical plans tk intercept and divert suspicious flights.

The potential for increased Iran-centric conflict is certain and with it, a greater likelihood of war.  Unfortunately, the Rouhani regime is all too willing to escalate it’s twisted ideology to a nuclear level, even if it means an even more certain suicide.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider


Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend