Connect with us


REVEALED: Rep. Adam Schiff’s Staffers Worked with Ukraine ‘Whistleblower’ at White House

Even more evidence has emerged to prove that the so-called Ukraine “whistleblower” is a Democrat operative and not a true concerned citizen.



Even more evidence has emerged to prove that the so-called Ukraine “whistleblower” is a Democrat operative and not a true concerned citizen. This time we have learned that Democrat Intel Committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s staffers worked with this fake whistleblower in the White House during the Obama administration.

The news comes from the Washington Examiner which reported that Schiff recruited for his committee staff two former National Security Council aides who worked alongside the CIA whistleblower at the NSC during the Obama and Trump administrations.

Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC until 2018, was hired in February, while Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff’s committee staff in August, the same month the whistleblower submitted his complaint.

The whistleblower was an NSC official who worked with former Vice President Joe Biden and who has expertise in Ukraine, the Washington Examiner has reported.

Trending: MARK LEVIN: The Next Democrat President Must be Impeached

A career CIA analyst with Ukraine expertise, the whistleblower aired his concerns about a phone conversation between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to a House Intelligence Committee aide on Schiff’s staff. He had previously informed the CIA’s legal counsel’s office.

This web of connections is all more proof that this fake “whistleblower” is a CIA plant working hand-in-and with the Democrats to destroy Trump.

This faux whistleblower is NOT a true concerned citizen simply trying to highlight corruption but is, instead, a political operative.

This newest revelation is only one of several examples proving that this whistleblower is fake.

On Wednesday news broke that the so-called Ukraine whistleblower’s motives are suspect because he has ties to a major 2020 Democrat candidate for president. Now it appears that candidate is Joe Biden.

Lawyers for the “whistleblower” initially said that the CIA analyst worked in “the executive branch.” He was also reportedly “detailed to the National Security Council at one point.”

Intelligence Community’s inspector general Michael Atkinson later revealed that the so-called whistleblower had some sort of “professional ties” to a Democrat running for president.

Now, according to information that was obtained by the Washington Examiner, it appears that the Democrat candidate for president that this CIA operative parading as a “whistleblower” has ties to is Joe Biden.

A retired CIA officer told the Washington Examiner, “From everything we know about the whistleblower and his work in the executive branch then, there is absolutely no doubt he would have been working with Biden when he was vice president.”

As an experienced CIA official on the NSC with the deep knowledge of Ukraine that he demonstrated in his complaint, it is probable that the whistleblower briefed Biden and likely that he accompanied him on Air Force Two during at least one of the six visits the 2020 candidate made to the country.

We already had the August 26 letter that Intelligence Community’s inspector general Michael Atkinson wrote about his concerns that the fake whistleblower showed “some indicia of an arguable political bias … in favor of a rival political candidate.” We later found that the “whistleblower” was a registered Democrat.

Then came Atkinson’s report that the whistleblower had ties to a Democrat.

According to the Washington Examiner:

“The IG said [the whistleblower] worked or had some type of professional relationship with one of the Democratic candidates,” said one person with knowledge of what was said.

“The IG said the whistleblower had a professional relationship with one of the 2020 candidates,” said another person with knowledge of what was said.

“What [Atkinson] said was that the whistleblower self-disclosed that he was a registered Democrat and that he had a prior working relationship with a current 2020 Democratic presidential candidate,” said a third person with knowledge of what was said.

Atkinson did not divulge to which presidential candidate the faux “whistleblower” was connected.

Then we discovered that this so-called “whistleblower” who went to the government with inaccurate accusations of President Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president “accidentally” forgot to tell investigators that he had already been in contact with members of the Democrat Party.

Later we found out this “whistleblower” he did not tell the government that he was being coached by Rep. Adam Schiff, the California Democrat who currently chairs the House Intelligence Committee.

Per reporter Catherine Herridge:

This is most significant because according to Sean Davis, the form this faux whistleblower had to fill out for his complaint required him to disclose contacts such as that with the top Democrat on the House Intel Committee.

CNN’s Jake Tapper reported that a source came through with the information that the whistleblower is a registered Democrat.

“First from CNN, a source familiar with the whistleblower investigation tells me that the political bias referred to by the Intelligence Community Inspector General is that the whistleblower is a registered Democrat,” Tapper said on his Thursday The Lead broadcast. “That is the bias. The IG acknowledged the bias in his statement that said didn’t change the facts of the whistleblower complaint. The attorney for the whistleblower declined to give us a comment.”

There is more.

Only a day before, Democrat Rep. Adam Schiff admitted that the politically motivated “whistleblower” worked with his office to attack President Donald Trump long before he ever filed his intel complaint.

Contrary to Schiff’s claims that he never spoke to the “whistleblower” before he made his complaint about the president’s call with the Ukrainian president, the California congressman and ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee admitted he worked with the man after a New York Times article outed the information on Wednesday.

According to the New York Times, Schiff’s office was contacted at least a few days before the “whistleblower” filed his complaint against Trump.

“The early account by the future whistle-blower shows how determined he was to make known his allegations that Mr. Trump asked Ukraine’s government to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election. It also explains how Mr. Schiff knew to press for the complaint when the Trump administration initially blocked lawmakers from seeing it,” the paper wrote.

Then there is the fact that the “whistleblower’s” lawyers are major Democrat activists.

According to Breitbart News:

Whistleblower Aid, a small nonprofit helping the lawyers for the so-called whistleblower at the center of the impeachment movement targeting President Donald Trump, is heavily tied to far-left activist organizations and Democratic politics.

One of the co-founders of Whistleblower Aid previously worked at several liberal activist organizations financed by billionaire activist and Democratic Party megadonor George Soros. The other co-founder currently leads a separate organization that boasts on its four-person advisory board John Podesta, who led Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, served as Chief of Staff to Bill Clinton and founded the Soros-funded Center for American Progress pushing a progressive agenda.

Clearly this whole mess is a partisan political effort and no act of a “whistleblower” worried about presidential misconduct

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.



Joe Biden Preemptively Defies Senate Impeachment Trial Subpoena

Given just how rigged the Democratic portion of the process has been, Biden is playing with fire as Republicans gear up for the Senate trial.



During this latest round of impeachment hearings, House Republicans did all that they could to shed light on the actual impetus of the entire scheme, only to be shut down time and again by the Democratically-controlled committee chairs.

The entire process so far has been lopsided, according to the GOP, and is has disallowed quite a bit of evidence that could have been used to justify President Trump’s concerns over corruption in Ukraine.  The left has been attempting to convince the nation that Trump only wanted to damage 2020 candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden when he asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to do the United States a favor.  What this asinine assertion ignores is that Biden and his son Hunter’s work in Ukraine was merely a bit piece in a much larger corruption puzzle – something that would make Trump’s requests completely palatable if not downright exonerating.

The House Democrats specifically constructed the rules of these impeachment hearings to avoid broaching that subject…something that they won’t be able to do in the Republican-controlled Senate, where an impeachment trial could begin in only a matter of days.

As for Joe Biden, he is already writing off any attempt by the Republicans to get to the bottom of the situation.

The former vice president, who had already ruled out voluntarily testifying at the impeachment proceedings, told NPR in an interview published on Monday he would not cooperate with a subpoena.

“No, I’m not going to let you take the eye off the ball here. Everybody knows what this is about,” Biden said. “This is a Trump gambit he plays. Whenever he’s in trouble he tries to find someone else to divert attention to.”

When pressed, Biden stood resolute, claiming there was not “one scintilla of evidence” he did anything wrong.

“No, I will not yield to what everybody is looking for here,” the former vice president said. “And that is to take the eye off the ball.”

Given just how blatant the Democrats were in attempting to rig the outcome of the impeachment “inquiry” so far, it is unlikely that the Republicans will show any mercy with their subpoena and contempt powers moving forward.

This could certainly spell trouble for the former Vice President, should he choose to defy the machinations of the Senate.

Continue Reading


President Trump Tears into Democrats After They Introduce Two Articles of Impeachment

Democratic leaders have indicated that a full House vote on these two articles will likely occur later this week.



Today was yet another historic day in America, but for reasons that will likely live on in infamy and shame and not in some sort of patriotic reverence.

House Democrats spoke to the nation early this morning, laying out what many believed would be coming:  The articles of impeachment against Donald J. Trump.  On the dais were a number of notable anti-Trump voices including Congresswoman Maxine Waters, House Speakers Nancy Pelosi, and House Judiciary and Intel Chairmen Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff.

The left did their very best to remain somber and stoic, despite the unfettered and inexcusable glee of their constituents.

“Today, in the service to our duty to the Constitution and to our country, the House Judiciary Committee is introducing two articles of impeachment, charging the President of the United States of committing high crimes and misdemeanors,” Rep Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said, flanked by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) and other House committee chairs.

The charges — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — stem from second-hand allegations brought forth in a whistleblower complaint by a partisan CIA officer, who alleged President Trump attempted to pressure the leader of Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, in exchange for U.S. military aid. Both President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have both vehemently denied any pressure was applied during their July 25 telephone conversation at the center of the impeachment inquiry. The White House released a transcript of the president’s call with Zelensky as evidence that no wrongdoing occurred.

President Trump wasted no time in responding to the developments via Twitter.

Democratic leaders have indicated that a full House vote on these two articles will likely occur later this week.



Continue Reading


Doug Collins Completely Eviscerates Futile Impeachment Fiasco During Monday Hearing

Collins has been a leading voice for the Republican Party in these matters, and his taking a stand against the Democrats’ corrupt intent will likely cement his legacy among the conservative base.



Despite the pomp and the circumstance of this impeachment inquiry unfolding before us, there is no point to it all.  Nada.  Zilch.  Not one iota of gravity.

This is because, as many have pointed out in recent weeks, the entire fiasco is doomed to fail in the Republican-controlled Senate.  There will be no removal of President Trump, and there will be no consequence to the White House itself.  The only true impact that this process will have is on the American people, who are waiting desperately for their elected representatives to get back to work on healthcare costs, trade negotiations, and immigration…among other things.

Simply put, this is an exercise in futility designed to provide anti-Trump talking points to the mainstream media in the run-up to the 2020 election.

House Rep. Doug Collins, ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, excoriated the Democrats over this waste of taxpayer time and money during today’s hearing.

This is about a “clock and a calendar,” Collins said – something that became evident last week when Pelosi “walked up to the podium and said, ‘Go write articles of impeachment.’”

“She quit. She just stopped. Go write articles of impeachment,” Collins stated, adding that she “undercut” Democrats.

“She took the thrill out of the room. You’re writing articles of impeachment. Why couldn’t we just save that time today, and if you’re going to write articles of impeachment, go ahead and write them?” he continued, quoting Pelosi, who said that you have to be “so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan” in an impeachment effort.

“All of which, we are not,” he said before blasting [House Intel Chair Adam] Schiff, who refused to show up to Monday’s hearing.

Collins has been a leading voice for the Republican Party in these matters, and his taking a stand against the Democrats’ corrupt intent will likely cement his legacy among the conservative base.



Continue Reading


Pro-Trump Protestor Interrupts Impeachment Hearing: ‘America is Done With This!’

The ruckus encapsulated what many in the nation have felt for quite some time.



Tempers are flaring across the nation thanks to the incessant push toward impeachment being undertaken by the Democratic Party.

For many Americans, the entire process is little more than a sham, and a continuation of the “resistance” rhetoric that has so thoroughly permeated our nation’s political process.  Many see this UkraineGate scandal as merely the latest in a long line of fiascos meant to damage President Trump, reverse the 2016 election, and provide the mainstream media with ammunition against the Commander in Chief as we prepare to get the 2020 election cycle underway in earnest.

One man in the audience during today’s impeachment hearing could not hold his disdain any longer, and interrupted the proceedings with an outburst that fairly well encapsulated the beliefs of many Americans.

A brief disturbance erupted as House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler gaveled a briefing to order in the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.

A bearded man stood up from the back of the committee hearing room and began shouting against the inquiry.

“Jerry Nadler and his Democratic colleagues are committing treason against this country,” the man shouted, holding up his phone as if to record the incident. “America is done with this.”

Nadler, D-N.Y., kept pounding his gavel as the man shouted for about 34 seconds, as he was escorted out by Capitol police.

“We voted for Donald Trump,” the man shouted. “We are sick of the Democrat impeachment.”

Video footage of the incident was quickly shared on Twitter:

Today’s hearing could very well be one of the last held in the House of Representatives, with Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler intimating that the chamber could vote on articles of impeachment as early as this week.

There is no evidence that the Senate will allow this impeachment to continue into a removal of the President, which again reiterates the foolishness and futility of this entire endeavor.

Continue Reading


House Judiciary Committee Begins Using ‘Treason’ Verbiage in Latest Semantic Switcheroo

It will be hard to move the goalposts past ‘treason’, effectively placing the Democrats in their own linguistic box.



One of the most salient arguments being made by House Republicans in regard to the impeachment of Donald Trump is that the Democrats are consistently moving the goalposts.

We have heard this complaint from the very beginning, and with good reason; every other week there is a new revelation regarding the President’s behavior or his presumed motivation.  More specifically, and more pertinent as of late, are the constant adjustments being made to the legalese surrounding the case.  What began is a case of employing a “quid pro quo” was soon a case of “bribery”.  Then, not long afterward, it was “extortion”…and then “bribery” again.

The latest accusations have come under heavier auspices – specifically in the case of “abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress”.

But the big-daddy of all of these accusations has now arrived on Capitol Hill, and it should alarm any and all Americans within earshot.

Citing the constitutional provision that impeachment applies to “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the report hints throughout that President Trump might have committed treason against the United States.

The Constitution specifically defines treason in Article III, Section 3: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”

The House Judiciary Committee report, however, expands that definition to include what it calls “betrayal,” and declares: “Although the Framers did not intend impeachment for good faith disagreements on matters of diplomacy, they were explicit that betrayal of the Nation through schemes with foreign powers justified that remedy.”

The phrase “schemes with foreign powers” is sufficiently vague to include the “quid pro quo” plan that Democrats allege the president attempted to make with Ukraine, trading U.S. aid for investigation into a political opponent.

This constant routine of semantic gymnastics has made it difficult for Americans to take seriously this Democratic push to impeach Donald Trump, as it has muddied the waters regarding what it is that the left believes was done wrong.

The recent stagnation in polling regarding the favorability of impeachment tends to galvanize this most salient point:  That We The People are not falling for it.

Continue Reading


Biden Refuses To Admit It Was Wrong For Hunter To Serve On Burisma Board

He’s playing the “deflect” game.



Biden Refuses To Admit It Was Wrong For Hunter To Serve On Burisma Board

Joe Biden refuses to say it was wrong for Hunter to serve on Burisma’s board while he was Vice President.

In an interview with Telemundo anchor Jose Diaz-Balart, pressed on the matter Joe Biden did not budge. In fact, he tried to spin his way out when Diaz-Balart questioned Hunter’s business ethics by responding that his son’s actions were not unlawful. Biden then attempted to shift the focus back to Trump.

Here’s the video:

Translation: I never thought this would ever be revealed. IOW: You can’t give me money directly, because that would be considered bribery. But on the other hand, my unemployable wastrel son could use a lucrative no show job.

Twitter jumps on:
Continue Reading


Democrat Rep Charged With Stealing $500K From Non-Profit For Mentally Ill



Democrat Rep Charged With Stealing $500K From Non-Profit For Mentally Ill

Pennsylvania Democrat State Rep. Movita Johnson-Harrell has been charged with stealing more than $500,000 from a mental illness charity.

Democratic Rep. Movita Johnson-Harrell, who founded Motivations Education & Consultation Associates, allegedly diverted Medicaid and Social Security disability funds from the nonprofit and spent them on designer clothing, vacations, luxury car payments, real estate purchases, and other personal expenses, according to a press release by AG Josh Shapiro.

“Representative Johnson-Harrell continuously diverted Medicaid and social security disability funds from her charity to help Philadelphia’s most vulnerable communities for her own personal use. She spent almost $15,000 on clothing, including online shopping sprees at Ralph Lauren and fox fur coats. She traveled to Mexico, Orlando, Georgia and Maryland on lavish trips costing $16,000 of MECA funds. She spent $2,000 on overdue car payments on her Porsche. Another $4,000 on tuition for a relative. And, she spent almost $20,000 on overdue mortgage payments.”


Democrat Pennsylvania State Rep. Movita Johnson-Harrell, the first Islamic woman elected to the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, was charged by prosecutors this week for allegedly stealing over $500,000 from a non-profit for the mentally ill, perjury, and tampering with public records.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, announced the charges on Wednesday which came at the conclusion of an investigation into her operation of a non-profit, Motivations Education & Consultation Associates (MECA).

In a statement, Shapiro said that Johnson-Harrell turned herself in on Wednesday to law enforcement officials, and “is taking responsibility for her crimes, plans to plead guilty, and has agreed to resign from the Pennsylvania House of Representatives effective December 13th.”

The statement from Shapiro’s office noted just a few of the items that Johnson-Harrell allegedly spent the stolen funds on:

  • $5,500 on multiple fox fur coats,
  • $16,000 on vacations to Mexico (twice), Atlanta, and Ocean City, MD,
  • $2,065.95 to cover past-due Porsche payments,
  • $6,976 for designer clothing,
  • $3,000 for an overdue IRS tax bill,
  • $3,830 in tuition for relatives,
  • $3,200 to Philadelphia Gas Works,
  • $4,741.20 for City of Philadelphia taxes, and
  • $7,979.54 to cover a restitution payment for a 2014 criminal conviction where Johnson-Harrell failed to pay unemployment compensation tax.

I know both parties have their own dirtbags but this lady takes the championship. Living high off the hog with other people’s money. True Democratic values, taxes everyone and take the money for themself.

Who could possibly think she was fit to be a state representative? Way to do your due diligence Pennsylvania.


Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend