Connect with us

Politics

Peter Schweizer Guts Liberal Claims About the Bidens Troubling Conduct in Ukraine

Peter Schweizer decimated the false claims liberals have been tossing around about the Bidens troubling behavior in Ukraine.

Published

on

Investigative reporter Peter Schweizer recently decimated the false claims liberals have been tossing around about the Bidens troubling behavior in Ukraine.

The media is doing its level best to ignore the obvious truth that Hunter Biden’s extremely rich deal with a Ukrainian energy company was a major conflict of interest for his then vice president father, and deciding to focus instead on the false claim that Trump demanded a quid pro quo with Ukraine’s leadership when he became president.

In his take down of the left’s claims over this Ukraine business, Schweizer undermines the left’s wild claims and introduces a bit of truth to the story.

Firstly, it is awfully suspicious that Hunter Biden stumbled into a deal with Ukrainian energy company, Burisma, where he raked in $50,000 every month despite having no previous experience in anything that Burisma did. The fact that his father was vice president at the time the deal was struck stinks to high heaven.

Trending: President Trump Flips Another Liberal Court to a Conservative Majority

But Joe had an answer for this. Schweizer notes that Joe Biden claims that when he was vice president, he had an “absolute wall” between himself and his son, Hunter’s, business interests.

Biden claims that he knew absolutely nothing about his son’s business dealings. But that story is suspect considering that Hunter himself said that he and his father discussed the Ukraine deals he was making.

Not only that, but the office of the vice president was asked about Hunter’s high-dollar deal while Joe was still serving under Barack Obama. So, there is no way he can claim there was never any discussion about the suspicious deal.

If these great United States had anything close to a legitimate news media, they would all be more interested in why Joe Biden’s son was making millions in a foreign nation while Joe Biden was helping to implement U.S. foreign policy during the Trump administration.

Instead, we have a news media that is drumming up fake accusations that it is Trump demanding quid pro quos, instead of Biden.

Indeed, Biden himself admitted that he used U.S. foreign policy as a weapon to put an end to Ukraine’s budding investigation into Hunter Biden’s crooked business deals.

On the other hand, all Trump did was ask Ukraine to re-open the investigation. This is a wholly legitimate action by a U.S. president.

Despite what the Democrats are saying, Donald Trump did not ask Ukraine to “dig up dirt on his political opponent.” That claim is a 100 percent lie. But the media has been pushing it for a week, now. Regardless, what the Bidens did during the Obama administration was many times more troubling that Donald Trump’s recent phone call with Ukraine’s president.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement

Politics

Schiff Workin’ for The Weekend with Saturday Testimony from Budget Office

The Democrats are persistent, we’ll give ’em that.

Published

on

The Democrats and their “resistance” are running hot this week, after fireworks erupted in the House Intelligence Committee chambers during public impeachment hearings against Donald Trump.

At the center of this mess has been Democratic Representative Adam Schiff, chairman of the aforementioned intel committee.  His selective enforcement of the Democrats’ own rules on impeachment has irked the Republican Party to no end, after already finding themselves befuddled by Schiff’s secret and clandestine hearings weeks ago.

Now, Schiff’s got ’em working on the weekend.

House impeachment investigators met in private Saturday with a White House budget official as the historic inquiry produces new testimony offering direct insight of President Donald Trump’s actions toward Ukraine.

After a week of dramatic public hearings, investigators heard late Friday in closed session from State Department official David Holmes, who delivered a firsthand account that puts the president at the forefront of events.

What exactly did Holmes allege to have heard?

Holmes, the political counselor at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, testified that he overheard Trump in a phone call with his European Union ambassador, Gordon Sondland, saying he wanted Ukraine to conduct investigations. Sondland later explained the investigations pertained to “Bidens” — a reference to former Vice President Joe Biden and Biden’s son Hunter, who served on the board of a gas company in Ukraine. No wrongdoing by either Biden has been substantiated.

And about that Budget Office testimony?

The latest witness was Mark Sandy, a White House budget officer, as Democrats scrutinize the administration’s decision to withhold military aid from Ukraine while Trump pushed the country’s new president for the political investigations.

Sandy was the first official from the Office of Management and Budget to defy Trump’s instructions not to testify. Like others, he received a subpoena to appear.

Republicans have been making the case that, since the aide money was not ultimately withheld, and since the Ukraine didn’t even know about the holdup, there was no possible way that the President’s negotiations on a July 25th phone call could amount to an incriminating act.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nancy Pelosi Says Trump is ‘Imposter’ After POTUS Torches Yovanovitch

Pelosi is losing her grip on civility.

Published

on

Nancy Pelosi was doing fairly well at biting her tongue during this otherwise divisive impeachment process, attempting, at 79 years of age, to be the adult in the room.

Madam Speaker is losing her patience, however, and has begun to lash out, directing her ire at Republicans, the press, and even the President.

Her latest tirade against Trump saw the longtime Democrat insult the Commander in Chief as an “imposter”.

From a recent CBS interview:

Pelosi answered, “What the president, and perhaps some at the White House have to know, that the words of the president weigh a ton. They are very significant, and he should not frivolously throw out insults, but that’s what he does. I think part of it is his own insecurity as an impostor. I think he knows full well that he’s in that office way over his head. And so, he has to diminish everyone else.”

Just days ago, Pelosi had a similar lapse in civility during a Q&A with the press, in which she belittled one of the gathered reporters as “Mr. Republican Talking Points”.

Pelosi herself was reluctant to engage in this “formal impeachment inquiry” for months, only finally join her fellow Democrats in calling for such a maneuver after an anonymous whistleblower with second and third-hand knowledge of possible improprieties attributed to the President.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Rudy Giuliani Jokes About ‘Insurance’ Against Trump Throwing Him Under the Bus

The Democrats seem to think that Trump will be cutting Rudy loose, and the former NYC Mayor’s joke is raising some eyebrows as a result.

Published

on

The net being cast by the Democrats during this impeachment inquiry is growing ever wider, as their hopes of taking the nation hostage until the 2020 election continues to evolve.

Taking a cue from the RussiaGate conspiracy investigation and Robert Mueller himself, the left is drawing ever larger circles around their potential targets, possibly in a bid to intimidate Donald Trump – an ill-advised strategy given how unflappable the Commander in Chief has been over the course of the last three years.

The latest Trump confidante in the crosshairs is now Rudy Giuliani, who the Democrats are accusing of running some sort of “shadow diplomacy” on the subject of Ukraine.  When asked if he was worried about the President letting him take the fall for this fiasco, the former Mayor of New York City had an alarming joke.

In an interview with The Guardian, the former New York mayor was asked whether he was nervous the president might decide to throw him under the bus.

The House is investigating claims Trump abused his office in waging a pressure campaign, in which Giuliani played a key role, for Ukraine to announce investigations meant to benefit Trump politically.

“I’m not, but I do have very, very good insurance, so if he does, all my hospital bills will be paid,” Giuliani remarked in the article, published Thursday.

At this point in the call Giuliani’s own attorney, Robert Costello, interjected to say: “He’s joking.”

The humor did raise some eyebrows, however, particularly when coupled with some recent mainstream reporting.

Axios reported that they were mulling portraying him as a rogue actor who sought to broker a deal with Ukraine without the president’s full knowledge.

Giuliani in the interview insisted that Trump was a “very loyal guy” who would not abandon an ally.

Given that President Trump has staunchly defended Roger Stone just moments after his recent legal loss, it is doubtful that someone as close to the President as Giuliani would find himself on the outs anytime soon.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Tweet Regarding Yovanovitch Triggers Eric Swalwell Live During Impeachment Hearing

Swalwell would go so far as to say that the tweet could be an article of impeachment itself.

Published

on

The ongoing public impeachment hearings were worrisome to many Americans, who believed that such a spectacle would turn our nation’s capital into a circus, and make a mockery of the sacred spaces in which they occur.

They were right.

Our nation’s public servants sit before us today, railing against President Trump in unbelievable new ways, hoping to conjure some sort of offense out of thin air that will allow them to reverse the results of the 2016 election, some three years after Americans let their voices be heard.

During this latest round of testimony from former Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, a tweet by President Trump was suddenly the topic of discussion – triggering House Democrat Eric Swalwell in the process.

During a Friday interview with CNN:

Host Anderson Cooper asked, “You think this should be added, potentially, to articles of impeachment?”

Swalwell said, “It should be considered. Because there’s strong evidence of intimidation.”

The tweet in question came during Yovanovitch’s congressional testimony.

The President also clarified that ambassadorship isn’t the sort of job that comes with an HR department.

Ms. Yovanovitch’s testimony is ongoing at this time, with a stark contrast in tone between party lines.

Continue Reading

Politics

Freshman Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez Calls for Resignation of White House Adviser Stephen Miller

AOC has completely ignored the fact that Miller’s ancestors were themselves persecuted on account of their ethnicity.

Published

on

Of all of the absurd and inflammatory claims being made about Donald Trump and his administration, none has been more offensive than the allegation that he and his inner circle are promoting racism and bigotry.

This is the liberal equivalent of going nuclear, as it invokes hundreds upon hundreds of years worth of hatred and violence here in the United States, and it quite difficult to defend against as racism itself is only a trait that is apparent during the brazen acts that all who witness them can instantly recognize.  As such, the possibility of someone possessing such vile traits without being outed en masse is quite slim.

Yet, still, small pockets of the Democratic Party continue to employ the tactic to defame those with whom they disagree politically.

“Stephen Miller, Trump’s architect of mass human rights abuses at the border (including child separation & detention camps w/ child fatalities) has been exposed as a bonafide white nationalist,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter on Tuesday. “He’s still at the White House shaping US immigration policy. Miller must resign. Now.”

On Wednesday, she retweeted a link to her online petition calling for Miller’s resignation.

“Each day we allow a white nationalist to be in charge of US immigration policy is a day where thousands of children & families lives are in danger,” the New York Democrat said. “This year alone, under Miller’s direction, the US has put almost 70,000 children in custody.” She did not cite her source for that figure.

Of course, Miller’s ancestors were themselves persecuted on the basis of their ethnicity – a point that was not lost on his defenders.

Fellow “Squad” member Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., previously criticized Miller’s influence on federal immigration policy when she called him a “white nationalist” on Twitter in April.

Critics of Omar pointed out that Miller is Jewish and condemned her remarks as anti-Semitic. The president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., also weighed in, calling Omar the “head of the Farrakhan Fan Club” and saying she “apparently has no shame.”

President Trump defended Miller by retweeting a quote attributed to media executive Jeff Ballabon, CEO of B2 Strategic.

“What’s completely unacceptable is for Congresswoman Omar to target Jews, in this case Stephen Miller,” Ballabon reportedly said.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is known for her hyper partisan rhetoric and unkempt rage when it comes to all-things-Trump, making this latest outburst seem rather ordinary, despite its alarming nature.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Pelosi Escalates Anti-Trump Rhetoric by Invoking ‘Bribery’ in Press Conference

Pelosi also refused to acknowledge that none of the witnesses brought forth so far have had direct knowledge of the supposed improprieties, and admonished a reporter for mentioning that fact.

Published

on

The constant shifting and refocusing of the Democrats’ case for impeachment has been more than a mere annoyance for Americans the nation over, and lends a great deal of gravity to the idea that we are now living in a world where our elected leaders will be forced to work under indefinite investigatory pressure for the entirety of their terms.

Now, while President Trump continues to remind lawmakers that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky felt “no pressure” during a supposedly damning phone call between the two nations back in July, the Democrats are purposefully evolving their verbiage on the subject to keep the interest of their political base.

The latest example of these semantic gymnastics come to us from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who today described the aforementioned phone call as “bribery”.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says the president’s actions in the impeachment inquiry amount to “bribery.”

Pelosi told reporters Thursday that while President Donald Trump says his call with Ukraine was “perfect,” she thinks “it’s perfectly wrong.”

There was a very specific reason for this language as well:

Bribery is an impeachable offense spelled out in the Constitution.

Pelosi would go on to chastise one reporter for mentioning the Republican defense of the President that much of what is being exposed by this impeachment “inquiry” is second or third-hand knowledge or “hearsay”.

While it is true that the witnesses brought forth so far have had no direct knowledge of the information alleged in the now-infamous whistleblower complaint, Pelosi and other Democrats have attempted to portray this fact as irrelevant in hopes of continuing their ruse for an as-of-yet undetermined amount of time.

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Jordan Shreds Democrats’ Impeachment Witness: ‘What You Heard Did Not Happen’

Rep. Jim Jordan: And you’re their star witness.

Published

on

Jordan Shreds Democrats’ Impeachment Witness: ‘What You Heard Did Not Happen’

Jim Jordan shredded the Democrats’ impeachment witness Ambassador William Taylor: ‘What you heard did not happen.’

Today in a nutshell: Ambassador William Taylor wasn’t on the call. He’s never spoken with Mulvaney. He’s never met the president. And he’s their star witness. “I’ve seen church prayer chains that are easier to understand than this.” -Jim Jordan

TDW:

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) ripped Democrats’ impeachment witness Ambassador William Taylor on Wednesday as he deconstructed the narrative the Democratic Party has promoted surrounding President Donald Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

During one exchange, Jordan highlighted Taylor’s limited knowledge of the events about which he was testifying:

Jordan: You didn’t listen in on President Trump and Zelensky’s call?

Taylor: I did not.

Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?

Taylor: I never did.

Jordan: You’ve never met the president?

Taylor: That’s correct.

Jordan: You had three meetings again with Zelenksy and it didn’t come up … and President Zelensky never made an announcement. … and you’re their star witness.

“In those 55 days that aid is delayed, you met with President Zelensky three times,” Jordan said. “The first one was on July 26, the day after the famous call now between President Trump and President Zelensky.” More

Continue Reading

Become an insider


Latest Articles

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Pin It on Pinterest