Yes, the investigation into the Fast and Furious scandal is still ongoing. Behind the screen of the Democrats shutting down the federal government, Benghazi, IRS targeting conservatives and host of other scandals, the House Oversight Committee continues to press on with their investigation of Fast and Furious. Their attention at the moment seems to be focused on US Attorney General Eric Holder.
The House committee had subpoenaed numerous documents pertaining to the botched ATF sting operation that allowed hundreds of assault-style weapons to go into the hands of Mexican drug cartels. Those guns have since been used to murder over 300 Mexican citizens and US Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.
Last year, Holder refused to release many of the documents that the committee demanded. His refusal led to the House finding him in contempt, but no punishment was ever divvied out to the nation’s top cop for violating a congressional subpoena. Had it been you are me, our butts would have been in jail in a heartbeat.
Then Holder’s puppet master, President Obama stepped in and used his executive privilege to protect Holder and what could be very damning evidence contained in the documents. The House Oversight Committee then took their case to the courts, demanding that Holder comply with the congressional subpoena and hand over the documents. That was over a year ago.
Five months ago, both sides argued their cases before US District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson. Then the Justice Department attorneys riled for the case to be dismissed, like they do in every case that involved the DOJ or Obama.
On Monday, Judge Jackson refused the request for dismissal and said the case would continue. In her ruling against the dismissal, she wrote:
“This case presents the sort of question that the courts are traditionally called upon to resolve. Dismissing the case without hearing it would in effect place the court’s finger on the scale, designating the executive as the victor based solely on his untested assertion that the privilege applies.”
“The Court rejects the notion that merely hearing this dispute between the branches would undermine the foundation of our government, or that it would lead to the abandonment of all negotiation and accommodation in the future, leaving the courts deluged with subpoena enforcement actions.”
I was surprised to see Judge Jackson’s ruling not to dismiss the case since she was appointed to the bench by Obama. It seems she may have used the precedent set by US District Court John Bates in a 2008 case that involved President George W. Bush. The house Judiciary Committee had sought documents pertaining to Bush’s dismissal of a number of US attorneys in 2006. Even though Judge Bates was a Bush appointee, he also refused the White House request for a dismissal, forcing the case to be heard.
In her ruling, Jackson wrote:
“One cannot help but observe that in the five years that have elapsed since [Bates’s] decision, the dire consequences prophesied by the Department have not come to pass.”
“The Court cautions that this opinion should not be taken as any indication of its views on the merits of the dispute, which have yet to be briefed, argued, or considered in any way.”
In Bush case with Judge Bates, no decision was ever reached because Bush left the White House in Jan. 2009 before one could be rendered. Hopefully, it won’t take Judge Jackson that long to hear and decide the case. In the meantime, the House Oversight Committee will continue to investigate the Fast and Furious scandal. There is already strong evidence that Holder was fully aware of what was going on long before the scandal broke and even before the death of Terry. The evidence also shows that he has repeatedly lied to Congress about his knowledge and involvement in Fast and Furious and that alone should be grounds to try him for perjury and remove him from the Attorney General’s position. But once again, our Congress is too spineless to do what’s right for America.Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.
Become an insider!
Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.
SWAT Team Raids Texas Bar, Makes Arrests After Owner Defied Government Orders
Ector County Sheriff Mike Griffis said during a news conference that the owner of Big Daddy Zane’s opened her business even though Gov. Abbott explicitly mandated that bars remain closed.
Ector County Sheriff’s SWAT team raiding a peaceful protest at Big Daddy Zane’s in West Odessa. The bar opened this afternoon despite Abbott’s latest orders, saying “all businesses are essential.”
— JuYeon Kim (@JuYeonKimTV) May 5, 2020
When police arrived they found six men in body armor and armed with rifles standing outside the establishment.
“This was not a protest of their second amendment rights. It was a show of force to ensure this lady could violate the governor’s order,” Griffis told reporters.
The owner along with the seven armed men were arrested.
County Sheriffs are elected officials, whose duty is to protect the CITIZENS who elected them;NOT to be lackeys to an overreaching government. If we can’t trust our current local Sheriffs to stand for US, we need to clean house &elect better ones.
— Arizonageri (@arizonageri) May 5, 2020
And this is how quickly it can be implemented. Scarey AF ?
— ?#Trump2020 ?? (@kelleyh1961) May 5, 2020
@TheJusticeDept found some of those abuses of power and violations of civil rights you were looking for.
— Dan (@LawoftheGator) May 5, 2020
When I was in Iraq, we were lucky to have 1 MRAP with us while on patrol. Most of us in regular Humvee’s. Why on God’s green earth does a sheriff department have an MRAP??? Did I miss the part where the sheriff dept. was plagued by IED’s on American streets?
— Wolf_In_Waiting (@Sheepdog_89) May 5, 2020
The Constitution prohibits military operating against its own citizenry.
militarization of the police force began after LA bank robbery incident gone bad.
S.W.A.T was never intended to be used against unarmed citizens.
This unit should be forcibly dismantled by the DOJ.
— ? Shawn Taylor (@staylormusic) May 5, 2020
Texas AG Paxton called for the release of a jailed hair salon owner who reopened her shop despite state orders, and issued a blistering rebuke of a judge’s apparent political “stunt.”
“The trial judge did not need to lock up Shelley Luther,” Paxton wrote, according to NBC DFW. “His order is a shameful abuse of judicial discretion, which seems like another political stunt in Dallas.”
President Trump Signs Anti-Robocall Legislation Into Law
Now, what am I going to do about my expired automobile warranty?
The White House announced on Monday that President Donald Trump had signed S. 151, the Pallone-Thune TRACED Act, which will prevent criminal robocalls.
Yesterday, the President signed the TRACED Act in to law, legislation advanced by @ProbSolveCaucus. This is a major step forward to relieve Americans from the nuisance of spam robocalls, and will enhance law enforcement efforts to crack down on violators. https://t.co/qgIqaNSQhx
— Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (@RepBrianFitz) December 31, 2019
The White House:
This historic legislation will provide American consumers with even greater protection against annoying unsolicited robocalls. American families deserve control over their communications, and this legislation will update our laws and regulations to stiffen penalties, increase transparency, and enhance government collaboration to stop unwanted solicitation. President Donald J. Trump is proud to have worked with Congress to get this bipartisan legislation to his desk, and even prouder to sign it into law today.
The FTC explained: “A robocall trying to sell you something is illegal unless a company has your written permission to call you that way. To get your permission, the company has to be clear it’s asking to call you with robocalls, and it can’t make you agree to the calls to get a product or service. If you give permission, you have the right to change your mind later.”
Senator John Thune:
I have yet to meet someone who says they enjoy receiving those unwanted and illegal robocalls that plague our phones, whether we’re at home, at work, or in the car, which is why the TRACED Act takes several important steps in the fight to curb this scourge. This bill represents a unique legislative effort that is not only bipartisan at its core, but it’s nearly unanimously supported in Congress. Most importantly, this is a significant win for consumers in every corner of the country, and it finally and officially puts illegal robocallers on notice. While no process is perfect, I’m glad we were able to work together with Republicans and Democrats, senators and members of the House to reach this important compromise, which, once signed into law, will begin to make an important down payment on the fight against illegal robocalls.”
Muslim Woman Awarded $120,000 After Police Removed Her Hijab For Mugshot
A Muslim woman in Minnesota who was allegedly forced to remove her hijab for mugshot gets a $120,000 settlement.
In 2013, Aida Shyef Al-Kadi turned herself in after a warrant was issued for her arrest because of a missed court hearing over a traffic ticket. She described her treatment in custody as “one of the most humiliating and harmful experiences” of her life.
Absolutely absurd. https://t.co/k3Ckc5msy2
— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) December 24, 2019
A court awarded a Muslim woman a $120,000 settlement after police forced her to remove her hijab in front of male jailers for a mugshot in 2013.
Aida Shyef Al Kadi, who was born in Ohio and moved to Minnesota so her child could receive special medical care, was arrested after a judge issued a warrant for Al Kadi because she failed to appear in court for a traffic violation. After turning herself in, Al Kadi was ordered to remove her hijab and abaya, a dress that covers the body, in front of male jailers at the Ramsey County jail.
U.S. District Court Judge John Tunheim awarded the settlement last week after Al Kadi sued Ramsey County for violating her constitutional rights and appeared with lawyers at the Minnesota headquarters of the Council on American-Islamic Relations earlier this month.
“It was one of the most humiliating and harmful experiences of my life,” said Al Kadi. “I knew that I did not want any other Muslim woman to experience what I did.”
Al Kadi initially refused to remove her hijab and was allowed to take the religious clothing off in a separate cell in front of a single male jailer. She agreed to remove the clothing after receiving assurances that the photos would not appear online. More
Twitter chimes in:
— All American ??⭐️?? (@Redtowel4) December 24, 2019
Mug shots are used to identify people for the record, there are no exceptions. We can have a debate about public release without conviction, but there should be no special treatment.
— Smells Like Teen Statism??❄️☧ (@AgentEightSix) December 24, 2019
Islam/Sharia is incompatible with Western culture and the US Constitution.
We all get mug shots the same way. If they don’t like it, too bad.
— AtomicMountain (@AtomicMountain) December 24, 2019
So no separation of church & state when muslims are involved ? Can satanists keep hood & cowl on ? If i decide my religion requires i wear a mask in public will it be honored ? Thought Lady Justice was blind ? Guess not
— Hera Johnson (@johnson_hera) December 24, 2019
Why are these people afforded privileges no other groupis given?
— AUGal (@tina_pynes) December 24, 2019
This needs to stop….we get patted down at the Airport she can remove her headscraf
— Itismetammyb (@itismetammyb) December 24, 2019
I had to take my sunglasses off at the bank. Can I sue?
— Kate ?Trump 2020! ???? (@IrishTexan2009) December 24, 2019
Virginia Democrats File Proposals To Begin “Confiscation” Of Lawfully Owned Firearms
Virginia Democrats are filing proposals to confiscate legally-owned firearms according to a second amendment reporter.
Virginia Democrats now have a majority in the state legislature and Governor Northam has committed to passing gun control measures.
Virginia Democrats Filing Proposals To Begin ‘Confiscation’ Of Lawfully Owned Firearms, Second Amendment Reporter Says https://t.co/zWlwzUnilA
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) December 3, 2019
After taking complete control of the state, Virginia Democrats are beginning to enact their left-wing agenda to undermine Americans’ constitutionally protected Second Amendment rights.
The legislative action comes after leftist Virginia Democrat Governor Ralph Northam announced at the beginning of last month that Democrats “will at least start” their attempts to restrict Virginian’s constitutional rights by “banning the sale of [semi-automatic firearms] and high-capacity magazines, restoring the law that limits purchases to one gun a month, and a red flag law that would empower a court to temporarily remove a gun from a person deemed to be a risk to himself or others,” The Washington Post reported.
When Northam was asked about confiscating firearms from law-abiding citizens, the governor responded, “that’s something I’m working [on] with our secretary of public safety.”
Free Beacon Second Amendment reporter Stephen Gutowski noted the proposed legislation on Monday, tweeting: “Meanwhile Virginia Democrats are filing bills to make the possession of millions of currently-owned firearms illegal. SB16 bans possession of many rifles without any grandfathering provision which means it’s confiscation.”
Meanwhile Virginia Democrats are filing bills to make the possession of millions of currently-owned firearms illegal. SB16 bans possession of many rifles without any grandfathering provision which means it’s confiscation. https://t.co/i0SnJNDTxm https://t.co/j6DaJAj7g2
— Stephen Gutowski (@StephenGutowski) December 2, 2019
Virginia’s elected officials swore to uphold the constitution, now that they broke that oath the people of Virginia should impeach each and every one of them.
Then the feds need to arrest them, prosecute them and convict them for civil rights violations. Let them do time in federal prison. That’s the only way this will stop.
Remember when they said common sense gun control doesn’t mean we will take your guns away…… it’s crystal clear now their intent, the only question remains will law abiding citizens stand by as their constitutional rights are stripped away. https://t.co/nhBMRfLemZ
— Melanie (@mefbama) December 3, 2019
Illinois Set to Revolutionize War on Drugs with Common Sense Marijuana Legislation
It seems as though Illinois is finally learning the lessons of prohibition, nearly a century removed from the violence and corruption instigated by gangsters such as Al Capone.
Americans have dealt with prohibition before, most famously during the first few decades of the 20th century, in relation to the “scourge” of alcohol on this nation.
Then, we had the temperance movement, whose hard-line, teetotaling ethos bludgeoned the “land of the free” into outlawing booze. Much like the restrictive gun laws we see in liberal locales today, this prohibiting of firearms has only accomplished one thing: Putting law-abiding citizens at a disadvantage.
Soon, gangsters, rumrunners, and thugs were running amok, selling booze made either dangerously and illegally, or imported secretly from Canada. The attempted enforcement of prohibition turned into a bloodbath, and soon, the nation rescinded their virtue-signaling attempt to ban alcohol.
American marijuana laws in the 21st century are slowly catching up to those lessons of nearly a century ago, with Illinois, of all places, working to lead the way.
When lawmakers crafted the law legalizing marijuana in Illinois, they tried to make sure it would right what many see as past wrongs linked to the drug.
In addition to expunging hundreds of thousands of criminal records for marijuana arrests and convictions, the law’s architects added provisions meant to benefit communities that have been the most adversely affected by law enforcement’s efforts to combat the drug.
The so-called social equity provisions are expected to help black applicants, in particular, as blacks are nearly four times as likely as whites to be arrested for marijuana, the American Civil Liberties Union found. The law, which takes effect Jan. 1, also established ways for qualified applicants to pay lower licensing fees and get business loans and technical assistance. And it earmarked part of marijuana sales revenue for neighborhood development grants.
“On the surface, its tone and what it’s trying to do is ahead of any state that’s done this. They’re really setting off in the right way,” said Kayvan Khalatbari, a board member of Minority Cannabis Business Association, which has composed model laws outlining social equity programs. He added that follow-through will be key: “We can’t just set this in motion and set it free.”
Companies that apply for a license to sell marijuana will be judged on a 250-point scale, and those that qualify as social equity applicants will get a 50-point bump.
Not only will these laws take a great deal of power and money out of the hands of Illinois’ violent black market, but they will also spur on an entrepreneurial boom in the midwestern rust belt.
Well over half of the states in the nation currently allow for some form of legal or decriminalized use of cannabis.
Democrats Furious: President Trump to Receive Justice Award from Black Justice Group
Liberals are furious that President Donald Trump is about to be awarded the “Bipartisan Justice Award” by a prestigious black justice group.
Liberals are furious that President Donald Trump is about to be awarded the “Bipartisan Justice Award” by a prestigious black justice group for his work on criminal justice reform.
Trump will receive the award at the 2019 Second Step Presidential Justice Forum being held at Benedict College in Columbia, South Carolina, by the 20/20 Bipartisan Justice Center, a group founded by twenty black Republicans and twenty black Democrats back in 2015, according to the Daily Caller.
The annual dinner recognizes a public servant who has reached across the aisle to work on matters of criminal justice.
The White House released a celebratory press release about the award, saying:
The Bipartisan Justice Award is the highest honor given annually to a public servant who has demonstrated the ability to work across the aisle to achieve meaningful progress in reforming our criminal justice system. The 2019 Bipartisan Justice award winner is President Donald J. Trump for his Bipartisan leadership in the passage of the historic First Step Act. The award is being given by the 20/20 Bipartisan Justice Center, a non-profit organization founded by 20 Black Republicans and 20 Black Democrats in 2015, to elevate the issue of criminal justice reform above partisan politics.
Even more galling for liberals, many of the Democrat candidates for president will be in attendance at the event and will have to sit squirming in their chairs as Trump gets his award.
On Friday, Pres Trump makes first visit to a historically black college when he addresses the "Second Step" forum on criminal justice reform at Benedict College in Columbia, SC. He speaks on Friday. The Democratic presidential candidates invited over the weekend.
— Mark Knoller (@markknoller) October 25, 2019
According to the Daily Caller:
The following Democrats are set to attend the forum: Maryland Rep. John Delaney, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg, California Sen. Kamala Harris, Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, former Vice President Joe Biden, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, former HUD Secretary Julian Castro, and Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as well as Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Beto O’Rourke is also reportedly scheduled to attend.
Previous honorees include, Democratic New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, Republican Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, and Republican West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito.
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @WTHuston.
Gen. Flynn Attorney Files Surprise Request for Content of Joseph Mifsud Devices
The attorney for General Michael Flynn dropped a bombshell with a request to learn the contents of electronic devices owned by Joseph Mifsud.
The attorney for General Michael Flynn dropped a bombshell with a request to learn the contents of electronic devices owned by Joseph Mifsud, a mysterious figure at the heart of the government’s case against the general and other members of the Trump administration the government has been targeting.
Mifsud is someone the media has been utterly ignoring, and attorney Sidney Powell’s filing to compel the release of the information on the man’s devices comes as a shock because few even knew that the Department of Justice even possessed any of Mifsud’s devices.
Powell’s filing revealed that the DOJ had somehow come into possession of two of Mifsud’s electronic devices. [See filing here]
The filing introduced on Wednesday demands access to the information on the devices: “The information is material, exculpatory, and relevant to the defense of Mr. Flynn, and specifically to the ‘OCONUS LURES’ and agents that western intelligence tasked against him likely as early as 2014 to arrange — unbeknownst to him ‘connections’ with certain Russians that they would then use against him n their false claims.”
This information may hold information proving that “western intelligence” agencies hired Mifsud to illicitly target the Trump campaign.
But until now, the public was not aware that the DOJ even had these devices. We still don’t know where these devices came from. We have some information that one was manufactured in 2011 and the other in 2014.
Furthermore, the media (and the government) has been claiming that this Mifsud character is a “Russian intelligence agent.” But, doesn’t the fact that the DOJ has these devices mean that claim may be in doubt?
U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr flew to Italy to review a taped deposition of Joseph Mifsud in September. This all indicates that Mifsud is far more integral to all this than we were previously told.
The DOJ responded to Powell’s filing, saying if there is anything “relevant to sentencing” on the devices, they would provide it to the general’s defense team.
Mifsud is already known to have lied to the FBI about his actions in this case. Rep. Jim Jordan (R, OH) has already highlighted this fact:
Why didn't Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud for lying to the FBI? pic.twitter.com/34E6TSigcM
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) July 24, 2019
Rep. Devin Nunes (R, CA) has also claimed that the FBI “has something to hide” about its interactions with Mifsud.
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.
Trump hits 53% Approval and His Path to Winning 2020 is Clear
The Rasumssen Daily tracking poll has President Donald Trump's approval rating at 53 percent, meaning he has a clear path...
University Suspends Professor Who Said She Hopes Trump Voters Die of Coronavirus
A Marshall University professor has been suspended for saying in a video rant that she hopes Trump's voters die of...
WATCH: Group of Black Men Slam Black Lives Matter As Anti-Americanism At It’s Worst
A video of a group of black men slamming Black Lives Matter is gong viral and for good reason. These...
House Republicans Introduce Bill To Defund Schools Teaching Fake 1619 Project Agenda
With the steady advance of the anti-American 1619 Project though our schools, House of Republicans have introduced a bill to...
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dead at 87 — Trump MUST Fill This Seat
With the death of left-wing U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Trump now has his best change to chance...
Become an insider
Best of the Month
Black Lives Matter3 weeks ago
Coroner Saying George Floyd Died of Drug Overdose, Not Police Brutality
Republicans3 weeks ago
Republican Convention TV Ratings Grew for First and Second Nights
Black Lives Matter3 weeks ago
Black Lives Matter Leader Threatens to Post Personal Info of Random Cops Until City Reveals Jacob Blake Shooter
Antifa3 weeks ago
Seattle Antifa Members Arrested in Kenosha with Cans of Gas in Van
Democrats4 weeks ago
Democrats Invited Unrepentant Convicted Rapist, Torturer, and Killer Speak at Convention, Media Silent
Business2 weeks ago
DeAnna Lorraine: Stop Supporting Companies That Hate You, Here Are Some Alternatives
Coronavirus3 weeks ago
CDC Quietly Admits That Less than 10,000 Really Died from COVID-19
Democrats4 weeks ago
5 Most Egregious Lies of Joe Biden’s Career EXPOSED
Democrats4 weeks ago
Democrats Starting Civil War: Speaker Nancy Pelosi Calls Republicans and Trump ‘Enemies of the State’
Voter Fraud2 weeks ago
ICE: 19 Foreign Nationals Charged With Voter Fraud In North Carolina
Black Lives Matter3 weeks ago
Joe Biden Will Kneel At Debate With Trump To Show Solidarity With BLM, Sources Claim
Crime4 weeks ago
Democrat Candidate for Mayor Arrested after Staging Kidnapping and Beating to Gain Sympathy Votes