Connect with us

2020

Florida GOP Candidate Laura Loomer Statement Regarding Republican Jewish Coalition

Published

on

Laura Loomer, a staunch pro-Israel candidate, won the GOP primary for Florida’s 21st Congressional District, yet despite claiming they would support any pro-Israel Republican, the Republican Jewish Coalition has not yet endorsed her. Loomer and her thousands of voters want to know why.

In a release, Loomer’s campaign noted that, “on august 18, Laura Loomer pulled off something astonishing” by winning her party’s nomination for the 21st district. Further, she raised more campaign donations than all the other candidates in the race, including the sitting congress woman, Democrat Lois Frankel.

Loomer went on to report that she has now been endorsed by the president of the United States, Congressmen Matt Gaetz and Paul Gossar, Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro, and  others. In addition, GOP National Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel called Loomer a “rock star” and a “change agent” for Florida and the Republican Party.

The statement continues by noting that the Republican Jewish Coalition has promised to endorse any pro-Israel Republican that wins a primary, yet the group has still not endorsed Loomer.

Trending: CDC Quietly Admits That Less than 10,000 Really Died from COVID-19

“Why hasn’t Matt Brooks, Executive Director of the RJC, endorsed Laura Loomer,” the statement asks.

“Does he consider his judgement superior to the President’s, and to everyone else” the campaign noted as supporters?

“Matt Brooks owes those voters and answer,” the campaign insisted.

See the full letter below:

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement

2020

Shock Report: Statistical Analysis of Voting in Pennsylvania Points to Massive Fraud

A new look at the statistics involved in the vote trends in Pennsylvania reveals massive vote fraud.

Published

on

A new look at the statistics involved in the vote trends in Pennsylvania reveals massive vote fraud.

The analysis of the numbers seems to show fraud in Montgomery County, the crooked Democrat county containing Philadelphia and its major suburbs.

The report posted at Revolver.news finds “highly anomalous” voting trends in the corrupt county.

At a high level, our results are suggestive of a new and highly suspicious batch of mail ballots being added to the count sometime between Wednesday early morning and Thursday morning. These ballots are drawn from an implausible distribution that enormously favored Biden and simultaneously harmed Trump (the latter being done in addition by allocating more votes to Jorgensen). Said mail ballots end up being extremely different both from the mail ballots that came before (as measured in NYT data), and the mail ballots that came afterwards (as measured in the county’s own data).

The key evidence is as follows:

⦁ On Thursday November 5th at 9:09am a large batch of 90,022 mail/absentee votes get added that has over 95% support for Biden, but total votes to go up by only 9,534, implying that in-person votes actually went down by 80,488. On its own, this is a very strange irregularity, as ballots cannot disappear, and in-person ballots cannot become mail ballots. Something is wrong in the reported data, the only question is what.

⦁ The new batch of 90,022 mail ballots looks nothing like existing mail ballots. If the update is a data error, it must be a complicated error along multiple dimensions and is unlikely to be a simple typo. The new batch is improbable on four separate dimensions:

⦁ It has a level of support for Biden (over 95%) that is statistically impossible to have come from the same distribution of mail ballots counted up to that point (74.9% for Biden)

⦁ Every comparison of pairs of candidates shows improbable changes. This is important, as it helps rule out the possibility that a single typo in the data drives the pattern.

⦁ Irrespective of the old distribution, the new batch is extremely unlikely on its own terms, as it has a ratio of support for Jorgenson relative to Trump (20%) that is higher than virtually every county in America. The last fact is consistent with aiming to get Biden’s vote share “high but not impossibly high” while simultaneously trying to not give any more votes to Trump than absolutely necessary.

⦁ The distribution of the ballots being removed from the in-person counts is even more implausible (98.1% Biden), making it difficult to explain the overall vote update as being due to genuine mail ballots having been previously incorrectly classified as in-person.

⦁ Anomalies of this magnitude are extremely rare in the NYT database. Montgomery’s reduction of 80,488 in-person votes is the fourth highest vote reduction in the entire database. Over half of these involve changes of less than 100 votes, and 28% involve changes of just one vote. Of the remaining errors, many can be easily understood as examples of exactly the phenomena ruled out above (e.g. simple vote-type misclassifications).

⦁ Independent confirmation of the two numbers suggests Edison’s numbers are accurate reflections of the County data. Edison’s report of total absentee ballots counted in their update at 5:43am Wednesday November 5th is very close to (and slightly below) media twitter reports of total absentee ballots counted a few minutes later in the county data, suggesting that these early Edison absentee vote totals are likely accurate reflections of the underlying county data. Meanwhile, Edison snapshots on November 8th precisely match County snapshots on November 10th.

⦁ To test this hypothesis further, and to help rule out the possibility that this is all due to NYT/Edison data errors, after the initial anomaly was uncovered, we scraped multiple snapshots of the county’s own data at the precinct level. The changes between the two snapshots reveal that the earlier arriving mail ballots (which included the anomalous update) show a significantly higher vote share for Biden than the mail votes which were counted later in the same precinct. This shows that something is changing in the distribution of mail ballots counted within each precinct, and the earlier ballots showed a stronger tendency to favor Biden.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

2020

Remember the ‘Water Main Break’ That Stopped Atlanta Vote Counting? There’s No Evidence It Ever Happened

You might recall that early on Wednesday morning, counting in Atlanta stopped because of a “water main break.”

Published

on

You might recall that early on Wednesday morning, counting in Atlanta stopped because of a “water main break.” It now appears that this incident was a fake. It never happened.

The story pushed by the left-wing media was that very early in the morning, hours after Election Day, a water main broke in the vote counting area in Atlanta, Georgia. This put a halt to the counting until the water main could be repaired.

“According to officials, a water main break at State Farm Arena caused a pipe to burst. The burst pipe was discovered around 6 a.m. Counting of the ballots began at 11 a.m.,” as a CBS affiliate reported that day.

Dozens of outlets reported this so-called water main break, too.

In any case, the result was that at least 40,000 votes were put on hold at the time.

But, did this water main break ever actually happen? Not according to Gateway Pundit:

One Georgia resident, attorney Paul J. Dzikowski, attempted to obtain more information on the reported water main break in Atlanta. He sent a letter to and requested any information related to the water main break under the Georgia Open Records Act.

Mr. Dzikowski was told that there are no work orders issued by the county to fix any water main, and that there was just a small leak that was contained quickly.

In other words, the “burst water main” story is a lie.

So, what was the lie used to cover up?

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

2020

Federal Election Commissioner Trey Trainor Confirms There Is Vote Fraud

Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor asserted that it is clear that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 election.

Published

on

Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor asserted that it is clear that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 election.

Trainor appeared on Newsmax last week and admitted that his agency does see vote fraud in the 2020 elections.

“I do believe that there is voter fraud taking place in these places,” he said. “Otherwise they would allow the observers to go in.”

Despite winning a court order, which allows the Trump campaign to send observers to watch ballot counting in Pennsylvania from six feet away, Trainor said ballot watchers “have not been allowed into the polling locations in a meaningful way.”

He said when observers have been permitted to watch, the goalpost has been moved away from the six feet required by the court order.

“They have not been allowed that meaningful access,” he said, adding there has not been transparency in the election.

This was a stolen election. There is no doubt whatever.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

2020

Tens of Thousands of Pennsylvania Ballots Returned Earlier Than Sent Date Claimed

Another look at this stolen election shows that more than 100,000 votes in Pennsylvania reek of fraud.

Published

on

Another look at this stolen election shows that more than 100,000 votes in Pennsylvania reek of fraud.

According to a researcher, 20,000 absentee votes have outright fake return dates and another 80,000 have questionable dates on them.

Per the Epoch Times:

More than 20,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania have impossible return dates and another more than 80,000 have return dates that raise questions, according to a researcher’s analysis of the state’s voter database.

Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times, while nearly 35,000 were returned on the same day they were mailed out. Another more than 23,000 have a return date earlier than the sent date. More than 9,000 have no sent date.

The state’s voter records are being scrutinized as President Donald Trump is challenging the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania and other states where his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, holds a tight lead. The Trump campaign is alleging that invalid ballots have been counted for Democrats and valid ballots for Republicans were thrown away.

Just more examples of fraud in Democrat areas in this election.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

2020

Trump Associates Planning to Buy Out Newsmax TV to Bury Fox News

Allies of President Trump are reportedly looking at buying upstart cable news network Newsmax and to build it into a rial to crush Fox News.

Published

on

Allies of President Donald Trump are reportedly looking at buying upstart cable news network Newsmax and to build it into a rial to crush Fox News.

According to Yahoo News, “There are ongoing discussions between Newsmax and Hicks Equity Partners, an investment firm connected to the Republican National Committee, according to the Journal. The deal would include a video-streaming service.”

It might not be a bad idea. After all, Newsmax is already rising quickly in the ratings. A recent ratings period, for instance, saw Newsmax surge ahead of both CNBC and Fox Business Network.

So, investing heavily in a network that is already growing is not a bad plan.

Trump took a swipe at Fox recently:

Yahoo adds:

But since the week of the election, the outlet has received a sharp boost of 156% to its viewership, according to the Wall Street Journal. During that same time frame, Fox received about 6 million viewers on average. Newsmax counted 1 million viewers during prime-time TV hours, the Journal reported.

There have been rumors circulating for nearly a decade that Trump was looking to start his own news network. I guess we’ll see what he does after his presidency… whether that is next year or four years from now.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

2020

Judge Hands Trump Big Win Saying Pennsylvania Exceeded Law by Extending Election Deadline

A Penn. judge handed the Trump campaign a big win by ruling that state election officials can’t count ballots that were not properly certified.

Published

on

A Pennsylvania judge handed the Trump campaign a big win by ruling that state election officials can’t count ballots that were not properly certified as legal before the Nov. 9 deadline.

The judge excluded ballots that were filed provisionally by voters who did not have proof of identification as legal Pennsylvania residents and then subsequently failed to prove their legal status by the Nov. 9 deadline.

Existing Pennsylvania law maintains that voters who had to cast provisional ballots can “cure” their vote by the Nov. 9 deadline. But it they do not provide proof of residence by Nov. 9, their ballots are thrown out.

But Democrats were attempting to count these ballots despite not satisfying the law and the Trump campaign disputed them. Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar even summarily announced that the Nov. 9 deadline was extended to Nov. 12.

However, the judge ruled that Boockvar “lacked statutory authority” to change the dates.

Per Just The News:

“[T]he Court concludes that Respondent Kathy Boockvar, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth, lacked statutory authority to issue the November 1, 2020, guidance to Respondents County Boards of Elections insofar as that guidance purported to change the deadline … for certain electors to verify proof of identification,” Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt said in a court order.

“Accordingly, the court hereby orders the respondents County Board of Elections are enjoined from counting any ballots that have been segregated pursuant to Paragraph 1 of this court’s order dated November 5, 2020, granting a special injunction,” Leavitt also wrote.

The conclusion is effectively what the Trump campaign argued, saying Boockvar had exceeded her authority.

The ruling is correct. No Secretary of State has the power to summarily alter voting laws. That is the duty of the legislature, not state officials or judges.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

2020

Joe Biden Did Worse Than Hillary Except in the 4 Cities He Needed to Beat Trump

Just another example of the fraud of Biden’s win: he did worse than Hillary everywhere in the country except the four big cities he needed to beat Trump.

Published

on

Just another example of the fraud of Biden’s win: he did worse than Hillary everywhere in the country except the four big cities he needed to beat Trump.

Yeah, that’s not suspicious at all, huh?

A polling expert looking at the results of the 2020 election found this strange fact.

When he looked at the data, pollster Patrick Basham found a curious result (per Townhall):

“If you count the ballot fraud, most pollsters clearly failed. If you don’t include the fraudulent ballots, most pollsters failed on a spectacular scale,” wrote Basham. Yet, here’s where things get fishy in the 2020 race which he mentions at the end of his column. He cites Richard Baris of Big Data Poll who noted something funny about Biden’s numbers in the cities, how it lagged behind Clinton’s numbers, but shot off to the moon in these four cities. Just take a look at the states in which these cities are located as well:

How curious that, as Baris notes, “Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years. Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”

And then there was this: “Robert Barnes, the foremost election analyst, observes in these ‘big cities in swing states run by Democrats…the vote even exceeded the number of registered voters.'”

Imagine that, huh?

Democrats only got a huge surge of votes in just the places they needed to beat Trump and nowhere else in the country.

It is, of course, statistically impossible.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider


Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
 
Send this to a friend