Connect with us

Abortion

Judge In Planned Parenthood “Baby Body Parts” Trial Orders Guilty Verdict Against Journalist

This is highly unprecedented and introduces an undue influence on the jury. The judge should be dismissed from the case and a new trial be ordered.

Published

on

Judge In Planned Parenthood “Baby Body Parts” Trial Orders Guilty Verdict Against Journalist

The judge in Planned Parenthood’s baby parts trafficking trial demands jurors find the journalist guilty.

“I have already determined that these defendants trespassed at each of these locations. Because I determined that these defendants trespassed, the law assumes that Planned Parenthood has been harmed and is entitled to an award of nominal damages such as one dollar for each trespass.”

TDC:

The judge in the “Baby Body Parts” trial of activist and journalist David Daleiden has ordered the jury find him guilty of trespassing at Planned Parenthood conferences and clinics — before the jury retired to consider a verdict.

Planned Parenthood is suing Daleiden and his colleagues after they released secretly recorded videos of executives haggling over the sale and price of baby body parts from abortions in their facilities.

Daleiden is contesting all the charges. However, Judge William Orrick told the jury that he has decided to find Daleiden guilty of trespass during his undercover journalism. Daleiden previously lost an attempt to have Judge Orrick removed from the case, alleging he was biased against the defendants.

Trending: POTUS Prepares to Take LITERAL Victory Lap at Daytona 500 After Impeachment Acquittal

Thejudge stated that the jury must find that Daleiden and others “trespassed at the 2014 Forum in Miami, Florida; at the 2015 MeDC meeting in Orlando, Florida; and the 2015 National Conference in Washington, D.C.”

“I have already determined that these defendants trespassed at each of these locations. Because I determined that these defendants trespassed, the law assumes that Planned Parenthood has been harmed and is entitled to an award of nominal damages such as one dollar for each trespass,” he told the jury as the trial comes to a conclusion.

The judge said he had also determined that Daleiden and his colleagues trespassed at the Planned Parenthood Rocky Mountain Center in Colorado and a Planned Parenthood Center in Texas. More

Operation Rescue, whose president sits on the board of the Center for Medical Progress which infiltrated and produced undercover videos exposing the crimes of Planned Parenthood regarding trafficking the body parts of murdered babies, produced the following recap of what has taken place so far as the jury went into deliberations after seven weeks of trial testimony:

Once jury deliberations began, Newman shared his reflections on the blur of events that took place after the initial release of the video series beginning in July 2015:

At once Planned Parenthood went into full-blown attack mode. They hired Fusion GPS, (yes, that Fusion GPS), to discredit the videos. Every news channel parroted the same lines that the videos were “misleading, highly edited, discredited, manipulated.” Planned Parenthood’s public relations firms kicked in to high gear with a media campaign with talking points meant to convince the public that PP does not sell baby parts, babies are not born alive during abortions, and abortion procedures are not modified to get better fetal body parts. Planned Parenthood claimed total innocence and claimed the CMP journalists were the liars.

However, near the end of the trial, Planned Parenthood dropped all demands for reputational damages.  No evidence was provided to show that the videos were altered in any way.  Fusion GPS was never called to testify – because their so-called forensic analysis of the videos was a fraud, just like the fake Steele Dossier that it manufactured to smear President Donald J. Trump.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement

Abortion

Abortion Wild Britain Doubles Deaths of Down’s Syndrome Babies

The abortion-loving UK has kicked into high gear, doubling the number of late term abortions of babies with Down’s Syndrome.

Published

on

The abortion-loving United Kingdom has kicked into high gear, doubling the number of late term abortions of babies with Down’s Syndrome in just ten years.

The UK has clearly turned into an abattoir for people with Down’s Syndrome. In fact, it has been for a long time. The UK passed a law that allows parents to kill their babies right up until birth if the child has a disability.

So, the British government has determined that people with disabilities don’t deserve to live.

According to the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children:

The number of late term abortions carried out past 24 week’s gestation on UK children with Down’s syndrome have doubled in the past 10 years, recent figures have revealed. Michael Robinson, SPUC Director of Communications said: “It is barbaric that a child who may have a disability in the UK can be aborted right up to birth. This practice has no place in a civilised society.”

The recent figures, obtained in response to a parliamentary question by Lord Alton, have revealed that in 2018, the number of UK children aborted past 24 weeks gestation following a possible Down’s syndrome diagnosis increased from 11 in 2009 to 23 in 2018.

In addition, the figures also expose that the number of abortions carried out in the UK following a Down’s syndrome diagnosis have risen by almost 30% over the past decade.

Is this “liberalism”?

Is this how caring liberals are?

Apparently so.

Still, British families that have children with Down’s Syndrome are not sitting idly by.

“Over 1,800 people with Down’s syndrome and their families have signed a letter to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, urging him to insure that abortion for disability will not be permitted in Northern Ireland,” the group reported.

This is what liberals want here, folks.

Make no mistake.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Abortion

Senate Will Vote On Pro-Life Bills To Stop Infanticide And Ban Late-Term Abortions

Why didn’t the Senate do this two years ago when the Republicans had the House?

Published

on

Senate to vote on banning late-term abortion, infanticide.

Family Research Council staffer Patricia Mosley told senators: “There have been no cases involving prosecutions under the [2002] Born-Alive Infants Protection Act that we know of. Why? Because there is currently no federal criminal statute specifically prohibiting taking the lives of born-alive infants.”

LifeNews:

The Senate will soon vote on two major pro-life bills, to ban late-term abortions on babies capable of feeling excruciating pain during abortions and on the Born Alive bill that would stop infanticide and protect babies who survive abortions.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell today filed a procedural motion that would set up a vote for after the Senate takes its President’s Day recess. Once the Senate comes back into session next week, votes could take place on the Pain Capable Unborn Child Act and Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. President Trump has already promised to sign both pro-life bills into law should Congress approve them.

Both pieces of legislation would require a 60-vote threshold since pro-abortion Democrats are likely to filibuster both of them. And the votes on ending the filibuster would give Americans another indication of just how radical two of the leading Democrats running for president are on abortion — Senators Bernie Sanders and Amy Klobuchar. Neither would be expected to vote to end the filibuster and allow votes on either common-sense bill.

The Senate recently held a hearing on the Born Alive bill.

In a hearing called, “The Infant Patient: Ensuring Appropriate Medical Care for Children Born Alive,” Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska made it clear why the bill is needed:

“This hearing is not about overturning Roe v. Wade. In fact, this hearing is not actually about limiting access to abortion at all. This hearing isn’t a debate about third-trimester, or second-trimester, or first-trimester abortion. This hearing is about making sure that every newborn baby has a fighting chance — whether she’s born in a labor and delivery ward or whether she’s born in an abortion clinic.” For once, he urged, can we not “immediately retreat into the fortified and familiar trenches our two parties have occupied for most of the past 47 years?” More

Should babies who survive failed abortions be given the same care as other newborns, or should they be left to die? Should there be any limit on abortions of babies who feel pain? The bills address these questions.

 

Continue Reading

Abortion

Bernie Sanders Finally Admits it: Pro-Life Christians Not Welcome in Democrat Party

Bernie Sanders has finally admitted the obvious truth that if you are a pro-life Christian you are no longer welcome in the Democrat Party.

Published

on

Socialist presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has finally admitted the obvious truth that if you are a pro-life Christian you are no longer welcome in the Democrat Party.

Last Saturday, during an appearance at the radical death cult called NARAL, Sanders admitted that he and his cohorts do not want pro-lifers in the Democrat Party.

The forum was called to discuss so-called “reproductive rights” (not an actual thing), according to New Hampshire Democratic National Committee members Kathy Sullivan and Bill Shaheen. It was aimed at giving candidates the chance to speak on “the threat to our courts and our reproductive rights,” Daily Caller reported.

Naturally, since it was sponsored by the NARAL death cult, every candidate effusively supported the right of women to kill their babies.

But Bernie Sanders went even farther by telling any of the few pro-life Democrats left in the country that they have been ex-communicated from their party.

Bernie was asked about pro-life Democrats. His answer was stark.

Asked if there is “such a thing as a pro-life Democrat in your vision for the party,” Sanders answered that, “I think being pro-choice is an absolutely essential part of being a Democrat.”

Sanders continued saying that he cannot see an argument for opposing abortion. “[W]hen we talk about what a Democrat is, being pro-choice is essential to that vision,” he said.

“If you’re asking me – and I think I may be wrong on this – I think in the Senate, probably 95 percent of the Democrats are pro-choice, the other few are not. In the House, maybe even a higher percentage,” he said. “So that’s kind of what my view is.”

There you have it, America.
If you happen to be a Christian, pro-life Democrat, Bernie Sanders just told you to pound sand.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Abortion

Fox Allows Super Bowl Ad With Drag Queens, Refuse To Approve Pro-Life Commercial

Published

on

Fox is stonewalling a pro-life group from running it’s ‘abortion survivors’ ad on Super Bowl Sunday.

Faces of Choice, a new non-profit whose ad featuring 14 survivors of abortion was shown at the March for Life, say they have been “given the runaround” by Fox for six months.

Life News:

FOX Sports apparently has no problem airing controversial ads during the 2020 Super Bowl — just not a pro-life commercial.

According to NBC News, this year’s big game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the San Francisco 49ers will include a commercial featuring drag queens/LGBTQ activists.

Meanwhile, pro-life advocates with the new Faces of Choice organization said they have been waiting at least six months for an answer from FOX about their ad.

The drag queen ad from Sabra hummus already is stirring up controversy. It features drag queens Kim Chi and Miz Cracker from “RuPaul’s Drag Race.”

LGBTQ marketing strategist Bob Witeck celebrated the significance of the ad, telling NBC:

“For queer audiences, it is an art form and an ‘outsiders’ language,” Witek said of drag. “Reaching the Super Bowl means taking our language into every home in the nation and millions around the world.”

Witeck said the Sabra ad, which could reach around 100 million viewers during the Super Bowl, is indicative of a sea change in the public perception of drag, which he said has been normalized in the mainstream for many years, thanks in large part to the success of the award-winning reality show “RuPaul’s Drag Race.”  More

In the teaser for the ad campaign, Miz Cracker clumsily attempts to put a football helmet on over her sizable wig. “I hope this doesn’t give me helmet hair,” she says, while Kim Chi looks on skeptically.
What goes with hummus? Snacks! That’s why we’ve got Miz Cracker and Kim Chi suiting up for our #SuperBowlLIV commercial on Feb 2! #HairWeGo!

They can air commercials with drag queens but not a pro-life one? What happened to Fox’s claim to be fair and balanced? Bye, Bye Fox Sports!

Here are the stories of abortion survivors:

Continue Reading

Abortion

Buttigieg Tells Woman Her Pro-Life Views Not Welcomed In Democrat Party

Published

on

Democrat presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg refused to tell a Democrat voter that her pro-life views were welcomed in the party after being repeatedly pressed about the issue.

Kristin Day: “I am a proud pro-life Democrat. So, do you want the support of pro-life Democrats, pro-life Democratic voters? There are about 21 million of us, and if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic Party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion really does include everybody?”

TDW:

Democrat presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg refused to tell a Democrat voter on Sunday that her pro-life views were welcomed in the party after being repeatedly pressed about the issue during a Fox News town hall event.

“I am a proud pro-life Democrat,” Kristin Day, a member of the audience, told Buttigieg. “So, do you want the support of pro-life Democrats, pro-life Democratic voters? There are about 21 million of us, and if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic Party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion really does include everybody?”

“Well I respect where you’re coming from and I hope to earn your vote, but I’m not going to try to earn your vote by tricking you,” Buttigieg responded. “I am pro-choice and I believe that a woman ought to be able to make that decision. I know that the difference of opinion that you and I have is one that we have come by honestly and the best that I can offer, and it may win your vote, and if not, I understand, the best I can offer is that if we can’t agree on where to draw the line, the next best thing we can do is agree on who should draw the line and in my view it’s the woman who’s faced with that decision in her own life.” More

Pete Buttigieg articulately said to 21 million pro-life Democrats that he supports the killing of infants up to and including 9 months of gestation and she really doesn’t have a place in their party. If she is sincere she will get out of an organization that doesn’t respect life.

 

Continue Reading

Abortion

Mediaite Claims Trump Told ‘Dangerous Lie’ About Northam’s Infanticide Comment, But Here’s Video Proof

Published

on

President Trump became the first president to appear in person and speak at the “March for Life” and told the crowd that Democratic Virginia Governor Ralph Northam “stated that he would execute a baby after birth.”

Now the truth: “If a mother is in labor…the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians & mother”

Democratic Virginia Governor Ralph Northam was talking about this vile legislation:

Continue Reading

Abortion

Twitter Blacks Out Trump Campaign Video Because it is Pro-Life

Twitter slapped a “sensitive content” warning and grayed out a Trump campaign video all because it is pro-life.

Published

on

Twitter slapped a “sensitive content” warning and grayed out a Trump campaign video all because it is pro-life.

The tweet was also shadow banned by Twitter and blocked from appearing on user’s feeds unless they clicked the “view” button. In most other cases, videos shared to Twitter play automatically.

“We see it in the eyes of every new mother who cradles an innocent newborn child in her loving arms,” the tweet attached to the video read. “Life is the greatest miracle of all. Let us build a culture that cherishes innocent life. #ProLifeVoicesForTrump.”

The video featured a woman looking at an ultrasound, a proud couple holding a baby, and clips of President Donald Trump holding babies and children.

Another caption read, “Defending the Very First Right: Life. Abortion means a living, feeling baby will never get to share their love and dreams with the world. It must change, but our movement can only succeed with the heart and soul and prayer of the people.”

The Trump campaign immediately protested the “sensitive content” ban because the video did not meet any of Twitter’s ‘rules” to deserve the censorship.

According to Twitter’s always fungible rules, videos are marked sensitive if they are “excessively gory or share violent or adult content within live video or in profile or header images.”

Nothing in the campaign video met this criteria.

Trump’s campaign immediately accused Twitter of unfair, partisan censorship.

“Twitter’s censorship of the video launching President Trump’s pro-life coalition is a perfect example of the left stomping on any idea they don’t like,” spokeswoman Kayleigh McEnany said. “This video shows children and families and highlights the sanctity of life. President Trump is the most pro-life President ever and his support for unborn children cannot be silenced.”

Twitter then rescinded the content ban claiming that the notice was placed on the video “in error.”

Isn’t it funny how these “errors” never happen to liberal tweets with liberal content?

The Washington Free Beacon was first to report the content marking.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston. And be sure and check out our great products at RepublicanLegion.com.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider


Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend