Connect with us


Fox Allows Super Bowl Ad With Drag Queens, Refuse To Approve Pro-Life Commercial



Fox is stonewalling a pro-life group from running it’s ‘abortion survivors’ ad on Super Bowl Sunday.

Faces of Choice, a new non-profit whose ad featuring 14 survivors of abortion was shown at the March for Life, say they have been “given the runaround” by Fox for six months.

Life News:

FOX Sports apparently has no problem airing controversial ads during the 2020 Super Bowl — just not a pro-life commercial.

Trending: China Now Says Virulent Coronavirus Started Earlier, Hit Two Areas at Once

According to NBC News, this year’s big game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the San Francisco 49ers will include a commercial featuring drag queens/LGBTQ activists.

Meanwhile, pro-life advocates with the new Faces of Choice organization said they have been waiting at least six months for an answer from FOX about their ad.

The drag queen ad from Sabra hummus already is stirring up controversy. It features drag queens Kim Chi and Miz Cracker from “RuPaul’s Drag Race.”

LGBTQ marketing strategist Bob Witeck celebrated the significance of the ad, telling NBC:

“For queer audiences, it is an art form and an ‘outsiders’ language,” Witek said of drag. “Reaching the Super Bowl means taking our language into every home in the nation and millions around the world.”

Witeck said the Sabra ad, which could reach around 100 million viewers during the Super Bowl, is indicative of a sea change in the public perception of drag, which he said has been normalized in the mainstream for many years, thanks in large part to the success of the award-winning reality show “RuPaul’s Drag Race.”  More

In the teaser for the ad campaign, Miz Cracker clumsily attempts to put a football helmet on over her sizable wig. “I hope this doesn’t give me helmet hair,” she says, while Kim Chi looks on skeptically.
What goes with hummus? Snacks! That’s why we’ve got Miz Cracker and Kim Chi suiting up for our #SuperBowlLIV commercial on Feb 2! #HairWeGo!

They can air commercials with drag queens but not a pro-life one? What happened to Fox’s claim to be fair and balanced? Bye, Bye Fox Sports!

Here are the stories of abortion survivors:

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.



U.S. Appeals Court Hands Trump a Victory, Upholds New Abortion Rules

A U.S. appeals court upheld Trump’s rules barring taxpayer-funded family-planning clinics from referring women to abortion clinics.



On Monday, a U.S. appeals court upheld President Trump’s rules barring taxpayer-funded family-planning clinics from referring women to abortion clinics.

“The 7-4 ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned decisions issued by judges in Washington, Oregon and California. The court had already allowed the administration’s changes to start taking effect while the government appealed those rulings,” the Associated Press reported.

The Trump rule prevents clinics that take Title-X funding from referring women to abortion clinics. The administration maintains that the funding amounts to taxpayer funded abortions.

The new rules also prevent Title-X funded clinics from sharing the same offices with abortion providers. Consequently, clinics in that position will be forced to relocate, or shut down.

Title-X funds are already precluded by federal law to fund abortions — as are all federal funds. But the Obama administration found a back door to the ban by allowing clinics to work hand-in-hand with abortion providers.

While federal funds were not directly used to pay off abortionists, the clinics were essentially acting as agents for the abortionists.

Per the AP:

“Congress has long prohibited the use of Title X funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning and (the Department of Health and Human Service’s) recent rule makes that longstanding prohibition a reality,” U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman Mollie Timmons said in a written statement celebrating the 9th Circuit’s ruling. “We look forward to continuing to defend this vital rule against all challenges.”

The AP added tat the new rules follow the “spirit” of the law.

The administration’s new rules are a return to the spirit of rules that were adopted in 1988 and subsequently upheld by the Supreme Court in the 1991 case Rust v. Sullivan. Under the Clinton administration, those rules were abandoned in favor of a requirement that the clinics provide neutral abortion counseling and referrals upon request.

“In light of Supreme Court approval of the 1988 regulations and our broad deference to agencies’ interpretations of the statutes they are charged with implementing, plaintiffs’ legal challenges to the 2019 rule fail,” 9th Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta wrote in her majority opinion.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading


Trump Announces Advisory Board To Expose Research Using Aborted Baby Parts



The Trump administration announced an advisory board to expose research using aborted baby parts.

Amazing how many Christian presidents in the past did not create safeguards to keep this from occurring. Thank you, President Trump, for being a voice for the voiceless!

Life News:

The Trump administration took another step to defend unborn babies Wednesday when it announced the formation of a new ethics board to look into the use of aborted baby body parts in government-funded research.

The new National Institutes of Health (NIH) Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board is one of several ways the Trump administration has been working to end the unethical practice of using aborted baby body parts in taxpayer-funded scientific research.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar is overseeing the creation of the board, which will be made up of 15 non-government employees, including doctors, scientists, ethicists, attorneys and theologians.

The ethics board is tasked with researching the use of aborted baby body parts in scientific research and determining whether it is ethical. The board will create a final report to recommend whether HHS should stop funding such research.

“In providing advice and recommendations on these matters, the Ethics Board will consider, among other things, the use of alternative models, and review and verify the core ethical principles and procedures used in the process to obtain written voluntary informed consent for the donation of tissue,” the HHS announcement states.

Over the past several years, the Trump administration has been listening to pro-life leaders’ pleas to stop using taxpayer funding for research using aborted baby body parts through the NIH. More

Thank God President Trump and the Advisory Board for doing this finally. We need to know who is buying them and what they are doing with the baby’s body parts.

It’s the foulest thing to be doing after a baby is aborted. Then the next thing to do is to shut down and ban the selling of the baby’s aborted body parts. Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry have no right to do this with aborted baby body parts.

Continue Reading


Liberals Now Claim Abortion is a True Christian Value

Ever ready to simply spout a wild claim as if it were true, liberals are now claiming that abortion is a “religious right.”



Ever ready to simply spout a wild claim as if it were true, liberals are now claiming that abortion is a “religious right.”

This time it is the extremists at the left-wing website, Vice, with an article that claims killing babies is perfectly justifiable under the Bible’s teachings and is a quintessentially Christian thing.

Vice laments that the anti-abortion movement has created the narrative for Christians. Abortion is bad; that is the narrative for religious people. But Vice insists that there are Christians who claim that abortion can be justified with Biblical teaching.

“They say the right to abortion is a constitutional one, protected not only by the right to privacy, but by the freedom to exercise religion,” Vice writes.

“There’s a lot of folks who are pro-choice or support reproductive dignity and freedom because of their faith and not in spite of it,” Rev. Katey Zeh, an ordained Baptist minister and CEO of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, told the leftist website.

The article then goes on the delineate all the reasons that abortion is a “religious right” justified under in Judaism, Islam, and Christianity.

For instance, Rev. Zeh insists that abortion is a vital part of “love and compassion and care for the neighbor,” and “eliminating systems of oppression.”

Notice that this ignoramus is essentially claiming that having a baby is a “system of oppression.”

Then the piece claimed that the only reason abortion is perceived as a bad thing among the bulk of religious people is because evil conservatives lit on the idea of using abortion as a political wedge issue.

“[A] political — not theological — effort was made by Republicans, specifically Richard Nixon, to recruit Catholic Democratic voters by polarizing the issue of abortion,” Vice said. “Evangelicals and Protestants later followed as a result of targeted political campaigns hoping to unite Christians under conservative cultural issues.”

In other words, abortion has no religious basis, it is all just political.

The religious right, Zeh told Vice, “doesn’t speak for everybody. But it’s almost served as an erasure of the prophetic work that people were doing, you know, before the 1980s. We’re trying to disrupt the idea that religion equals anti-choice.”

Just like the left went from calling global warming “climate change” because the left needed a different way to sell their lies, now the left is trying to redefine the morality of abortion.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Abortion Wild Britain Doubles Deaths of Down’s Syndrome Babies

The abortion-loving UK has kicked into high gear, doubling the number of late term abortions of babies with Down’s Syndrome.



The abortion-loving United Kingdom has kicked into high gear, doubling the number of late term abortions of babies with Down’s Syndrome in just ten years.

The UK has clearly turned into an abattoir for people with Down’s Syndrome. In fact, it has been for a long time. The UK passed a law that allows parents to kill their babies right up until birth if the child has a disability.

So, the British government has determined that people with disabilities don’t deserve to live.

According to the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children:

The number of late term abortions carried out past 24 week’s gestation on UK children with Down’s syndrome have doubled in the past 10 years, recent figures have revealed. Michael Robinson, SPUC Director of Communications said: “It is barbaric that a child who may have a disability in the UK can be aborted right up to birth. This practice has no place in a civilised society.”

The recent figures, obtained in response to a parliamentary question by Lord Alton, have revealed that in 2018, the number of UK children aborted past 24 weeks gestation following a possible Down’s syndrome diagnosis increased from 11 in 2009 to 23 in 2018.

In addition, the figures also expose that the number of abortions carried out in the UK following a Down’s syndrome diagnosis have risen by almost 30% over the past decade.

Is this “liberalism”?

Is this how caring liberals are?

Apparently so.

Still, British families that have children with Down’s Syndrome are not sitting idly by.

“Over 1,800 people with Down’s syndrome and their families have signed a letter to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, urging him to insure that abortion for disability will not be permitted in Northern Ireland,” the group reported.

This is what liberals want here, folks.

Make no mistake.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Senate Will Vote On Pro-Life Bills To Stop Infanticide And Ban Late-Term Abortions

Why didn’t the Senate do this two years ago when the Republicans had the House?



Senate to vote on banning late-term abortion, infanticide.

Family Research Council staffer Patricia Mosley told senators: “There have been no cases involving prosecutions under the [2002] Born-Alive Infants Protection Act that we know of. Why? Because there is currently no federal criminal statute specifically prohibiting taking the lives of born-alive infants.”


The Senate will soon vote on two major pro-life bills, to ban late-term abortions on babies capable of feeling excruciating pain during abortions and on the Born Alive bill that would stop infanticide and protect babies who survive abortions.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell today filed a procedural motion that would set up a vote for after the Senate takes its President’s Day recess. Once the Senate comes back into session next week, votes could take place on the Pain Capable Unborn Child Act and Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. President Trump has already promised to sign both pro-life bills into law should Congress approve them.

Both pieces of legislation would require a 60-vote threshold since pro-abortion Democrats are likely to filibuster both of them. And the votes on ending the filibuster would give Americans another indication of just how radical two of the leading Democrats running for president are on abortion — Senators Bernie Sanders and Amy Klobuchar. Neither would be expected to vote to end the filibuster and allow votes on either common-sense bill.

The Senate recently held a hearing on the Born Alive bill.

In a hearing called, “The Infant Patient: Ensuring Appropriate Medical Care for Children Born Alive,” Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska made it clear why the bill is needed:

“This hearing is not about overturning Roe v. Wade. In fact, this hearing is not actually about limiting access to abortion at all. This hearing isn’t a debate about third-trimester, or second-trimester, or first-trimester abortion. This hearing is about making sure that every newborn baby has a fighting chance — whether she’s born in a labor and delivery ward or whether she’s born in an abortion clinic.” For once, he urged, can we not “immediately retreat into the fortified and familiar trenches our two parties have occupied for most of the past 47 years?” More

Should babies who survive failed abortions be given the same care as other newborns, or should they be left to die? Should there be any limit on abortions of babies who feel pain? The bills address these questions.


Continue Reading


Bernie Sanders Finally Admits it: Pro-Life Christians Not Welcome in Democrat Party

Bernie Sanders has finally admitted the obvious truth that if you are a pro-life Christian you are no longer welcome in the Democrat Party.



Socialist presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has finally admitted the obvious truth that if you are a pro-life Christian you are no longer welcome in the Democrat Party.

Last Saturday, during an appearance at the radical death cult called NARAL, Sanders admitted that he and his cohorts do not want pro-lifers in the Democrat Party.

The forum was called to discuss so-called “reproductive rights” (not an actual thing), according to New Hampshire Democratic National Committee members Kathy Sullivan and Bill Shaheen. It was aimed at giving candidates the chance to speak on “the threat to our courts and our reproductive rights,” Daily Caller reported.

Naturally, since it was sponsored by the NARAL death cult, every candidate effusively supported the right of women to kill their babies.

But Bernie Sanders went even farther by telling any of the few pro-life Democrats left in the country that they have been ex-communicated from their party.

Bernie was asked about pro-life Democrats. His answer was stark.

Asked if there is “such a thing as a pro-life Democrat in your vision for the party,” Sanders answered that, “I think being pro-choice is an absolutely essential part of being a Democrat.”

Sanders continued saying that he cannot see an argument for opposing abortion. “[W]hen we talk about what a Democrat is, being pro-choice is essential to that vision,” he said.

“If you’re asking me – and I think I may be wrong on this – I think in the Senate, probably 95 percent of the Democrats are pro-choice, the other few are not. In the House, maybe even a higher percentage,” he said. “So that’s kind of what my view is.”

There you have it, America.
If you happen to be a Christian, pro-life Democrat, Bernie Sanders just told you to pound sand.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Buttigieg Tells Woman Her Pro-Life Views Not Welcomed In Democrat Party



Democrat presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg refused to tell a Democrat voter that her pro-life views were welcomed in the party after being repeatedly pressed about the issue.

Kristin Day: “I am a proud pro-life Democrat. So, do you want the support of pro-life Democrats, pro-life Democratic voters? There are about 21 million of us, and if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic Party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion really does include everybody?”


Democrat presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg refused to tell a Democrat voter on Sunday that her pro-life views were welcomed in the party after being repeatedly pressed about the issue during a Fox News town hall event.

“I am a proud pro-life Democrat,” Kristin Day, a member of the audience, told Buttigieg. “So, do you want the support of pro-life Democrats, pro-life Democratic voters? There are about 21 million of us, and if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic Party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion really does include everybody?”

“Well I respect where you’re coming from and I hope to earn your vote, but I’m not going to try to earn your vote by tricking you,” Buttigieg responded. “I am pro-choice and I believe that a woman ought to be able to make that decision. I know that the difference of opinion that you and I have is one that we have come by honestly and the best that I can offer, and it may win your vote, and if not, I understand, the best I can offer is that if we can’t agree on where to draw the line, the next best thing we can do is agree on who should draw the line and in my view it’s the woman who’s faced with that decision in her own life.” More

Pete Buttigieg articulately said to 21 million pro-life Democrats that he supports the killing of infants up to and including 9 months of gestation and she really doesn’t have a place in their party. If she is sincere she will get out of an organization that doesn’t respect life.


Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend