Connect with us

Religion

‘Moderate’ Muslim Declares on Live TV: ‘Muslims Have the Right to Kill Anyone who Does not Respect Islam’ [VIDEO]

Published

on

I confess that I appreciate when Islamists are honest about what they believe and why they believe it, especially when it comes to the murderous nature of what they have been taught about jihad and following in the footsteps of their founder, Muhammad.  That’s why the following video interview with Mullah Krekar that aired on Norwegian television, is so eye-opening for those who want to continually bury their heads in the sand concerning Islam.  Not only does Krekar say it’s ok to kill non-Muslims, but adds, “Muslims have the right to Kill anyone who does not respect Islam.”

Take a look at the 2015 interview and read the transcripts of the relevant portion.

https://youtu.be/Vp_1JvRsCYE

Host: For someone who burns the Koran, the punishment, according to Islam, is death, is that correct?

Trending: Rep Turner Gets Witness To Admit Bombshell, Debunking CNN Headline

Mullah Krekar: If you burn the Koran, which is an insult, then the answer is clearly yes.

Host: But the man who has burned the Koran, would it be right that he loses his life even though he lives in Norway?

Mullah Krekar: I know absolutely that he has committed a criminal offense where the punishment is death. The responsibility for carrying out the punishment is on the Ummah, our Muslim brotherhood.

Regardless if he lives in Norway, or if he is Barack Obama, I am not myself threatening the person.

I am telling you what is stated in the law.

I have told you what is in the Koran and in the Hadith.

I have not pointed at one specific person and said, “You, we must kill.”

Host: One of those who burned a Koran is afraid because somebody who listens to you might want to kill him, because you have said that is the punishment according to the Koran. Isn’t there the risk that somebody would listen to you?

Mullah Krekar: He must fear… anybody who follows the Koran… will have to fear the crime he has committed and fear that his punishment will be executed…

Anybody who knows of this punishment can kill him. Anybody. We will defend out religion with our own blood. Our only limits are limits of blood, limits made of explosives.

Those who insult our religion must know that one of us will die. Those who insult our religion and our honor must understand – that this is a matter of life and death.

Host: Would you be satisfied if this man gets killed?

Mullah Krekar: Yes. I would send a gift to the person who kills him. Why wouldn’t I be happy about that?

Host: How would you describe those who attacked Charlie Hebdo?

Mullah Krekar: They were defending their honor, they were defending their holiness… Yes, of course, {they were heroes}. They were Jihadists.

If you still believe Islam is a “religion of peace,” perhaps you are just being willingly ignorant and blind about the matter.  Thankfully, at least the State Department took the steps to designate open Islamic jihadi cleric Anjum Choudary as a global terrorist.  Now, let’s see if President Donald Trump will make good on the promise to advance the bill to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terror group.

Reposted With Permission From Freedom Outpost

 

 

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Religion

Court Rules the Bible is ‘Incompatible with Human Dignity’ Over Transgender Opposition

A recent court case that ended in a ruling that Christianity is “incompatible with human dignity.”

Published

on

They are coming for your freedoms and your religion, Christians. No better example of that can be found than the recent court case that ended in a ruling that Christianity is “incompatible with human dignity.”

A British court ruled that the Christian Bible is a distinct evil because of its supposed opposition to the mental health problem that is transgenderism.

Yes, it is a British court, but do not make the mistake to imagine that radical transgender activists are not looking at this outcome and looking for a way to replicate it here in the U.S.A.

The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by Dr. David Mackereth, a doctor in the UK National Health Service for 26 years, who was fired for the crime of refusing to call a biological man a woman.

But the court decided to go much farther than merely ruling if the Dr. has grounds and instead launched a full force attack on the Bible and the doctor’s Christian religion.

Mackereth told the court that when his administrators called him on the carpet for refusing to use the transgender person’s “correct pronoun,” he was also attacked for his Christian beliefs.

In short order, the experienced doctor was fired for standing on his religious principles.

According to Daily Wire, the doctor’s attorney, Michael Phillips, told the court, “His belief in the truth of the Bible, and in particular, the truth of Genesis 1:27: ‘So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.’ It follows that every person is created by God as either male or female. A person cannot change their sex/gender at will. Any attempt at, or pretense of, doing so, is pointless, self-destructive, and sinful.”

Mackereth openly admitted that he felt transgenderism is “rebellion against God.” But he also said he has no doubt that some people sincerely feel they are trapped in the wrong body and he feels sympathy for them. Still, he added that the current trend toward pushing people into transgenderism is political, not scientific.

But the court went on the attack, Daily Wire continued:

The court’s ruling stated: “Belief in Genesis 1:27, lack of belief in transgenderism and conscientious objection to transgenderism in our judgment are incompatible with human dignity and conflict with the fundamental rights of others, specifically here, transgender individuals.” The court added. “… in so far as those beliefs form part of his wider faith, his wider faith also does not satisfy the requirement of being worthy of respect in a democratic society, not incompatible with human dignity and not in conflict with the fundamental rights of others.”

The doctor says that he intends to appeal the decision.

“I believe that I have to appeal in order to fight for the freedom of Christians – and any other NHS member of staff – to speak the truth. If they cannot, then freedom of speech has died in this country, with serious ramifications for the practice of medicine in the UK,” he said.

This is what the left wants to replicate here, folks. Do not doubt it.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Continue Reading

Religion

Court Orders Univ. of Iowa Admins to Pay Costs for Anti-Christian Discrimination Suit

Several officers of the University of Iowa have been ordered to pay out of their own pockets for discriminating against a Christain student group.

Published

on

A vice president and several other officers of the University of Iowa have been ordered to personally pay out of their own pockets for costs associated with a religious discrimination lawsuit after they tossed a Christian student group off the campus for supposedly discriminating against gays.

A federal court ruled that the officials violated the student group’s rights to religious freedom. The ruling also left open the possibility that the University’s president, Bruce Harreld, could also be held liable, according to Becket Law.

Indeed, the university didn’t just kick the Christian student group off the campus, they also eliminated student groups headed by Sikhs, Muslims, and Latter-day Saints.

The university took the actions at the behest of the transgender and LGBTQ student groups who complained that that the religious-based groups barred gays from being officers in their clubs.

The Christian club, called InterVarsity, has been on the Iowa campus for more than 25 years.

InterVarsity also operates on 77 college campuses across the country.

InterVarsity welcomes anyone as a member but requires its club officers to follow certain religious strictures. But last year, the university suddenly began taking actions against the club over its religious requirements despite 25 years of allowing the club to operate along the same rules.

The university began limiting the club’s movements on campus, then even froze the club’s bank account., and finally told students that the club was being canceled for “lack of interest,” all because it would not allow gays to take offices in the club.

But the group argued that it could not operate legitimately if it was forced to break its own beliefs.

“We must have leaders who share our faith,” said Greg Jao, Director of External Relations at InterVarsity Christian Fellowship/USA. “No group—religious or secular—could survive with leaders who reject its values. We’re grateful the court has stopped the University’s religious discrimination, and we look forward to continuing our ministry on campus for years to come.”

The student group’s lawyer celebrated the decision:

In upholding the group’s right to be on campus, the court noted that, just last January—in the related case of BLinC v. University of Iowa—it already warned the University against enforcing its policy unevenly. The court stated it “would never have expected the University to respond to that order by homing in on religious groups” like InterVarsity, while “carving out explicit exemptions for other groups. But here we are.” The court did “not know how a reasonable person could have concluded this was acceptable,” since it “plainly” doubled down on the exact same conduct the court had already held unlawful. In a hearing last week, the court described the University’s conduct as “ludicrous” and “incredibly baffling.”

“It’s too bad it took twice for the University to learn its lesson,” said Daniel Blomberg, senior counsel at Becket. “There was no excuse the first time for squashing students’ First Amendment rights. University officials nationwide should now take note that religious discrimination will hit them in the pocketbook.”

This ruling is definitely a strike in favor of religious freedom against the cancel-culture leftists who want everyone to bow to the radical gay agenda.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Continue Reading

Religion

A New Battle in Fredericksburg, Virginia

My Irish-American blood recoils whenever I hear the word “Fredericksburg.” So many young Irishmen were sent to an early death because of the slaughter there.

Published

on

By Jerry Newcombe, D.Min.

My Irish-American blood recoils whenever I hear the word “Fredericksburg.” So many young Irishmen were sent to a needless early death because of the slaughter that occurred in that Virginia city 53 miles south of Washington, D. C., during the American Civil War in December 1862.

The forces of Robert E. Lee grabbed the high ground at Fredericksburg and waited. By the time the Union forces got there, the best they could do was just recklessly send wave after wave of young soldiers (including many Irishmen) to their deaths. Lee reportedly said then, “It is well that war is so terrible—otherwise we would grow too fond of it.”

Now there’s a new battle brewing in Fredericksburg. Of far less consequence, of course. This one doesn’t involve bullets and artillery, but Bibles and arguments.

There’s a retirement community in Fredericksburg that wants to evict a retired Lutheran minister (in his 80s) and his wife if he continues to hold Bible studies there, which many of the residents have asked him to do.

For my radio show, I interviewed attorney Lea Patterson of First Liberty Institute, which bills itself as the largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to protecting religious liberty.

Patterson said that Ken Hauge and his wife moved into a retirement community in early 2017. Because he’s a retired minister, some of the residents asked if he could start a Bible study there. He agreed.

Patterson told me that they started out meeting in an apartment. Then they wanted to meet in the community room, which is used for baby showers, bingo games, knitting clubs, and so on. The management was reluctant to grant that request, and it took the rest of 2017 before they were able to get permission to meet in the community room.

Management initially wanted the Bible study to be called a “Book Review.” They used the room for a few months, but Patterson told me, “in July [2018], the management issued a new policy declaring that residents could not use the community room for religious purposes. Now on the same day of that policy, the management sent Ken and his wife a notice threatening to evict them if Ken continued to lead Bible study.”

First Liberty sent a letter to the retirement home and received no response. Two months later, they sent a letter  to HUD, wherein they accused the retirement home of a “pattern of religious discrimination.” This not only included trying to shut down Rev. Hauge’s Bible study, but also “penalizing and prohibiting residents from audibly saying grace at resident social dinners, and adopting a policy prohibiting residents from engaging in religious activity in Evergreens’ Community Room.”

The letter adds that “several Evergreens residents attempted to interfere with the Bible study on several occasions. At least one of these residents harassed and verbally abused Hauge and other Bible study attendees on the basis of their religious beliefs and practice. For example, this individual has confronted Hauge in the hallway and subjected him to profane rants concerning the Bible study.”

Patterson told me in the interview, “The rub seems to be that there are a few other residents who are offended by the religious content of the Bible study, and that’s where the problem seems to be coming from. I know that an apartment complex has a responsibility to balance the interests of its residents, but it has to do so in a way that conforms to the requirements of the law.”

The First Liberty letter cites chapter and verse from the law, which prohibits discrimination “against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of the sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection therewith, because of . . . religion”

Ironically, liberals are always saying things like, “If you don’t like the porn on TV, change the channel or turn it off.” But these Christophobes were horrified at the idea of a peaceful Bible study going on down the hall. You would think that these people who are soon going to meet their Maker and give an account for their lives might want to make peace with Him beforehand. But apparently not.

Patterson told me, “No one is forcing anybody to go [to the Bible study]. It’s open to anyone who wants to come; and if someone doesn’t want to, they don’t have to…..It just seems like the strangest sort of case…The idea of someone being threatened with losing their home [in their twilight years] because they just want to hold a Bible study with friends.”

Patterson noted that the founding fathers certainly never set out to create a “religion-free world,” but rather a free one. I certainly pray and hope that First Liberty wins the new battle in Fredericksburg.

###

Jerry Newcombe, D.Min., is an on-air host/senior producer for D. James Kennedy Ministries. He has written/co-written 30 books, e.g., The Unstoppable Jesus Christ, American Amnesia: Is American Paying the Price for Forgetting God?, What If Jesus Had Never Been Born? (w/ D. James Kennedy) & the bestseller, George Washington’s Sacred Fire (w/ Peter Lillback)   djkm.org  @newcombejerry      www.jerrynewcombe.com

Continue Reading

Religion

Farrakhan: I’m Not an Anti-Semite. I’m ‘Anti-Termite’

Published

on

“So when they talk about Farrakhan, call me a hater, you know they do, call me an antisemite — stop it! I’m anti-termite! I don’t know nothing about hating somebody because of their religious preference.”

No violation, so says Twitter… This guy is still on tweeting away but conservatives like me get a permanently banned without a warning or a real reason and without any recourse whatsoever!

 

Breitbart:

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan addressed a gathering in Detroit on Sunday to mark the 23rd anniversary of the Million Man March, and used it as a platform to launch yet another attack on Jews, calling them “termites.”

Farrakhan posted clips of his speech to his Twitter account on Tuesday.

“To the members of the Jewish community that don’t like me, thank you very much for putting my name all over the planet … I’m not mad at you, ’cause you’re so stupid,” Farrakhan said.

“So when they talk about Farrakhan, call me a hater, you know they do, call me an antisemite — stop it! I’m anti-termite! I don’t know nothing about hating somebody because of their religious preference.”

Farrahkan also spoke out against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. More

Hot Air:

Some conservatives on Twitter are wondering why the clip below, posted by Farrakhan’s own account, isn’t grounds for being banned from the platform. Fair question. Fair enough, in fact, that Twitter HQ might end up agreeing, if only to blunt the recurring accusations of a double standard in this case. If it stays up, though, the reason is that because Farrakhan has many admirers among black Americans he qualifies as “progressive” no matter how much Goebbels-style bilge about vermin might escape his lips. There’s no other explanation for why Bill Clinton would have felt comfortable appearing onstage with him six weeks ago. If Democrats, particularly black Democrats, say Farrakhan’s okay then he’s okay. Next subject. More

 

Farrakhan and his followers have routinely referred to Jews as termites. Termites are destructive insects that bore from within and are exterminated when found. So what do you think he means? Please comment below and let us know your thoughts.

Continue Reading

Religion

College Offering New Class on Fitting ‘Queer Theory’ Into Christian Bible

A new course is now being offered by Pomona College in which the Bible is strained through a gay perspective so that Christianity can be turned “queer.”

Published

on

A new course is now being offered by Pomona College in which the Bible is strained through a gay perspective so that Christianity can be turned into a “queer” religion.

Pomona is offering “Queer Theory and the Bible” for the coming 2019 semester and the class reportedly falls under “Religious Studies” at the school.

The Claremont, California, college calls its class a way to “queer” the Bible saying, “This process of queering will allow and require us to approach the biblical text in new ways.”

According to Campus Reform:

“Queer Theory and the Bible” will teach students how to read the Bible “through queer theory,” by examining excerpts that are “central to prohibitions on homosexuality,” as well as “discourses of heteronormativity” through which “homophobic readings of the Bible” are born.

“We will also look at the ways in which these discourses and the identities they shore up can be ‘queered,’ as well as at biblical texts that can be read as queer friendly,” the course description reads. “This process of queering will allow and require us to approach the biblical text in new ways.”

The course is classified as a “Religious Studies” course and as such satisfies Pomona’s “Analyzing Difference” category of general education requirements. Students who take “Queer Theory and the Bible” will earn one credit.

Pomona student Daniel Silverman told Campus Reform that the requirement “meets a certain demand on campus.”

“The overall socio-political environment among both students and faculty at Pomona lies deep into the left of the political spectrum,” he explained. “As I see it, ‘Queer Theory and the Bible’ and other similar classes related to gender theory exist because there is a high demand among students to enroll in those courses.”

In other words, the class aims to re-write the Christian religion to push the radical gay agenda.

Interestingly, Silverman admits that our system of (mis)education has a bias against a conservative viewpoint because he noted that the class would probably be better served if it was taught with the balance of a more traditional, conservative Christian class in order to “enrich the dialogue and discussion within the course.”

However, he doubted that it would be a viable model because no one would sign up for the new course.

“I will note that if the course was co-taught with a conservative professor, I imagine that fewer Pomona students would enroll in it than otherwise, as students on campus, in general, don’t seem interested in learning from conservative professors,” Silverman wrote

But Silverman went on to celebrate that the “queering” of the Bible was a serious educational study of the Bible instead of the left-wing propaganda that it really is.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Continue Reading

Religion

City of Atlanta Loses: Must Pay $1.2 Million to Fire Chief Fired Over His Christian Views

Former Atlanta fire chief Kelvin Cochran was fired by the city in 2015 because of a book he published where he expressed his Christian views.

Published

on

Former fire chief Kelvin Cochran was fired by the city of Atlanta, Georgia, in 2015 because of a book he published where he expressed his Christian views. Now the city will have to pay Cochran a $1.2 million settlement.

After two years of fighting the city, a Federal District Court ruled in December 2017 that the city’s policies leading to Cochran’s firing were unconstitutional. Now, after many more months of stalling, the city has reached a settlement.

As Fox News reported:

The city of Atlanta has settled a lawsuit with a former fire chief over his firing for a book containing passages which some saw as anti-gay.

The Atlanta City Council approved a settlement agreeing to pay fired Atlanta fire chief Kelvin Cochran $1.2 million.

In 2013, Cochran wrote a book about his Christian faith titled “Who Told You That You Were Naked?” for a men’s Bible study and gave it to around a dozen subordinates he said had either requested copies or shared his beliefs

The city said that the court ruling left them no choice:

A spokesperson for the City of Atlanta said that “based upon findings of the Court that could have resulted in tax payers paying millions of dollars in damages and litigation fees negotiated settlement was recommended by legal counsel.”

“Our Administration remains committed to achieving One Atlanta—a city that is fair, just and inclusive,” the spokesperson told FOX 5. “The City is developing the first LGBTQ employee resource group to support our City employees. The hiring of the City’s first-ever, full-time LGBTQ affairs coordinator, the establishment of the Mayor’s LGBTQ Advisory Board and the funding of the City’s first Office of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion are also examples of our commitment to ensuring that Atlanta remains a welcoming city for all.

As CBN News reported:

Cochran’s career had been about protecting others. For 30 years, he did that as a firefighter. He served as the US Fire Administrator under President Barack Obama and led the City of Atlanta to attain the highest level of fire and rescue preparedness for the first time in its history.

But that came to an end in 2015, when the City of Atlanta fired him because he wrote a men’s devotional book in his spare time – a book that briefly mentions his views on a biblical understanding of marriage and sexuality.

As CBN News reported, the city did not approve of Chief Cochran’s book. After a 30-day suspension without pay, in order to complete “sensitivity training,” and an investigation into his conduct (which showed he had never discriminated against anyone in the fire department), his career came to an end in Atlanta.

This led Cochran to embark on a three-year legal battle that he says was never just about him.

“The government can’t force its employees to get its permission before they engage in free speech. It also can’t fire them for exercising that First Amendment freedom, causing them to lose both their freedom and their livelihoods,” said ADF Senior Counsel Kevin Theriot in a press release. “We are very pleased that the city is compensating Chief Cochran as it should, and we hope this will serve as a deterrent to any government that would trample upon the constitutionally protected freedoms of its public servants.”

Well, looks like Mr. Cochran is right, after all.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Continue Reading

Religion

German Catholic Church Accused of Covering Up Child Abuse by 1,670 Clergymen

A leaked report notes that the German Catholic Church establishment tried to cover up the child abuse allegedly committed by 1,670 clergymen.

Published

on

A leaked report notes that the German Catholic Church establishment tried to cover up the child abuse allegedly committed by 1,670 clergymen.

The report, leaked by the German media outlets Der Spiegel and Die Zeit on Sept. 12, alleges that the church covered up 3,677 cases of sexual abuse from 2014 and stretching back all the way to 1946.

According to CNSNews:

Most of the victims were younger than 14 years old. Most were boys.

In many cases, according to Der Spiegel reporter Walter Mayr, “the accused clergymen were moved to another location, without the new parish being given ‘the pertinent information’ about the abuser.”

Out of the 1,670 alleged abusers, the Church only laicized 41 priests and excommunicated 81, and only placed drastic sanctions on 7.8% of the abusers, according to LifeSiteNews.

As LifeSiteNews wrote, “The report shows that many abusing priests were simply transferred to other parishes and that only one-third of them were ever investigated by the Church.”

According to Die Zeit reporter Evelyn Finger, the Church’s chosen punishments were “less than fitting.”

Finger said that the Church “chose rather soft punishments such as early retirement, interdiction to celebrate Mass, therapy, leave of absence, reprimand, low fees, or just simply retreats.”

The German media also noted that the majority of abusive Church officials showed “no signs of repentance.”

In fact, the report claimed that up to eight percent of the clergy was found to be abusers.

The research team claimed to have investigated 38,000 members of church hierarchy.

Worse, according to LifeSite News, the German bishops sought to gain the right to forbid the release of the report and asked the German government to prevent the publication of the report.

Still, the German Church released an apology on September 25:

“Those who are guilty must be punished,” Cardinal Reinhard Marx, chairman of the German Bishops’ Conference, said at a news conference to launch the report in the city of Fulda.

“For too long in the church we have looked away, denied, covered up and didn’t want it to be true,” he added.

“All this must not remain without consequences. Those affected are entitled to justice,” Marx said, without specifying what consequences perpetrators might face.

“For all the failure, pain and suffering, I must apologize as the chairman of the Bishops’ Conference as well as personally,” he said.

“The study .. makes it clear to us that the Catholic Church has by no means overcome the issue of dealing with the sexual abuse of minors.”

The report, though is sure to continue to create questions.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Pin It on Pinterest