Marco Rubio is a big, dumb idiot. His participation in the bipartisan group of senators known as the Gang of 8, formed to draft immigration-reform legislation, is moronic.
The first clue for Rubio that this Gang, like the majority of gangs, is bad news should have been the only clue needed, and that is that Sen. Chuck Schumer is on Rubio’s side. That’s not just a red flag, that’s a screaming siren. If Chuck Schumer supports Rubio’s plan, then he, Schumer–a well-practiced politician to Rubio’s rookiehood–must know, or at least believe, that this plan will ultimately help Democrats.
Here’s something I’ve never said before: Schumer is right. As Rubio explains it, he will only support what amounts to amnesty if our Mexican border is first secured. His support is “dependent” on securing the border, okay? But the first step in his and his gang’s legislation is the legalization of the roughly 11 million illegals already here. So there goes the “dependent on border security” claim.
I understand where Rubio is coming from–recognition that Republicans need to be more appealing to Hispanics to win their votes–but he’s a big, dumb idiot if he thinks the borders will be made secure after Democrats have gotten a taste of approximately 11 million new voters.
Plus, Republicans will not get credit for the amnesty in the Gang of 8’s proposal, because it will be noted that other congressional Republicans had to be dragged kicking and screaming to vote for it (if they do vote for it). In addition, as noted at National Review, John McCain had “an established record for supporting amnesty [but] could not muster one in three votes from…Hispanic citizens” in the 2008 elections.
Rush Limbaugh once proposed an amnesty plan that I can get behind: we’ll grant pardon for their crimes of trespassing (amnesty in a nutshell), but all those who receive that pardon will be prohibited from voting for 25 years. Though I’d go even a step further: Those illegals broke the law, so they need a penalty. Amnesty removes that penalty. And the only reason Democrats want amnesty is because they’ll gain 11 million new voters and 11 million new people dependent on and beholden to the government. So what I would say to an illegal is, fine, you’ll get your amnesty, but the penalty for your crime, since you received no penalty otherwise, is no voting rights at all. Of course not one single Democrat, as a member of that Party that pretends to care about the well-being of the illegals here, will vote for the well-being of illegals if it means those illegals can’t vote. “Screw their well-being, I want votes!”
Rubio’s big-dumb-idiocy is a sobering reminder that no politician is perfect. Heck, even Ronald Reagan dabbled in amnesty. Rubio needs to learn the ways of Washington without becoming a Washingtonian. If he believes a Democrat’s promise to secure the border after enacting amnesty, he is far too naive to be a presidential candidate in 2016.
Become an insider!
Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.
SWAT Team Raids Texas Bar, Makes Arrests After Owner Defied Government Orders
Ector County Sheriff Mike Griffis said during a news conference that the owner of Big Daddy Zane’s opened her business even though Gov. Abbott explicitly mandated that bars remain closed.
Ector County Sheriff’s SWAT team raiding a peaceful protest at Big Daddy Zane’s in West Odessa. The bar opened this afternoon despite Abbott’s latest orders, saying “all businesses are essential.”
— JuYeon Kim (@JuYeonKimTV) May 5, 2020
When police arrived they found six men in body armor and armed with rifles standing outside the establishment.
“This was not a protest of their second amendment rights. It was a show of force to ensure this lady could violate the governor’s order,” Griffis told reporters.
The owner along with the seven armed men were arrested.
County Sheriffs are elected officials, whose duty is to protect the CITIZENS who elected them;NOT to be lackeys to an overreaching government. If we can’t trust our current local Sheriffs to stand for US, we need to clean house &elect better ones.
— Arizonageri (@arizonageri) May 5, 2020
And this is how quickly it can be implemented. Scarey AF ?
— ?#Trump2020 ?? (@kelleyh1961) May 5, 2020
@TheJusticeDept found some of those abuses of power and violations of civil rights you were looking for.
— Dan (@LawoftheGator) May 5, 2020
When I was in Iraq, we were lucky to have 1 MRAP with us while on patrol. Most of us in regular Humvee’s. Why on God’s green earth does a sheriff department have an MRAP??? Did I miss the part where the sheriff dept. was plagued by IED’s on American streets?
— Wolf_In_Waiting (@Sheepdog_89) May 5, 2020
The Constitution prohibits military operating against its own citizenry.
militarization of the police force began after LA bank robbery incident gone bad.
S.W.A.T was never intended to be used against unarmed citizens.
This unit should be forcibly dismantled by the DOJ.
— ? Shawn Taylor (@staylormusic) May 5, 2020
Texas AG Paxton called for the release of a jailed hair salon owner who reopened her shop despite state orders, and issued a blistering rebuke of a judge’s apparent political “stunt.”
“The trial judge did not need to lock up Shelley Luther,” Paxton wrote, according to NBC DFW. “His order is a shameful abuse of judicial discretion, which seems like another political stunt in Dallas.”
President Trump Signs Anti-Robocall Legislation Into Law
Now, what am I going to do about my expired automobile warranty?
The White House announced on Monday that President Donald Trump had signed S. 151, the Pallone-Thune TRACED Act, which will prevent criminal robocalls.
Yesterday, the President signed the TRACED Act in to law, legislation advanced by @ProbSolveCaucus. This is a major step forward to relieve Americans from the nuisance of spam robocalls, and will enhance law enforcement efforts to crack down on violators. https://t.co/qgIqaNSQhx
— Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (@RepBrianFitz) December 31, 2019
The White House:
This historic legislation will provide American consumers with even greater protection against annoying unsolicited robocalls. American families deserve control over their communications, and this legislation will update our laws and regulations to stiffen penalties, increase transparency, and enhance government collaboration to stop unwanted solicitation. President Donald J. Trump is proud to have worked with Congress to get this bipartisan legislation to his desk, and even prouder to sign it into law today.
The FTC explained: “A robocall trying to sell you something is illegal unless a company has your written permission to call you that way. To get your permission, the company has to be clear it’s asking to call you with robocalls, and it can’t make you agree to the calls to get a product or service. If you give permission, you have the right to change your mind later.”
Senator John Thune:
I have yet to meet someone who says they enjoy receiving those unwanted and illegal robocalls that plague our phones, whether we’re at home, at work, or in the car, which is why the TRACED Act takes several important steps in the fight to curb this scourge. This bill represents a unique legislative effort that is not only bipartisan at its core, but it’s nearly unanimously supported in Congress. Most importantly, this is a significant win for consumers in every corner of the country, and it finally and officially puts illegal robocallers on notice. While no process is perfect, I’m glad we were able to work together with Republicans and Democrats, senators and members of the House to reach this important compromise, which, once signed into law, will begin to make an important down payment on the fight against illegal robocalls.”
Muslim Woman Awarded $120,000 After Police Removed Her Hijab For Mugshot
A Muslim woman in Minnesota who was allegedly forced to remove her hijab for mugshot gets a $120,000 settlement.
In 2013, Aida Shyef Al-Kadi turned herself in after a warrant was issued for her arrest because of a missed court hearing over a traffic ticket. She described her treatment in custody as “one of the most humiliating and harmful experiences” of her life.
Absolutely absurd. https://t.co/k3Ckc5msy2
— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) December 24, 2019
A court awarded a Muslim woman a $120,000 settlement after police forced her to remove her hijab in front of male jailers for a mugshot in 2013.
Aida Shyef Al Kadi, who was born in Ohio and moved to Minnesota so her child could receive special medical care, was arrested after a judge issued a warrant for Al Kadi because she failed to appear in court for a traffic violation. After turning herself in, Al Kadi was ordered to remove her hijab and abaya, a dress that covers the body, in front of male jailers at the Ramsey County jail.
U.S. District Court Judge John Tunheim awarded the settlement last week after Al Kadi sued Ramsey County for violating her constitutional rights and appeared with lawyers at the Minnesota headquarters of the Council on American-Islamic Relations earlier this month.
“It was one of the most humiliating and harmful experiences of my life,” said Al Kadi. “I knew that I did not want any other Muslim woman to experience what I did.”
Al Kadi initially refused to remove her hijab and was allowed to take the religious clothing off in a separate cell in front of a single male jailer. She agreed to remove the clothing after receiving assurances that the photos would not appear online. More
Twitter chimes in:
— All American ??⭐️?? (@Redtowel4) December 24, 2019
Mug shots are used to identify people for the record, there are no exceptions. We can have a debate about public release without conviction, but there should be no special treatment.
— Smells Like Teen Statism??❄️☧ (@AgentEightSix) December 24, 2019
Islam/Sharia is incompatible with Western culture and the US Constitution.
We all get mug shots the same way. If they don’t like it, too bad.
— AtomicMountain (@AtomicMountain) December 24, 2019
So no separation of church & state when muslims are involved ? Can satanists keep hood & cowl on ? If i decide my religion requires i wear a mask in public will it be honored ? Thought Lady Justice was blind ? Guess not
— Hera Johnson (@johnson_hera) December 24, 2019
Why are these people afforded privileges no other groupis given?
— AUGal (@tina_pynes) December 24, 2019
This needs to stop….we get patted down at the Airport she can remove her headscraf
— Itismetammyb (@itismetammyb) December 24, 2019
I had to take my sunglasses off at the bank. Can I sue?
— Kate ?Trump 2020! ???? (@IrishTexan2009) December 24, 2019
Virginia Democrats File Proposals To Begin “Confiscation” Of Lawfully Owned Firearms
Virginia Democrats are filing proposals to confiscate legally-owned firearms according to a second amendment reporter.
Virginia Democrats now have a majority in the state legislature and Governor Northam has committed to passing gun control measures.
Virginia Democrats Filing Proposals To Begin ‘Confiscation’ Of Lawfully Owned Firearms, Second Amendment Reporter Says https://t.co/zWlwzUnilA
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) December 3, 2019
After taking complete control of the state, Virginia Democrats are beginning to enact their left-wing agenda to undermine Americans’ constitutionally protected Second Amendment rights.
The legislative action comes after leftist Virginia Democrat Governor Ralph Northam announced at the beginning of last month that Democrats “will at least start” their attempts to restrict Virginian’s constitutional rights by “banning the sale of [semi-automatic firearms] and high-capacity magazines, restoring the law that limits purchases to one gun a month, and a red flag law that would empower a court to temporarily remove a gun from a person deemed to be a risk to himself or others,” The Washington Post reported.
When Northam was asked about confiscating firearms from law-abiding citizens, the governor responded, “that’s something I’m working [on] with our secretary of public safety.”
Free Beacon Second Amendment reporter Stephen Gutowski noted the proposed legislation on Monday, tweeting: “Meanwhile Virginia Democrats are filing bills to make the possession of millions of currently-owned firearms illegal. SB16 bans possession of many rifles without any grandfathering provision which means it’s confiscation.”
Meanwhile Virginia Democrats are filing bills to make the possession of millions of currently-owned firearms illegal. SB16 bans possession of many rifles without any grandfathering provision which means it’s confiscation. https://t.co/i0SnJNDTxm https://t.co/j6DaJAj7g2
— Stephen Gutowski (@StephenGutowski) December 2, 2019
Virginia’s elected officials swore to uphold the constitution, now that they broke that oath the people of Virginia should impeach each and every one of them.
Then the feds need to arrest them, prosecute them and convict them for civil rights violations. Let them do time in federal prison. That’s the only way this will stop.
Remember when they said common sense gun control doesn’t mean we will take your guns away…… it’s crystal clear now their intent, the only question remains will law abiding citizens stand by as their constitutional rights are stripped away. https://t.co/nhBMRfLemZ
— Melanie (@mefbama) December 3, 2019
Illinois Set to Revolutionize War on Drugs with Common Sense Marijuana Legislation
It seems as though Illinois is finally learning the lessons of prohibition, nearly a century removed from the violence and corruption instigated by gangsters such as Al Capone.
Americans have dealt with prohibition before, most famously during the first few decades of the 20th century, in relation to the “scourge” of alcohol on this nation.
Then, we had the temperance movement, whose hard-line, teetotaling ethos bludgeoned the “land of the free” into outlawing booze. Much like the restrictive gun laws we see in liberal locales today, this prohibiting of firearms has only accomplished one thing: Putting law-abiding citizens at a disadvantage.
Soon, gangsters, rumrunners, and thugs were running amok, selling booze made either dangerously and illegally, or imported secretly from Canada. The attempted enforcement of prohibition turned into a bloodbath, and soon, the nation rescinded their virtue-signaling attempt to ban alcohol.
American marijuana laws in the 21st century are slowly catching up to those lessons of nearly a century ago, with Illinois, of all places, working to lead the way.
When lawmakers crafted the law legalizing marijuana in Illinois, they tried to make sure it would right what many see as past wrongs linked to the drug.
In addition to expunging hundreds of thousands of criminal records for marijuana arrests and convictions, the law’s architects added provisions meant to benefit communities that have been the most adversely affected by law enforcement’s efforts to combat the drug.
The so-called social equity provisions are expected to help black applicants, in particular, as blacks are nearly four times as likely as whites to be arrested for marijuana, the American Civil Liberties Union found. The law, which takes effect Jan. 1, also established ways for qualified applicants to pay lower licensing fees and get business loans and technical assistance. And it earmarked part of marijuana sales revenue for neighborhood development grants.
“On the surface, its tone and what it’s trying to do is ahead of any state that’s done this. They’re really setting off in the right way,” said Kayvan Khalatbari, a board member of Minority Cannabis Business Association, which has composed model laws outlining social equity programs. He added that follow-through will be key: “We can’t just set this in motion and set it free.”
Companies that apply for a license to sell marijuana will be judged on a 250-point scale, and those that qualify as social equity applicants will get a 50-point bump.
Not only will these laws take a great deal of power and money out of the hands of Illinois’ violent black market, but they will also spur on an entrepreneurial boom in the midwestern rust belt.
Well over half of the states in the nation currently allow for some form of legal or decriminalized use of cannabis.
Democrats Furious: President Trump to Receive Justice Award from Black Justice Group
Liberals are furious that President Donald Trump is about to be awarded the “Bipartisan Justice Award” by a prestigious black justice group.
Liberals are furious that President Donald Trump is about to be awarded the “Bipartisan Justice Award” by a prestigious black justice group for his work on criminal justice reform.
Trump will receive the award at the 2019 Second Step Presidential Justice Forum being held at Benedict College in Columbia, South Carolina, by the 20/20 Bipartisan Justice Center, a group founded by twenty black Republicans and twenty black Democrats back in 2015, according to the Daily Caller.
The annual dinner recognizes a public servant who has reached across the aisle to work on matters of criminal justice.
The White House released a celebratory press release about the award, saying:
The Bipartisan Justice Award is the highest honor given annually to a public servant who has demonstrated the ability to work across the aisle to achieve meaningful progress in reforming our criminal justice system. The 2019 Bipartisan Justice award winner is President Donald J. Trump for his Bipartisan leadership in the passage of the historic First Step Act. The award is being given by the 20/20 Bipartisan Justice Center, a non-profit organization founded by 20 Black Republicans and 20 Black Democrats in 2015, to elevate the issue of criminal justice reform above partisan politics.
Even more galling for liberals, many of the Democrat candidates for president will be in attendance at the event and will have to sit squirming in their chairs as Trump gets his award.
On Friday, Pres Trump makes first visit to a historically black college when he addresses the "Second Step" forum on criminal justice reform at Benedict College in Columbia, SC. He speaks on Friday. The Democratic presidential candidates invited over the weekend.
— Mark Knoller (@markknoller) October 25, 2019
According to the Daily Caller:
The following Democrats are set to attend the forum: Maryland Rep. John Delaney, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, California Sen. Kamala Harris, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, former Vice President Joe Biden, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, former HUD Secretary Julian Castro, and Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as well as Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Beto O’Rourke is also reportedly scheduled to attend.
Previous honorees include, Democratic New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, Republican Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, and Republican West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito.
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @WTHuston.
Gen. Flynn Attorney Files Surprise Request for Content of Joseph Mifsud Devices
The attorney for General Michael Flynn dropped a bombshell with a request to learn the contents of electronic devices owned by Joseph Mifsud.
The attorney for General Michael Flynn dropped a bombshell with a request to learn the contents of electronic devices owned by Joseph Mifsud, a mysterious figure at the heart of the government’s case against the general and other members of the Trump administration the government has been targeting.
Mifsud is someone the media has been utterly ignoring, and attorney Sidney Powell’s filing to compel the release of the information on the man’s devices comes as a shock because few even knew that the Department of Justice even possessed any of Mifsud’s devices.
Powell’s filing revealed that the DOJ had somehow come into possession of two of Mifsud’s electronic devices. [See filing here]
The filing introduced on Wednesday demands access to the information on the devices: “The information is material, exculpatory, and relevant to the defense of Mr. Flynn, and specifically to the ‘OCONUS LURES’ and agents that western intelligence tasked against him likely as early as 2014 to arrange — unbeknownst to him ‘connections’ with certain Russians that they would then use against him n their false claims.”
This information may hold information proving that “western intelligence” agencies hired Mifsud to illicitly target the Trump campaign.
But until now, the public was not aware that the DOJ even had these devices. We still don’t know where these devices came from. We have some information that one was manufactured in 2011 and the other in 2014.
Furthermore, the media (and the government) has been claiming that this Mifsud character is a “Russian intelligence agent.” But, doesn’t the fact that the DOJ has these devices mean that claim may be in doubt?
U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr flew to Italy to review a taped deposition of Joseph Mifsud in September. This all indicates that Mifsud is far more integral to all this than we were previously told.
The DOJ responded to Powell’s filing, saying if there is anything “relevant to sentencing” on the devices, they would provide it to the general’s defense team.
Mifsud is already known to have lied to the FBI about his actions in this case. Rep. Jim Jordan (R, OH) has already highlighted this fact:
Why didn't Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud for lying to the FBI? pic.twitter.com/34E6TSigcM
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) July 24, 2019
Rep. Devin Nunes (R, CA) has also claimed that the FBI “has something to hide” about its interactions with Mifsud.
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.
Letter Threatens To Burn Homes Of New Hampshire Trump Supporters
"Your address has been added to our database as a target when we attack should Trump not concede the election."
Watch Giuliani Read Text Message From Hunter To Joe Biden Talking About FaceTiming 14-Year-Old Girl Naked While Smoking Crack
Rudy Giuliani: Well, here is a very, very sensitive one. It’s a text message to his father in which he...
BIAS MUCH? Twitter and Facebook Censor Trump 65 Times, Never Censor Biden Even Once
Proving their bias, Facebook and Twitter have censored Donald Trump and his campaign 65 times while never once censoring Joe...
Maryland Biden Supporter Fires Shots at Two Men in Truck with Trump Flag
A Kingsville, Maryland, man who was putting Joe Biden signs in his front yard opened fire on a Truck driving...
Study Finds 353 U.S. Counties In 29 States Have Voter Registration Rates That Exceeds 100%
A new Judicial Watch study finds that 353 U.S. Counties in 29 states with voter registration rates exceeding 100% —...
Become an insider
Best of the Month
Coronavirus2 weeks ago
World Health Organization Admits that COVID Not Really Worse than Regular Flu
FBI3 weeks ago
Bombshell New Evidence Links Hillary Clinton to Russian Hoax ‘Plan to Frame’ Trump for ‘Collusion’
Culture4 weeks ago
Conservative Host Dan Bongino Tells Fans a Tumor Has Been Found in His Neck
20204 weeks ago
Pollster with Best Record from 2016 Says Trump is Now Leading, Likely to Win
Christians4 weeks ago
Christians Arrested While Singing Hymns (Video)
Voter Fraud4 weeks ago
Four Texas Democrats Arrested Over Mail-In Ballot Fraud
Media3 weeks ago
Trump Tax Return Hit Piece Fact Checks Itself: He Paid $1 Million in 2016 and $4.2 Million in 2017 to US Treasury
News4 weeks ago
Seattle Rioter Lays Down On The Road To Stop Bike Police… Cop Rolls Right Over Him (Video)
Coronavirus3 weeks ago
HOT MIC! Pennsylvania Democrats Busted Admitting Masks Are Just “Political Theater”
20204 weeks ago
Joe Biden Muffs the Pledge of Allegiance: ‘One Nation, indivisible, Under God, for Real’
20204 weeks ago
Black College Says Biden Lied About Going to School There
Antifa4 weeks ago
Federal Officials Have Quietly Arrested More than 300 Antifa Rioters Since May