Connect with us


Here’s How Trump’s Actions Have Helped People With Pre-Existing Conditions & Major Health Issues



Until Obamacare is banished and gone forever I don’t want to see anymore campaigning on healthcare. I want it gone. Period.

It was rammed down our throats in the dead of night and could be removed just as easily. Please share this information with anyone arguing GOP are bad on pre-existing conditions.

If Republicans hold the House and Senate I believe Obamacare will be completely gone…

NY Post:

Trending: Democrat Adam Schiff Tied to Companies Accused in Ukraine Corruption

Democrats have tried to make Tuesday’s elections about health care. As with most issues, they equate government spending with success — liberals claim they care more than conservatives because they spend more of other people’s hard-earned money.

Full disclosure: My husband, Russ Vought, is deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget. But speaking strictly as the mother of a child with a life-threatening genetic disease, I know that other policy changes can make a critical impact on the lives of sick patients without government spending.

And so does the Trump administration, which has taken several vital steps to reorient the federal bureaucracy toward the chronically ill and individuals with pre-existing conditions.

First, the administration has made expanded access to prescription drugs a top priority. In the fiscal year that ended on Sept. 30, the Food and Drug Administration OK’d 971 generic drugs — a record, breaking the old mark of 937 approvals set just last year. Compare that to the 651 green-lighted in 2016 and the 492 the year before under President Barack Obama.

The more rapid approval of generic drugs has had an impact on patients’ wallets — and lives. A recent Council of Economic Advisers report found that the slowdown in prescription drug price growth over the past two years saved consumers $26 billion through July.

When it comes to brand-name drugs, Team Trump has worked hard to bring new and potentially innovative treatments to the sickest of patients. Toward that end, President Trump signed the “right-to-try” law in May, allowing terminally ill patients the right to access experimental treatments that may save their life, without government bureaucrats interfering.  More

The more the government spends on a program, the more that program costs US taxpayers, the more the Democrats hail it as a success. And if it’s still failing, their only solution is to spend more of our money on it. You know a one trick pony donkey…

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.



Doctor Says High Estrogen in Burger King’s ‘Impossible Whopper’ Will ‘Grow Breasts on Men’

Fast food giant Burger King has come under fire for the incredibly high amount of estrogen inside its fake meat “Impossible Whopper” sandwich.



Fast food giant Burger King has come under fire for the incredibly high amount of estrogen inside its fake meat “Impossible Whopper” sandwich.

A veterinarian from South Dakota was shocked when he found that the sandwich contains a whopping 18 million times more estrogen in it than the average hamburger. And he also warned that only a few of the sandwiches could actually affect a man’s health.

Dr. James Stangle took aim at The King for its meatless sandwich made of soy products.

Firstly, he slammed the fast food joint for a sort of false advertising.

“The impossible whopper has 630 calories, mostly from the added oils. The whopper has 660 calories. So, about 5% less calories, this is not a huge improvement,” Stangle wrote this month in the Tri-State Livestock News.

“The impossible whopper patty is made from 24 ingredients,” Stangle continued. “The most important ingredient is soy protein. The whopper patty has just one ingredient. That would be beef.”

But the estrogen content is high. “The impossible whopper has 44 mg of estrogen and the whopper has 2.5 ng of estrogen,” Stangle said.

“Now let me refresh your metric system,” the doc continued. “There are 1 million nanograms (ng) in one milligram (mg). That means an impossible whopper has 18 million times as much estrogen as a regular whopper.”

Stangle also warned that this level of estrogen could affect the physiology of an adult male if he had only a few of these burgers in a day.

“Just six glasses of soymilk per day has enough estrogen to grow boobs on a male,” he said alarmingly. “That’s the equivalent of eating four impossible whoppers per day. You would have to eat 880 pounds of beef from an implanted steer [cattle that is raised for beef] to equal the amount of estrogen in one birth control pill.”

“In short, the Impossible Burger is a genetically modified organism filled with calorie-dense oils that can make a man grow breasts if eaten in sufficient quantity,” the doc concluded.

But not everyone was so alarmed by the doctor’s claims. Some nutritionists say that the phytoestrogens in soy products don’t really harm humans.

“Such a link has never been substantiated in human studies. I don’t think this is a concern at all,” Dr. Qi Sun, an assistant professor in the Department of Nutrition at Harvard, told Men’s Health.

New York University nutrition professor Marion Nestle agrees. She recently said that Asian people eat a lot of soy and it does not seem to harm them.

“Asians have been eating soy products for millennia and don’t seem to be any the worse for it. They have among the longest lifespans and best health, at least in classic diets,” she told the Daily Mail.

“There is a special concern about . . . men and boys who eat soy products, but again, if you look at populations that eat a lot of soy products, there is no evidence of particular problems. No, they don’t grow breasts,” she added.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Millions of Obamacare Users Will Now Get Separate Bill for Abortion Coverage, Including Men!

Thanks to a change implemented by Trump, Obamacare users will now get a separate bill telling them how much they are paying for abortion coverage



Thanks to a change implemented by the Trump administration, Obamacare users will now get a separate bill telling them how much they are paying for abortion coverage… even if they are men.

Why will men get a bill? Because Obamacare also charges men for abortion coverage. Whether they want it or not.

Indeed, that is why the Trump administration made the rules change, so that Americans will become aware of what Obamacare is doing.

Starting in June, three million Americans who now pay Obamacare insurance premiums through the Affordable Care Act (the ACA, or, as we call it, Obamacare) will receive two separate bills for their healthcare coverage.

One will be for most of their insurance plan. But a second bill will arrive detailing what they pay for abortion coverage. Yes, even if the person being covered is a male.

The ACA already told providers they are supposed to show the abortion coverage and costs on itemized bills. But in 2014 it was discovered that many were still not doing so despite the requirement.

So, the Trump administration took the step of separating the bills so that Americans would be 100 percent sure of what they are paying for with the premium payments.

The fact is, few Americans know that they are paying for abortion coverage. And that is why so many of the Obamacare providers try to hide the coverage.

Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said that providing separate bills is “an essential step” in fixing the insurance industry’s penchant for ignoring the rules on bill notices.

“The separate billing requirement fulfills Congress’ intent and reflects President Trump’s strong commitment to preventing taxpayer funding of abortion coverage,” Azar said.

The new rule will come into effect on June 27, 2020, and abortionists are already losing their minds. Naturally, they are raising fears that the rule will somehow prevent women from getting healthcare.

This is a lie, of course. A separate bill won’t do a darn thing to anyone’s coverage. But it will tell Americans that Obama and his dangerous, expensive, anti-American law is forcing them to pay for abortion coverage whether they want it or not.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


U.S. Appeals Court Strikes Down Obamacare Mandate, Setting Up Repeal

A U.S. Appeals court has struck down Obamacare’s individual mandate as unconstitutional setting up the healthcare law for a full repeal.



A U.S. Appeals court has struck down Obamacare’s individual mandate as unconstitutional setting up the healthcare law for a full repeal.

By a two-to-one vote, the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals moved to invalidate Obamacare’s individual mandate, undermining the entire basis for the law, ABC noted.

“The individual mandate is unconstitutional because it can no longer be read as a tax, and there is no other constitutional provision that justifies this exercise of congressional power,” the court said in its majority opinion.

President Trump praised the court’s ruling, calling it a “win for all Americans.”

“Today’s decision in Texas v. Azar is a win for all Americans and confirms what I have said all along: that the individual mandate, by far the worst element of Obamacare, is unconstitutional,” Trump’s statement said.

“My Administration continues to work to provide access to high-quality healthcare at a price you can afford, while strongly protecting those with pre-existing conditions,” Trump added. “Providing affordable, high-quality healthcare will always be my priority.”

Noting that “Article IV of the Constitution says the federal government cannot mandate the American people buy something,” conservative talk show giant Rush Limbaugh celebrated the decision.

“The federal government can tax you, your income, any number of things. So, when the chief justice transferred the individual mandate from a requirement that you buy insurance to the government having the power to tax, then it became constitutional. So now (chuckling) a federal appeals court has ruled that the machinations of the chief justice, essentially, are unconstitutional,” Limbaugh explained.

Indeed, Limbaugh is right. Chief Justice John Roberts summarily re-wrote the section of Obamacare so that it would pass Constitutional muster. The law itself was garbage and was garbage since day one. Unfortunately, Roberts stepped in to save an unconstitutional law by illicitly re-writing it.

That was NOT his job. Supreme Court justices are not legislators.

This law should never have been approved.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Amid Impeachment Row, White House Works to Clarify Drug Prices

The White House took these actions as the Democrats continued to hold the nation hostage through impeachment.



The Democrats have long claimed that they are able to “walk and chew gum at the same time” – an anecdote meant to assure the nation that this impeachment fiasco won’t detract from the normal business of the United States, which our public servants were elected to perform.

Unfortunately, this has been far from the truth, and the work that we sent these representatives to Washington to do is not getting done…or, at least not by them.

New rules from the Trump administration on Friday would require insurers and hospitals to disclose upfront the actual prices for common tests and procedures to promote competition and push down costs.

But the sweeping changes face stiff pushback from the health care industry and a coalition of major hospital groups quickly announced that hospitals will sue to block the changes.

Even in an ideal world where information flows freely, patients and their families would have to deal with a learning curve to become comfortable with the intricacies of health care billing.

“This shadowy system has to change,” Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar said. “The patient has to be in control.”

A final rule would apply to hospitals and a proposed regulation would apply to insurance plans. Disclosure requirements for hospitals would not take effect until 2021; for insurers, the timing is unclear. The requirements do not directly affect doctors.

And why is this so important?

Officials say the rules would shine a spotlight on the confusing maze of health care prices, allowing informed patients to find quality services at the lowest cost. Prices for an MRI scan for example can vary by hundreds of dollars depending on where it’s done.

Healthcare has consistently ranked as one of the top concerns for Americans, particularly when it comes to the candidates for whom they vote.  Given what we know about the left’s reluctance to focus on this all-important issue in favor of impeachment, we expect that 2020’s election could be a reckoning for the Democrats.


Continue Reading


Poll: Only 10% of Americans Want Private Health Insurance Abolished–Are Democrats Listening?

a new poll finds bad news for Democrats on their plan of ending private healthcare insurance as only ten percent agree with the plan.



Just about the entire field of Democrat candidates for President want “Medicare for all” and an end to private healthcare insurance. But a new poll finds bad news for Democrats on this topic as only ten percent agree with the plan.

The new The Hill-HarrisX poll released on Friday is not good news for left-wing Democrats who think that Americans want “free” healthcare.

With the Democrat candidates all pushing one version or another of government-run healthcare, the poll does not seem to show much support for the idea at all.

According to Daily Caller:

The poll, which was conducted between September 20-21, asked 1,000 registered voters which statement about health care “comes closest” to their view.

Coming out on top with 27% was the following statement: “Medicare/Medicaid should be expanded to cover all citizens regardless of age or income, but people should be able to purchase private supplemental plans.”

Next up, 25 percent agreed that “Any citizen should be able to sign up for Medicare/Medicaid regardless of age or income while those with private plans could keep their existing insurance.”

The third highest was 19 percent who felt that the whole system should just be left alone.

Then came 18 percent who said the government shouldn’t be paying for any healthcare at all.

Then, bringing up the rear, only a tiny ten percent agreed with this statement: “Medicare/Medicaid should be expanded to cover all citizens regardless of age or income and private health plans should be abolished.”

The final result shows that fully 89 percent oppose the Democrat’s healthcare in varying degrees.

This poll is not good news for the liberals.

Are Democrats listening?

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Continue Reading


REPORT: Fake News Could Be Infecting Your Brain

Here is just one hilariously terrifying example



One of the 21st century’s most necessary and profound battles will be fought over the very concept of the truth itself.

We live in a world of “fake news”, wherein you and your neighbor could read the exact same data and come to wildly different conclusions, likely skewed by your political allegiances having been weaponized by the mainstream media.  Climate change is just one great example where two scientists, graduating from the same school, in the same year, taking the same classes with the same professors, and performing academically identical to one another could have wildly different beliefs on what exactly is happening with our environment.

Then, there are the “deep fakes”; video clips masterfully created by digital artists in order to place a person in a place they’ve never been, saying things that they’ve never said, with alarmingly convincing realism.

Here is just one hilariously terrifying example:

And while that one is simply silly, take a look at this interview with Bill Hader where, ever so subtly, the impressionist comedian transforms into both Tom Cruise and Seth Rogen while speaking:

Remember, this technological wizardry is advancing in addition to the glut of “fake news” being propagated in basements and newsrooms alike, all around this great nation.

A new report states that the danger of this technology isn’t just being tricked by our peers, or creeped out by these deep fakes.  These sort of falsehoods are leaving very real impressions within our own minds.

According to a joint study conducted by both American and Irish researchers, fake news almost certainly influences voters, and can even cause many to form false memories based on fabricated news reports they’ve seen.

After analyzing voters in the week leading up to the 2018 Irish referendum on abortion, researchers say that individuals are more likely to form false memories based off of a fake news report if it aligns with their political beliefs. Furthermore, the more a topic elicits an emotional response, the more likely a person is to form false memories that support their preconceived notions. With this in mind, the study’s authors say they expect fake and fabricated news to have a similar effect on U.S. voters in 2020.

“In highly emotional, partisan political contests, such as the 2020 US Presidential election, voters may ‘remember’ entirely fabricated news stories,” explains lead author Gillian Murphy of University College Cork in a media release. “In particular, they are likely to ‘remember’ scandals that reflect poorly on the opposing candidate.”

Just how did researchers come to this conclusion?

A total of 3,140 potential Irish voters were surveyed. Each person was asked about their voting plans heading into the abortion referendum. Then, each participant was given six news reports. Two of those news stories were completely fabricated, and consisted of political figures on both sides of the abortion debate engaging in illegal or immoral behavior. After reading each of the six news stories, participants were asked if they had heard about the depicted events before, and if so, they were requested to recall specific memories.

Next, participants were told that some of the news stories they had just read were false, and were asked to identify which reports they believed to be fake. Each study subject also completed a cognitive test.

Almost half of the participants reported a memory pertaining to at least one completely fabricated news story, and many even recalled intricate details about a fake story. Interestingly, those in favor of legalized abortion were more likely to remember a false claim about anti-abortion figures, and those against legalized abortion were more likely to recall a false memory about pro-abortion political figures.

Of course, these concerns don’t end within one’s own mind, especially in a nation such as the United States, where the mainstream media is constantly goading We The People toward conflict.

Continue Reading


Trump Rolls Back Obamacare’s Birth Control Rule… Shielding Nuns From Contraceptive Mandate



President Trump neuters ObamaCare birth control coverage mandate and tightens regulations on plans covering abortion.

The Trump administration finalized major rule changes aimed at rolling back the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage mandate and tightening restrictions to ensure that taxpayer subsidies aren’t used to fund abortions.

Obama prosecuted nuns to force his will on them, but Trump protects them. See the difference?

Washington Examiner:

The Trump administration will exempt employers from providing insurance coverage for birth control if it conflicts with their religious or moral beliefs, scaling back a rule created under the Obama administration.

The rule, released Wednesday, will take effect in 60 days and will affect between 6,400 and 127,000 women, according to the Trump administration. The religious exemption applies to any type of employer, but the moral exemption doesn’t apply to publicly traded businesses or government entities.

The rules received praise from Susan B. Anthony’s List, an anti-abortion group that holds a moral objection to certain types of birth control. The group’s president, Marjorie Dannenfelser, in a statement slammed the original rules created under the Obama administration as “repeated violations of conscience” that were “deeply contrary to the core of our nation.”

But the American Civil Liberties Union lashed out at the rule in a statement, saying it would allow “virtually any employer to claim a religious exemption that enables it to deny any employee insurance coverage for contraception.”

“This rule will make it harder for hundreds of thousands of Americans, particularly women, to get the health care coverage they need,” Louise Melling, ACLU deputy legal director, said in a statement. “This rule will be used as a license to discriminate and represents a chilling return to the days when the government treated women’s sexuality, and thus contraception, as immoral, perpetuating harmful stereotypes that have long been used to discriminate against women.”

The birth control mandate was created as an outgrowth of Obamacare. The law was written to allow the Department of Health and Human Services to decide what type of preventive care health insurance plans should cover without a co-pay, and the Obama administration determined that all forms of birth control should fall within that list. Making such decisions through the rulemaking process, however, means that different administrations can change or reverse them.

The Obama administration had issued rules saying that employers must cover all forms of contraception, from birth control pills to emergency contraception. The obligation had exemptions for houses of worship, but not for companies that had closely held religious beliefs. More than 55 million women relied on the provision, the Obama administration had said. More

The administration proposed tighter rules on ObamaCare plans that cover abortion. Those changes are intended to ensure that taxpayer-provided subsidies for health insurance are not used to pay for any abortions.

Now it’s time to completely defund Planned Parenthood.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend