Connect with us


Why Does The Myth of Man-Made Climate Change Persist?



Increasing evidence is stacking up against the claim of climate change, but the propaganda continues.
Albert Einstein once famously quipped: “If the facts don’t fit the theory, change the facts.” This was obviously a joke, but it pointed to a very serious and pervasive problem within the scientific community—one that continues to this day. The intention, I assume, behind his joke was to observe just how easily facts can be warped to serve an agenda. The job of a scientist, in its purest form, is to search for understanding by reaching into the void of what we do not know, not to selectively piece together evidence to suit a theory that one has already fully constructed. But science is often funded by the state, and given that, it is easily, and frighteningly corruptible.
Ashley Pratte of the Young America’s Foundation recently interviewed students on the UCSB campus, asking them their opinions on climate change and global warming (otherwise known as what climate change used to be called before the lack of evidence necessitated a name change—soon to be climate disruption). The responses were not atypical of what one might expect at a university, given universities are liberal indoctrination centers. For your edification, and general amusement, I present to you several of the most egregious answers:

  • Rising sea levels–global warming is responsible for that.”
  • “It’s gonna get really hot.”
  • “I think we can tell every day that the temperatures are getting warmer.”
  • “All the evidence is there…”
  • “Take a look around, and if you compare before we made such drastic changes till now, it’s real.”
  • Wake up. Look at the facts…well, it’s a widely accepted theory. I mean, gravity’s a theory.”
  • “The data’s there…with the climate going up, and up.

In an article for Forbes, Peter Ferrara wrote of the Little Ice Age, which occurred from approximately the mid 1200’s to the beginning of the 1800’s. During this time, it was reported historically that the Thames river would freeze solid, New York harbor froze in 1780, and “Oxygen/isotope analysis from the Pacific Islands indicates a 1.5 degree Celsius temperature decline between 1270 and 1475 A.D.” This was a period of globally cooling temperatures, which followed several hundred years of warming. These temperature changes were related to the natural changes of the sun and the ocean. That is all well documented, and understood.
Now, with the global warming–sorry, climate change–sorry, climate disruption crusaders on the loose, we are constantly and continuously bombarded with this one simple idea: global warming/climate change is real, it is anthropogenic, and because the majority of scientists “agree” on this, it cannot, and must not be disputed. But what are the facts? I have no party allegiance in terms of facts. If climate change were in fact man-made, I would have no problem believing that fact, and I would gladly join the fight. The bible even tells us to take care of the earth we have been given by God. So it’s not as if I hate the trees. What I do hate is being manipulated in order to serve an agenda.
Climate alarmists allege that the earth is warming because of our carbon emissions. But is that true? The Economist puts it quite succinctly, saying “The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO2 put there by humanity since 1750.” Even with that massive output, the global temperature has not risen in the last 18 years. So, if the climate is being affected by carbon emissions, as is being alleged by climate change activists, doesn’t it seem odd that during the period in which the most carbon was released into the atmosphere, the temperature has not risen at all?
Peter Ferrara claims that it is not carbon emissions that lead to fluctuating temperatures, but rather the oscillations of the ocean:

The increase in global temperatures since the late 19th century just reflects the end of the Little Ice Age. The global temperature trends since then have followed not rising CO2 trends but the ocean temperature cycles of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). Every 20 to 30 years, the much colder water near the bottom of the oceans cycles up to the top, where it has a slight cooling effect on global temperatures until the sun warms that water. That warmed water then contributes to slightly warmer global temperatures, until the next churning cycle.”

In the April 27th, 2013 issue of The Sunday Telegraph, Christopher Booker wrote:
Last week it was reported that 3,318 places in the USA had recorded their lowest temperatures for this time of year since records began. Similar record cold was experienced by places in every province of Canada. So cold has the Russian winter been that Moscow had its deepest snowfall in 134 years of observations.”
This year alone, the United States has shattered numerous cold records. Everything that is occurring is defying all the projections made by climate scientists. Ferrara concludes his article with this:

But there is a fundamental problem with the temperature records from this contentious period, when climate science crashed into political science. The land based records, which have been under the control of global warming alarmists at the British Met Office and the Hadley Centre Climate Research Unit, and at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in the U.S., show much more warming during this period than the incorruptible satellite atmosphere temperature records. Those satellite records have been further confirmed by atmospheric weather balloons. But the land based records can be subject to tampering and falsification.

My point is that there is ample, and increasing evidence stacking up against the theory of anthropogenic global warming (climate change/disruption), yet the propaganda has reached an all time high. Why is this? Because, as Ferrara brilliantly concludes, there is an agenda behind the data. If the facts don’t fit the theory, change the facts.
This notion has grown from being a simple idea, a theory, into a beast that cannot be killed. There are numerous possible reasons behind this. First, and foremost, there is always money to be made through panic. The green initiative has helped many turn a profit. But I think there is a deeper agenda here, and it is to gin up fear in order to get votes. The monolithic left (not just the Democratic Party, but all who subscribe to modern liberal ideas) have whipped up this fictional, yet terribly frightening beast, and they have gone on to tell the commoners (us) that this beast will kill them if they don’t do something about it. The commoners, who have been convinced that this wicked beast is quite real, due to the media’s collusion with the monolithic left, have become terrified. They ask “What can we do?” The left tells them “Vote for us, and we will save you.” But they don’t stop there; they go one step further, telling the commoners “If you vote for the other guy, we will all die.” It’s a classic propagandist move, right out of the playbook, and one that works supremely well.
Power is hungry, and it cannot stop filling its gullet. The evidence is not on the side of the climate alarmists, yet they myth of anthropogenic climate change has pervaded, as you can see in the responses from the students at UCSB. They repeat what they’re told by their teachers, with little regard for the truth, and no effort to seek out alternate explanations, such as a proper scientist would do.
Climate science has been corrupted by politics. It’s as plain as the nose on my face. But dare to speak up, and you will be mocked, and castigated for your beliefs.
If you are a believer in anthropogenic climate change, all I ask is that you look at the evidence I have presented, read the rest of Peter Ferrera’s article, seek out the alternative viewpoint in a rational way, without judgment, and reach into the void with your own hands, and mind. Do not change your facts to fit your theories, change your theories to fit your facts.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Wind Turbine Blades Can’t Be Recycled, Now They’re Piling Up in Landfills

Nice going environuts, now your broken and used wind turbine blades are piling up by the thousands in landfills.



Nice going environuts, now your broken and used wind turbine blades are piling up by the thousands in landfills.

Do you environuts ever do anything right?

Apparently, the material in these millions of wind turbine blades cannot be recycled, according to Bloomberg.

These turbine blades are huge, too. Each one is as long as the wing on a 747. And that means they can’t be just carted away. They must be chopped up into at least three sections to fit on flatbed trucks to be carted away.

As Bloomberg noted:

Tens of thousands of aging blades are coming down from steel towers around the world and most have nowhere to go but landfills. In the U.S. alone, about 8,000 will be removed in each of the next four years. Europe, which has been dealing with the problem longer, has about 3,800 coming down annually through at least 2022, according to BloombergNEF. It’s going to get worse: Most were built more than a decade ago, when installations were less than a fifth of what they are now.

Bloomberg added that the blades can’t be repurposed, or crushed, or recycled. So, they are all just destined to end up in landfills.

They also never degrade!!

That means these things are stuck in the landfills “forever,” Bloomberg noted.

Even when they are burned in an attempt to use them for energy production, it is practically a useless effort:

In the European Union, which strictly regulates material that can go into landfills, some blades are burned in kilns that create cement or in power plants. But their energy content is weak and uneven and the burning fiberglass emits pollutants.

So, think about this. These wind turbines don’t really give much useful power when they are twirling in the wind. And then, when these turbines break down and need to be disposed of, they become an ecological mess!

Isn’t this so typical of how the left works? All full of wild promises that come to nothing? In fact, their wonderful “green” ideas always make matters worse!

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Maryland County Admits They Haven’t Recycled Garbage for Seven Years Despite Recycling rules

A Maryland county has finally admitted it has not recycled glass for seven years despite requiring residents to separate their garbage.



A Maryland county has finally admitted it has not recycled glass for seven years despite requiring residents to separate their garbage.

Baltimore County has been forcing residents to separate glass from their regular garbage for decades and telling them that the county is recycling the glass. But despite paying extra garbage trucks to pick up the glass, and despite telling residents to continue separating their garbage, the county hasn’t recycled any glass at all for almost a decade, already.

Instead of recycling the glass, the county has just been trashing it all with its regular garbage, reported.

“There are numerous issues with glass recycling, including increased presence of shredded paper in recycling streams which contaminates materials and is difficult to separate from broken glass fragments, in addition to other limitations on providing quality material,” county spokesperson Sean Naron told media.

But it gets worse. Apparently, the recycling ended in 2013, the very same year that the county opened a $23 million, tax-funded recycling center.

What a huge waste of cash!

The facility is called a “single-stream” recycling plant. It allows a machine to separate recyclables automatically instead of using humans to pick through the trash.

But it turns out that the county stopped the recycling because the glass is all too often contaminated with food and paper making the glass too impure to be worth recycling.

It’s all just another scam for government to boost costs, waste money on useless technology, and put cash in the pockets of their pals who sell that tech.

So, why did county officials continue to tell residents to continue separating their garbage and continuing this recycling ruse? Because they are so dedicated to the pretense that they love recycling, reality and truth doesn’t even matter.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Climate Change Activists Disrupt Black Friday Shopping

Climate change crazies across the world surged into shopping malls to disrupt shoppers as they hit the shopping centers on Black Friday.



Climate change crazies across the world surged into shopping malls to disrupt shoppers as they hit the shopping centers to find those Black Friday bargains.

In once case, whiny demonstrators hit Chicago’s Magnificent Mile and its famed Water Town Place to try and block shoppers from getting into stores. The attacks were planned by the nuts with the Illinois Youth Climate Strike.

“We will be disrupting business as usual to make sure shoppers cannot ignore the climate emergency,” said coordinator Lillie Schneyer, 23. “Watertower Place is an ideal setting for us to draw attention to the culpability of large corporations and fast fashion who have put profits for a greedy few ahead of the needs of many, contributing to catastrophic impacts on our climate and the rising inequality and poor working conditions that we see as twin crises in our country today.”

Then there were the malcontents of the Northwest Indiana Youth Council who planned to perpetrate a “Day of Defiance” outside a mall in Hobart, Indiana.

“Today is especially important because it’s a massive consumer holiday. Textile consumption is estimated to be the second biggest contributor to climate change. And the tech industry, through planned obsolescence, creates a lot of waste,” Indiana University freshman Ethyl Ruehman said.

Hey friends, I just wanted to address something major, as I have helped organize and will be taking part of NWI Youth'…

Posted by Ethyl Ruehman on Thursday, November 28, 2019

Foolhardy activists in Washington, D.C. also planned a closed-casket “Black Friday Funeral For Future” outside the U.S. Capitol building. Organizers planned to “eulogize and mourn all that has been lost and all that is threatened by the climate crisis,” followed by a funeral procession throughout the city.

The proto terrorists of Extinction Rebellion also jumped in with protests in New York City.

Few shoppers had any interest in these meaningless stunts, though, and this year’s Black Friday shopping was bigger than ever.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Climate Activist Greta Thunberg Sails Yacht Made of Petroleum Products to Climate Conference in Spain



Climate change hypocrite and teenage high priestess of global warming hysteria Greta Thunberg has been caught sailing a yacht made of non-sustainable petroleum products so she can make a climate change conference in Spain.

The 14-year-old scolder of the world who seems to think she was sent by God to save the earth was headed toward South America when she discovered that the conference she was headed toward was moved from Santiago, Chile, to Spain.

That left the arrogant girl stranded in the ocean too far away from the event in Spain to reach it in time via the sea.

But now, Thunberg has announced that another yachter has come to her rescue and offered her a ride to Spain.

Thunberg, who has refused to fly because — like all good communists — she opposes modernity, jumped to social media to make the happy announcement that she caught a ride.

“So happy to say I’ll hopefully make it to COP25 in Madrid,”she tweeted. “I’ve been offered a ride from Virginia on the 48ft catamaran La Vagabonde. Australians @Sailing_LaVaga ,Elayna Carausu & @_NikkiHenderson from England will take me across the Atlantic. We sail for Europe tomorrow morning!” Thunberg wrote last Tuesday.

So, what about this “48ft catamaran La Vagabonde”?

Well, it looks like the craft is just the type that ol’ Greta is supposed to be opposing.

As the Washington Times noted, “Twelve weeks after sailing into New York City, Greta hitched a ride back to Europe Wednesday with celebrity sailors Elayna Carausu and Riley Whitelum on La Vagabonde, a luxury catamaran made of petroleum products like fiberglass.”

The boat is an Outremer 45 that weighs 17,400 pounds and is made of fiberglass, or fiber-reinforced plastic. The yacht was pumped out of the ground by oil companies. It draws auxiliary power from twin Volvo Diesel engines.

Not very environmentally friendly, huh?


There were a few other points about this ride that seems to make Greta a hypocrite, too.

Greta’s father Svante Thunberg and British yachtswoman Nikki Henderson joined the La Vagabonde crew, raising questions about whether they flew across the pond only to sail back.

In addition to solar and hydro power, the craft is equipped with two diesel 30hp engines, according to Multihull Central, a boat-reviewing site, as noted by climate skeptic Tom Nelson.

This little chippie is nothing but a hypocrite.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Pot Prohibition Creates Environmental Nightmare as Cartel Cultivators Exploit US Nat’l Parks

With Canada and Mexico already taking steps to legalize marijuana, the abhorrent drug cartels are left with only one place to operate their violent and destructive black market.



America, the land of the free, has a long history of ill-advised prohibitions that create more harm than good, and that hasn’t changed in 2019.

Despite the fact that an ever-growing number of locales are legalizing the use of marijuana, the plant is still federally prohibited in the same way that heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine are.  This has given pot prohibition proponents the upper hand, politically, allowing an ever-more devastating black market to thrive here in the United States.

To make matters worse, both Canada and Mexico have now taken steps to legalize the plant, making the United States the sole nation in North America where Mexican drug cartels can operate their booming and clandestine business.

Not only do these violent and abhorrent pot peddlers pose a threat to American citizens and law enforcement agents, but they also create an incredible amount of damage to a wide swath of our nation’s most precious natural wonders.

Drug cartels are not only setting up huge marijuana farms on national forest lands in California, but they are also polluting the land and water with trash and toxic chemicals.

“The true crime here is the fact that they’re killing off basically America’s public lands, killing off the wildlife, killing off our water,” Kevin Mayer, a U.S. Forest Service law enforcement assistant special agent in charge, said. “This is stuff that, you know, it’s not gonna repair itself.”

A California public radio outlet reported that a coalition of environmentalists, law enforcement agents, politicians, and wildlife ecologists are trying to stop the drug operations and repair the damage:

Some in that coalition recently visited a site discovered deep in California’s Shasta-Trinity National Forest. They and a group of armed Forest Service agents made their way down a steep hillside above a creek on a warm fall day, through a tangle of Douglas fir and madrone trees and big leaf maples turned golden yellow. Finally, the forest gives way to a sprawling grow and camp site. It’s typical in shape: terraced plots carved erratically into a hillside scared [sic] by wildfire. The burned trees and new growth offer some cover from air surveillance. Two Mexican nationals were arrested at the site in September; they are suspected of being affiliates of a cartel.There’s some 3,000 pounds of trash here from discarded clothes and propane tanks to 3 miles of plastic irrigation pipes — an indication this site has likely been used for years. Most of it eventually will have to be hauled out by helicopter.

And it gets worse…

“This one is Bromethalin, which is a neurotoxin rodenticide,” wildlife ecologist Greta Wengert said, holding up an empty container used for rodent bait blocks.

“They also found a container of concentrated carbofuran, an insecticide banned by the Environmental Protection Agency. Carbofuran is produced in the U.S. by Pennsylvania-based FMC Corp, which exports the product to Mexico, India and other nations,” KVCR reported. “The European Union, Canada and Brazil have full bans on carbofuran.

“It is incredibly toxic,” Wengert said. “A quarter teaspoon could kill a 600-pound black bear. So obviously just a tiny amount can kill a human. It remains in an ecosystem for a long period of time.”

“We have detected [carbofuran] in the soil, in cannabis plants, in native vegetation, the water, the infrastructure,” Wengert said.

Those toxins then travel throughout the ecosystem, spread by the otherwise natural processes that occur in these protected areas.

Again, this is all thanks to the national government’s prohibition of the plant, and the direct contribution that this has to the black market here in the United States.  The only true way to combat these illegal grow operations is to make them unviable and unprofitable, and the easiest way to do that is through the national legalization of cannabis – as has been done in Canada and Mexico already.

Continue Reading


President Donald Trump Officially Pulling Out of Paris Accord Climate Change Agreement

President Donald Trump revealed this week that he is officially pulling the United States out of the Paris Accord climate change agreement.



Marking another campaign promise kept, President Donald Trump revealed this week that he is officially pulling the United States out of the Paris Accord climate change agreement.

On Monday, the president noted that after years of waiting, the United Nations has now been told that the U.S. will officially pull out of the accords. Trump said the process to exit the agreement will start immediately.

The announcement was revealed in a statement Monday from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

“President Trump made the decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement because of the unfair economic burden imposed on American workers, businesses, and taxpayers by U.S. pledges made under the Agreement,” Pompeo said. “The United States has reduced all types of emissions, even as we grow our economy and ensure our citizens’ access to affordable energy.”

Trump has always criticized the accord and made a promise to get the U.S. out of the deal if he became president.

He continued bashing the agreement after winning the White House.

For instance, in a speech in the White House Rose Garden in June of 2017, Trump slammed the accord as a “bad deal” for the U.S.A. because it allowed major polluters like China, India, and other countries to continue increasing emissions while hampering the U.S. with economy-killing rules.

“The fact that the Paris deal hamstrings the United States while empowering some of the world’s top-polluting countries should dispel any doubt as to why foreign lobbyists wish to keep our magnificent country tied up and bound by this agreement,” Trump said.

The decision comes ahead of the kick-off of the 2020 election campaign season and will undoubtedly serve as a selling point of being a promise the president has kept while in office.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


California SLAMMED by EPA Over Pollution Relating to Homelessness

This is just the latest spat between the President and The Golden State.



For weeks, the Trump administration has been at odds with the State of California regarding its own environmental regulations.

For starters, the Golden State had planned to implement new regulations regarding emissions for commuter cars  – something that the White House worked to strike down.

President Donald Trump’s plan to eliminate California’s right to set its own auto emissions standards could spur automakers to make larger vehicles that emit more tailpipe pollution, which contributes to climate change.

But the automakers may not dramatically shift their strategies.

Trump’s plan, which he disclosed Wednesday in a series of tweets, is likely to be delayed in a federal court battle with California. Under a federal waiver, California has historically set stricter emissions standards, but Trump is attempting to cancel the waiver.

He pledged that the move would create “much less expensive” vehicles and “new, extremely environmentally friendly cars.”

This sparked a nasty war of words between California lawmakers and President Trump, which has now come full circle as the President decries the state’s embarrassing homelessness epidemic and the pollution that comes along with it.

In yet another strike against California, the Trump administration accused the state of “failing to protect Californians from degraded water,” specifically citing concerns about waste from homeless populations getting into sewer systems.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler wrote to California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday alleging the state has not addressed water pollution tied to thehomelessness crisis in major cities like San Francisco, specifically when the sewer system can overflow during heavy rain and release untreated water into other areas like the San Francisco Bay.

The issue of homelessness, particularly in San Francisco, has spawned a number of creative, neighborhood-specific solutions to the problem.

Just this week, large boulders were placed on city sidewalks in order to prevent vagrants and the disenfranchised from camping out in front of homes and businesses.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Send this to a friend