Connect with us

Courts

Hunter Biden’s Baby Mama Demanding To Know How Much He Was Paid By Burisma, Chinese-Connected Firm

Published

on

Hunter Biden’s baby mama Lunden Roberts has demanded he admit that he was employed by the Burisma, how much money he was paid by the Ukrainian company and that he also received money from a Chinese person or entity.

She also demands that he admit how much he was compensated on a monthly basis in new court documents obtained the Dailymail.com

Daily Mail:

Lunden Roberts, the mother of Hunter Biden’s baby, has demanded that he admit he was employed as a board member for Burisma in the Ukraine and that he was compensated on a monthly basis in new court documents obtained exclusively by Dailymail.com.

Trending: Sekulow Destroys Schiff As Impeachment Trial Starts

The amount of money that Roberts asks Biden confirm is redacted in the seven-page document filed today, but it has been widely reported that the vice president’s son was earning $83,000 a month for his role at the Ukrainian energy company.

Roberts has also asked that Biden admit that he ‘or an entity owned, controlled or under your direction or supervision’ received money from a Chinese person or entity for foreign and domestic investment purposes.

The document contains 47 requests for admission by Biden, most of which are redacted in some way, including six related to his income taxes for the years from 2013 to 2018.

In other documents,obtained by DailyMail.com, Biden has objected to paying for his baby mama’s legal bill. More

I’m really surprised Hunter Biden didn’t just pay her off before the story broke. It just highlights his greed, stupidity and his total lack of a moral compass.

A decent person would have done it because it was the right thing to do. An immoral person with any intelligence would have done it because it was the cheapest way to deal with the problem. It takes a special kind of greedy to end up in this situation.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement

Courts

Gen. Michael Flynn Withdraws Guilty Plea After Prosecutors Grossly Breach Plea Agreement

Former Trump national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn is filing to withdraw his guilty plea in Mueller case.

Published

on

Former Trump national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn is filing to withdraw his guilty plea in Mueller case.

Flynn officially moved to withdraw his guilty plea on Tuesday evening, two years after he agreed with prosecutors that he lied to federal agents about his contacts with a Russian diplomat before the inauguration of President Donald Trump, CNBC reported.

Flynn’s move comes only a week after federal prosecutors asked federal Judge Emmet Sullivan to hand Flynn only a six-month jail sentence because of the “serious nature of” of the “offense,” and “his apparent failure to accept responsibility” for his violations.

“Michael T. Flynn is innocent,” his attorney, Sidney Powell, wrote in her Tuesday filing.

Powell went on to slam the government:

Powell wrote that Flynn is withdrawing his plea “because of the government’s bad faith, vindictiveness, and breach of the plea agreement.” She also asked Judge Emmet Sullivan for a 30-day delay of Flynn’s sentencing date, which is currently scheduled for Jan. 28.

Sullivan has yet to sign off on Flynn’s plea withdrawal. The judge could possibly reject Flynn’s motion, letting the guilty plea stand.

Powell posted her 22-page filing on Twitter for all to see.

Government prosecutors have slammed Flynn for his shift toward withdrawing his guilty plea.

CNBC added:

Flynn was charged as part of then-special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian election interference during the 2016 presidential election. He had nearly been sentenced in December 2018, but opted to postpone that proceeding after Sullivan harshly urged him to first complete his cooperation with Mueller’s probe.

But Flynn’s attorney has hammered the government for its criminal actions against the general.

Flynn realized he was badly served by his former legal counsel and fired them. His new lawyer, D.C. power lawyer Sidney Powell, uncovered a ton of malfeasance by the FBI and federal prosecutors and filed a flurry of motions to try and force the judge to see the facts before his very face.

In August, Powell filed a motion asking the court to hold prosecutors in contempt for withholding evidence, and also alleged a long list of improprieties.

As the Daily Caller noted:

Flynn’s legal team has accused federal prosecutors of “egregious government misconduct” in the case and has sought evidence regarding internal FBI discussions about the decision to interview the retired lieutenant general about the Russian ambassador. Among the documents sought were text messages involving Peter Strzok, the disgraced former FBI counterintelligence official who took part in the Flynn interview.

“Strzok was fired from the FBI on Aug. 10, 2018 over anti-Trump text messages he exchanged with FBI lawyer Lisa Page,” the site added.

Infuriatingly, the judge has now simply ignored the proof of misconduct by federal prosecutors.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Courts

CNN Settles $275 Million Lawsuit for Defaming Covington Catholic Teenager Nick Sandman

CNN has settled in the $275 million defamation lawsuit brought against it by Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandman.

Published

on

Left-wing cable “news” outlet, CNN, has admitted to a settlement in the $275 million defamation lawsuit brought against it by Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandman.

On Tuesday afternoon, a CNN spokesman confirmed to the Cincinnati Enquirer that the settlement had been reached.

The network did not reveal the dollar amount of the settlement and Mr. Sandman’s representatives have also not made any statements on the topic.

Sandman’s legal team is still pursuing similar lawsuits against the Washington Post, and NBC Universal for their fake news coverage of the incident that shot the teenager into TVs and newspapers all across the country last year.

Sandman and his highs school classmates were widely accused of “mocking” Native American activist Nathan Phillips while wearing a red Donald Trump “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) baseball hats during the March for Life event last January in Washington D.C.

The media nearly universally accused the teenagers led by young Mr. Sandman of taunting the Native American activists. But the teens were also accused of menacingly blocking the Native Americans and not letting them leave the area as the teens threatened them with violence.

The media portrayed Phillips and his radical left-wing activists of being threatened, intimidated and attacked by the teens. But in the days after the incident was first reported, more complete video of the incident came to light proving that the teens were simply minding their own business when Phillips and his crew went out of their way to confront the teens. Not only that, but the teens obviously did not block Phillips from coming or going as he pleased.

Furthermore, the whole incident was kicked off when a group of radical black leftists began verbally assaulting the teens in vulgar terms, and with a loud clamor that caught the attention of Phillips and his extremists.

In the end, it became clear that it was the teens who were the victims of harassment and intimidation, not the teens that perpetrated the same.

The media got the story 100 percent backwards, and in the process smeared the teenagers as hateful, white supremacists.

Sandman’s legal team noted that they are looking to sue Gannett news agency, as well.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Courts

Armed Bank Robber Commits Fourth Robbery After Being Released Due to New York Bail Reform

A man who police say has now committed four armed bank robberies was released without bail due to New York’s lenient new bail reform rules.

Published

on

A man who police say has now committed four armed bank robberies was released without bail due to New York’s lenient new bail reform rules.

Police in New York reported that bank robber Christopher Seamans was arrested on Tuesday for robbing yet another bank but was then released without bail due to the reform laws.

The police say that the 41-year-old suspect robbed the Pioneer Bank in Albany on Friday and got away with an undisclosed amount of cash, the Times Union reported.

Video of the crime shows Seamans demanding cash at a teller’s window. He did not show a weapon, but kept his hand menacingly inside his jacket during the robbery.

No one was hurt during the robbery, but Seamans reportedly threatened harm.

Seamans has been accused of three previous bank robberies.

He was sentenced in 2005 to four years in prison for crimes in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. He was also sentenced to more than four years for robbing a New York bank in 2010.

Seamans was released from federal prison Dec. 17, 2017.

But despite being arrested for a fourth bank robbery, Seamans was immediately released due to the state’s new liberal bail reform law.

Seamans was released on his own recognizance after going before a judge on Friday.

So, now New York is releasing armed bank robbers due to this “reform” law.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Courts

Judge orders Alex Jones to Pay $100,000 in Sandy Hook Defamation Case

A Texas judge has ordered Internet bomb thrower Alex Jones to pay $100,000 claiming that the 2012 Sandy Hook school attack was a hoax.

Published

on

A Texas judge has ordered Internet bomb thrower Alex Jones to pay $100,000 for using his Internet platform to claim that the 2012 Sandy Hook school attack was a hoax.

Jone was sued in an Austin, Texas, court for defamation by the parents of a 6-year-old child who was among the 26 people killed in December of 2012 by a gunman who entered the school in Newtown, Connecticut.

For for several years after the attack, Jones called the shooting a “false flag” and insisted that it was a staged hoax.

According to the Associated Press:

State District Judge Scott Jenkins ruled on Dec. 20 that Jones and his defense team “intentionally disregarded” an earlier order to provide witnesses to attorneys representing a Sandy Hook father who brought the lawsuit, Neil Heslin. Jenkins also denied Jones’ request to dismiss the lawsuit.

Jones runs his Infowars empire out of a Texas studio and has had great influence on the Internet on sites such as Youtube.

He is often accused of pushing extreme right-wing conspiracy theories.

Still, he eventually reversed his position that the shooting at Sandy Hook is a hoax and formally apologized for his years of comments about the incident.

He claimed that he succumbed to a “psychosis” which made him think the shooting was staged.

“And I, myself, have almost had like a form of psychosis back in the past where I basically thought everything was staged, even though I’ve now learned a lot of times things aren’t staged,” he said in April. “So I think as a pundit, someone giving an opinion, that, you know, my opinions have been wrong, but they were never wrong consciously to hurt people.”

Some of the family members of the victims have reported receiving harassment and even death threats by people who believed Jones’ claims that Sandy Hook was a hoax.

Jones still faces lawsuits from several others, as well.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Courts

Trump’s New Judges Shows He’s Broken the Liberal’s Lock on the Federal Bench

MSN News had a startling headline, Sunday, that blared “1 in every 4 circuit court judges is now a Trump appointee.” This is an astonishing achievement.

Published

on

MSN News had a startling headline, Sunday, that blared “1 in every 4 circuit court judges is now a Trump appointee.” This is an astonishing achievement made even more amazing by the relative youthful ages of Trump’s nominees, meaning they will be influencing our jurisprudence for many, many decades to come.

And Trump isn’t even done, yet!

Folks, this incredible success on the federal bench is THE main reason we need to vote for President Donald Trump again in 2020. His revamping of the federal judiciary is extremely important and a huge mark in our favor.

After only three years in office, Trump’s strides in remaking the federal judiciary in a more conservative direction really is staggering.

Last week, the U.S. Senate confirmed Trump’s 187th judge to the bench.

So far, Trump has sat this many judges:

-135 District Court judges
-50 Circuit Court judges
-2 Supreme Court justices

It has been a good year for judicial confirmations. 20% of the District judges are now Trump nominees and over 20% of the Circuit judges. The 2nd, 3rd and 11th Circuits have flipped to Republican-appointed majorities for the first time in living memory. And the once extremely left-wing 9th Circuit Court in California now has a 16-13 Democrat majority instead of the 23-6 Democrat majority when Trump took office.

Trump’s had 50 Circuit judges confirmed in less than THREE years. By comparison Obama only had 55 in EIGHT years.

Both W. Bush and Obama had 325 Federal judges confirmed in eight years. Trump has over half that number in less than three years.

And if we send Donald Trump to office for a second term, this will only continue. The revamping of the courts will cast the far left into the wilderness for many decades to come if it is allowed to continue for a second Trump term. This is extremely important to hold off the tide of the destructive, anti-American leftism that has gotten a stranglehold on both popular culture and the Democrat Party.

This is not all due to Trump, granted. A lot of the thanks for this monumental task goes to U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell who has made confirming judges one of his highest priorities in this presidency.

McConnell did this by limiting debate on judicial nominees to only 30 hours and by putting an end to the “blue slip” procedure that essentially allowed U.S. Senators to pick their own appointees for the districts in their state instead of allowing the president to do it.

Trump still has a long way to go to totally eliminate the left’s lock on our federal courts, but he has made more significant headway than any Republican president in history.

This is why we need him elected to a second term. This single thing is more important than any other thing Trump could do in office.

Finally, THIS thing is exactly why never Trumpers are traitors to the U.S.A. By working to destroy Trump they are making sure the judiciary remains captive to the far, far, un-American, dangerous left-wing.

If you know someone who claims to be a conservative, but who is working to destroy Trump, you can know for a fact that they are not a conservative at all. Because in this day and age, returning sanity to the federal bench is above all things the most important thing we can do right now. And no other Republican president will do it.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Courts

Judge Ignores Misconduct in Michael Flynn Case, Sets Sentencing for Jan. 28

A federal Judge has ignored the mountain of evidence of prosecutorial misconduct in Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s court case and set a date for sentencing.

Published

on

Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan has ignored the mountain of evidence of prosecutorial misconduct and FBI malfeasance in Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s court case and set the date of January 28 for sentencing.

Judge Sullivan ruled on Monday and ignored the evidence that the FBI and federal prosecutors repeatedly lied during both the investigation into the one-time Trump National Security Adviser as well as during the trial.

“The sworn statements of Mr. Flynn and his former counsel belie his new claims of innocence and his new assertions that he was pressured into pleading guilty to making materially false statements to the FBI,” wrote the left-wing, Clinton appointed judge.

“And it is undisputed that Mr. Flynn not only made those false statements to the FBI agents, but he also made the same false statements to the Vice President and senior White House officials, who, in turn, repeated Mr. Flynn’s false statements to the American people on national television,” the biased judge added.

On Dec. 1, 2017, Gen. Flynn pleaded guilty to making false statements during a Jan. 24, 2017 interview with FBI agents regarding his contacts with former Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

But Flynn realized he was badly served by his former legal counsel and fired them. His new lawyer, D.C. power lawyer Sidney Powell, uncovered a ton of malfeasance by the FBI and federal prosecutors and filed a flurry of motions to try and force the judge to see the facts before his very face.

In August, Powell filed a motion asking the court to hold prosecutors in contempt for withholding evidence, and also alleged a long list of improprieties.

As the Daily Caller noted:

Flynn’s legal team has accused federal prosecutors of “egregious government misconduct” in the case and has sought evidence regarding internal FBI discussions about the decision to interview the retired lieutenant general about the Russian ambassador. Among the documents sought were text messages involving Peter Strzok, the disgraced former FBI counterintelligence official who took part in the Flynn interview.

“Strzok was fired from the FBI on Aug. 10, 2018 over anti-Trump text messages he exchanged with FBI lawyer Lisa Page,” the site added.

Infuriatingly, the judge has now simply ignored the proof of misconduct by federal prosecutors.

Powell will surely appeal the case.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Courts

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Slams the FBI for FISA Corruption

One part of the FBI’s crimes against Trump that is going ignored by the media is the FSIA court’s rebuke of the FBI for its misconduct.

Published

on

One part of the FBI’s crimes against Trump that is going ignored by the media is the FSIA court’s rebuke of the FBI for its misconduct issued this week.

For those a bit hazy on the topic, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court is a secret court set up by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. This court does not have open proceedings and all its rulings are secret and unavailable to the public.

The purpose of this court is to give our intelligence services a place to get a legal blanket for the surveillance of terror suspects or suspects who may be involved in espionage of some sort.

The basic idea is that the FBI and other intelligence agencies can go to this court and get approval by a judge to carry out their surveillance. These judges are supposed to take the FBI’s evidence and then apply the law to the requests for surveillance to see if the request would be permissible under the law.

But what we now know is that the FBI lied to the FISA court about the “evidence” it had that led to the FISA court’s OK to spy on the Trump campaign.

We all learned this from the Department of Justice Inspector General report that came out last week.

This week, the FISA court took an unusual, public measure to censure the FBI and demand it make changes to its process.

On Tuesday, the court issued a letter entitled, “Accuracy concerns regarding FBI matters submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.”

The FISA court gave the FBI until January 10 to explain how it will fix the errors committed in requests to spy on Trump.

At one point, the letter makes the frank accusation that “When FBI personnel mislead NSD in the ways described above, they equally mislead the FISC.”

Presiding judge Rosemary Collyer added: “The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable.”

This is a stunning pubic accusation the likes of which has never been seen.

The fact is that Obama’s corrupt FBI purposefully lied to the FISA court in a political effort to destroy Donald Trump.

Here is what the FBI did:

-The Clinton campaign paid for the fake Steele Dossier that fabricated all sorts of accusations of misconduct against Trump
-The FBI and Clinton campaign leaked the dossier to the press
-The press reported on the fake info
-The FBI then used the media reports to “prove” that Trump needed to be spied on
-The FBI never told the court that the dossier was fake, that they KNEW the dossier was fake, and that they knew who wrote it
-The FISA court unknowingly used the purposefully limited info to OK the spying thinking that the FBI had told them all they knew at the time

This is the crooked process Obama’s FBI pushed over on the FISA court.And this is why the court just rebuked the Bureau.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider


Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend