Connect with us


ELECTION DAY 2019: Big GOP Wins in Miss., Kentucky, But Wiped Out in Virginia

The GOP made strong gains in most areas of the country except Virginia which completed its turn from red to blue by wiping out the Republican Party.



For Election Day 2019, yesterday, the GOP made strong gains in most areas of the country except Virginia which seems to have completed its turn from red to blue with a wipe out of the Republican Party.

First the bad news: In Virginia, the Democrat Party has succeeded in taking complete control of the state legislature for the first time in decades with Tuesday’s elections. Both the state’s House of Delegates and its State Senate went blue.

Republicans had held one-seat majorities in both chambers until yesterday’s vote. But a large number of competitive seats went blue after all the votes were counted. The House now has a nine-seat Democrat majority and in the Senate is is three seats. Democrats also already control the state-side offices, so that gives the Democrats full control of the state for the first time since 1993.

For those watching politics in Virginia, this is not really much of a surprise. Virginia has been turning Democrat for years before Trump came to office. So, the vote in Virginia is not entirely spurred by anti-Trumpism.

Trending: Biden Believes Virus Relief Checks Are Being Held Up Because Trump Wants To Physically Sign Them

However, Republicans did well in nearly every other state.

Firstly, even in Democrat-controlled Tucson, Arizona, voters rejected a proposal that the city be made into a so-called “sanctuary” city. So, even Democrats wised up in Tucson.

In Kentucky, it was mostly good news for the GOP, though the race for governor was called for the Democrat.

In the governor’s race, Democrat Andy Bashear won by only a few thousand votes. However, incumbent Republican Matt Bevin is not conceding and wants the official re-count system to do its work. However, in the rest of the state, Democrats fared poorly.

Kentucky’s down ballot was a clean win for the GOP and state Republicans point out that the combative Bevin was almost dragged over the finish line by the strength of the down ballot. Republicans in Kentucky say that their loss of the Gov’s race is because Bevin is a flawed and unpopular person, not because the state does not like Republicans. And there is quite a lot of evidence that this is true, too.

In fact, Kentucky found its first black Republican ever elected to the state Attorney General’s office. Daniel Cameron was also endorsed by Donald Trump.

In Mississippi, the GOP also made a sweep. GOP candidate Tate Reeves, the current Lt. Gov., beat a strong challenge from Democrat Attorney General Jim Hood, the latter of whom ran a strong campaign as a moderate Democrat.

Also, races in Indiana proved to strengthen the Indiana GOP. One low spot, though, was Indiana’s Hamilton County which went Democrat for the first time in years.

The media will focus on Virginia turning blue and the likely loss of Kentucky’s incumbent Republican governor, but the news really isn’t all that bad for the GOP.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.



Soros-Backed Leftist US Local Prosecutors Thriving

While Trump tries to remake the federal courts, progressive state prosecutors are making huge inroads.



Progressives have zeroed in on electing prosecutors as an avenue for criminal justice reform, and the billionaire George Soros provided the cash to make it all happen.

Democrats don’t care about keeping people safe. Instead of law and order, the criminal left wants lawlessness and chaos to take over our cities. 


Arlington (United States) (AFP) – On the national level, President Donald Trump is appointing judges by the dozens to positions on US federal courts, ensuring a conservative tilt for a generation.

But on the local level, a small group of progressive state prosecutors have been elected, and they have big ideas about criminal justice reform.

Parisa Dehghani-Tafti — who is now the top prosecutor in northern Virginia’s Arlington county in the Washington suburbs — knows she is not the “typical” candidate for the job.

“I am an immigrant. I grew up very poor. I have done some (public) defender work,” says the 46-year-old, who was born in Iran, and is a mother to two black children.

“The federal judiciary is changing, it’s becoming very conservative. It’s even more important that folks who are reform-informed people are running and engaged in the local system,” she told AFP.

“We are now the frontline.”

Since he won the White House, Trump has named nearly 200 judges to the federal bench. In that time, about 40 unorthodox prosecutors — one is even a tattooed biker — have taken office.

For Miriam Krinsky — a former federal prosecutor and the executive director of Fair and Just Prosecution (FJP), which is supporting these local attorneys — the progressives represent a “drop in the ocean.”

But many of them have emerged in major cities such as Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, and Orlando: “jurisdictions that impact large numbers in terms of prison population.”

– ‘Justice League’ –

The United States has the largest number of prison detainees in the world at more than 2.2 million, according to the World Prison Brief database. More

“For Hadar Aviram, a professor at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, it’s too soon to know what kind of impact the prosecutors are having on prison populations and racial justice.”

There is no such thing as “racial justice.” There is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Everything else is a carefully orchestrated disinformation campaign that ultimately results in the kind of “justice” recently manifested in NYC, where a man nicknamed ‘serial subway scammer’ just got arrested for the 140th time, after his no bail release following his 139th arrest.

Continue Reading


Republican Crushed Democrat in the Texas Special Election that Media Called a ‘Bellwether’ Contest

A Republican cruised to an easy election win in a Texas special election that the media desperately hoped the Democrat would win.



On Tuesday, a Republican cruised to an easy election win in a Texas special election that the media desperately hoped the Democrat would win.

Businessman Gary Gates easily crushed his Democrat opponent, Eliz Markowitz, in the suburban Houston special election that many assumed the Democrat would win because… you know… everyone hates Trump.

Tuesday’s loss makes Markowitz a two-time election loser.

Democrats flooded the district with outside cash in the hopes that Markowitz could pick off a Republican seat in the Texas legislature.

The liberals had hoped to proclaim that Texas is “in play” for 2020 by defeating the Republican, but it was not to be. Republican Gates picked up 58 percent of the votes in the district and walked away with the election.

“Today, voters resoundingly rejected the Democrats’ socialist ideology and took a major step toward keeping Texas red. As we look ahead to the 2020 election, we must be prepared to replicate this success across the state if we are to secure a more prosperous future for Texas,” GOP Gov. Greg Abbott said in a celebratory statement.

Perhaps a key mistake was that Markowitz relied heavily on an endorsement from loser Democrat “Beto” O’Rourke. He was seen everywhere in the campaign as a Markowitz booster and Republican voters soon became so incensed over this loser’s intrusion into their local race that they turned out in droves for Gates.

Still, the district is not as red as it used to be. Trump only won the district by ten points and Ted Cruz only won it by three for his 2018 Senate re-election campaign. It is clear why Democrats hoped that they just might get an upset in the district.

Still, the liberal party lost. Naturally, Democrats tried to spin the loss as a win that they will easily pick it up next time.

We’ll see.

But for now, another Texas Republican has been added to the Lone Star State’s firmament. And the left lost its prayed-for talking point with which to attack Trump.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


NBC Declares Voting For Trump May Be Unconstitutional



President Trump Accuses Nancy Pelosi Of Quid Pro Quo, Suggests Impeaching Her

Trump voters motivated by racism may be violating the Constitution. Can they be stopped?

NBC News commentary piece arguing that voting for Trump is unconstitutional. Discusses legal remedies. ‘Censuring’ individual voters would be ‘difficult.’ Nullifying election even harder. Still, other possibilities.

The conversation gets heated on twitter:
Continue Reading


Watchdog Finds Millions of Illegal Voter Registrations in Calif., Penn., Col., North Carolina, Virginia

Judicial Watch Finds Millions of ‘Extra’ Registrants on Voting Rolls – Warns California, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Colorado, Virginia.



Judicial Watch Finds Millions of ‘Extra’ Registrants on Voting Rolls – Warns California, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Colorado, Virginia to Clean Up Voting Rolls or Face a Federal Lawsuit

At Least 2.5 Million Extra Names on Voting Rolls, Drop of One Million After Successful Judicial Watch Lawsuits

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it is continuing its efforts to force states and counties across the nation to comply with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), by sending notice-of-violation letters to 19 large counties in five states that it intends to sue unless the jurisdictions take steps to comply with the law and remove ineligible voter registrations within 90 days. Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act requires jurisdictions to take reasonable efforts to remove ineligible registrations from its rolls.

Despite successful litigation by Judicial Watch to bring counties and states into compliance with the National Voter Registration Act, voter registration lists across the country remain significantly out of date. According to Judicial Watch’s analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) this year, there are 378 counties nationwide that have more voter registrations than citizens living there and old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million registrations over the 100%-registered mark, which is a drop of about one million from Judicial Watch’s previous analysis of voter registration data. Although San Diego County removed 500,000 inactive names from voter rolls following Judicial Watch’s settlement with Los Angeles County, San Diego still has a registration rate of 117% and has one of the highest registration rates in the county.

In the latest round of warning letters, Judicial Watch explains that implausibly high registration rates raise legal concerns:

An unusually high registration rate suggests that a jurisdiction is not removing voters who have died or who have moved elsewhere, as required by [federal law].

Judicial Watch also considers how many registrations were ultimately removed from the voter rolls because a registrant [had moved]. If few or no voters were removed…the jurisdiction is obviously failing to comply . . . States must report the number of such removals to the EAC.

Judicial Watch found major voting list issues in California, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Virginia, and Colorado. The following counties have excessive registration rates or have failed to cancel sufficient numbers of ineligible registrations:

Jefferson County

Imperial County
Monterey County
Orange County
Riverside County
San Diego County
San Francisco County
San Mateo County
Santa Clara County
Solano County
Stanislaus County
Yolo County

North Carolina
Guilford County
Mecklenburg County

Fairfax County

Allegheny County
Bucks County
Chester County
Delaware County

“Dirty voting rolls can mean dirty elections and Judicial Watch will insist, in court if necessary, that states follow federal law to clean up their voting rolls,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Previous Judicial Watch lawsuits have already led to major cleanups in California, Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio – but more needs to be done. It is common sense that voters who die or move away be removed from the voting rolls.”

Continue Reading


Census Disproves Liberal Theory that Traditional, White America is Nearly Dead

For years, now, we have been told by giddy liberals that traditional, white America is dying out and a new, liberal America is taking over.



For years, now, we have been told by giddy liberals that traditional, white America is dying out and a new, liberal America is taking over. But a look at the most recent Census numbers seems to disprove that theory.

This theory of a left-wing “ascendant America” was reviewed by Michael Barone, one of the best political writers in the country. And Barone found the left’s jubilant proclamations suspect, at least if you look at the numbers.

Barone accepted that some of America’s social direction has been lurching leftward. “Barack Obama was elected and reelected president in 2008 and 2012, and Democrats won majorities in House contests in 2006, 2008, and 2018,” he noted.

Yet it does not look like that these temporary Democrat advances are much of a lock on the future.

“But those are slimmer pickings than the emerging majorities were promised. And President Trump’s victory in 2016 has made a mockery of the predictions,” Barone noted. “He wasn’t ascendant America’s choice. Like (but no more so than) other Republicans, he ran way behind among nonwhites. From millennials and Generation Z, he evokes, “OK, boomer.” Feminists feel queasy at the mention of his name.”

Demographics, it turns out, don’t automatically turn into destiny. Ascendant groups’ triumphalism can coalesce those with opposite values into unaccustomed unity and enthusiasm. Ascendant leaders, not cautioned by sympathetic media, can concoct extreme policies (Green New Deal, anyone?) unsellable to most voters.

And perhaps ascendant groups, with their low birth rates, may not become as ascendant as demographers expected.

Barone goes on to point out that despite the left’s claims that their ideas and their voter base will grow so large as to overtake and replace conservative “white” America, it does not seem that their prediction is actually coming to pass.

Conservative ideas appear hardier than the left imagined. Worse, their blue states are losing population — and representation in Congress — faster than the red states.

Barone went on to point out that the Census seems to be showing that liberal states are losing enough voters to also lose a few congressmen in the House of Representatives, not to mention the Electoral College.

“Reapportionment, it appears, would work to the advantage of Trump, were it done before the 2020 election — the 30 states he carried in 2016 seem likely to gain three congressional seats and electoral votes,” Barone wrote.

Barone went on to detail many of those changes and concluded noting, “That leaves Democrats, however ascendant they may feel, with the psephological disadvantage of having their votes heavily concentrated in low-growth metro areas while opposition voters are more evenly spread out over the faster-growing remainder of the country.”

Democrats are not winning the way they think.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Democrat Rep. Barbara Lee: ‘We Need The U.N.’ To Monitor Our 2020 Election

Thanks but no thanks!



Democrat Rep. Barbara Lee: ‘We Need the U.N.’ To Monitor Our 2020 Election

Democrat Rep. Barbara Lee is making a “personal” plea that the United States recruit foreign election monitors from the United Nations. Claiming these “monitors” would prevent Republicans from engaging in their imaginary “voter suppression” tactics.

Speaking at “She The People 2019,” Lee posited that the only way to prevent voter suppression and foreign influence in our 2020 Presidential election would be to bring in foreign influence from the United Nations.

“I personally want to ask the U.N. to come in, I’ve observed elections all over the world, and I think right now we need election observers from all over the world coming to monitor and look at these tactics … so that maybe if we put some sunshine on it, you know, at least we’ll be able to cast our vote until we get all of these laws changed.”

Woman: “I know we can;t get all of our hopes into the [inaudible] process, but I know it’s at least one less black body laying in the street. If we don’t try to change who’s in power, we’re never going to have the ability to win on our own issues. And I believe that voting is that first step. I truly believe that if voting were so important, they wouldn’t try so hard to stop us from doing it.”


Democrat Rep. Barbara Lee: “Thank you very much. And you just laid out the story of everyone in our country who have been marginalized, who would vote for the progressive agenda and who the right-wing in this country want to suppress. Voter suppression is alive and well. So in Congress, of course, we’re working on — we have legislation, H.R.4, that would restore the Voting Rights Act because, you know, the Voting Rights Act was totally gutted.

We also have hearings that are being conducted around the country, headed by Congresswoman Marcia Fudge to really build the record so that we can move forward with even stronger legislation. But aside from the legislative efforts to restore the Voting Rights Act, we have to work at the state and local level in terms of making sure that these Voter ID laws are not passed, making sure that we have — and we’re into this next election cycle right now.

Monitors, lawyers, people watching the polls all the time, I personally want to ask the U.N. to come in. I’ve observed elections all over the world, and I think right now we need election observers from all over the world to come and to monitor and to look at these tactics that you just mentioned so that maybe if we put some sunshine on it, you know, at least we’ll be able to cast our vote until we can get all of these laws changed. But I want to say to you, and I say this all the time to especially young people and people of color, believe me, your vote counts.”

Continue Reading


Wall Street Donors Quietly Warn Democrats They’ll Sit Out 2020 if Party Picks Elizabeth Warren

Wall Street donors have begun to warn the Democrats that they may sit out 2020 if they pick the anti-business, anti-capitalist Warren as their 2020 nominee.



With Joe Biden dropping in the polls and Elizabeth Warren replacing him at the top, some Wall Street donors have begun to warn the Democrat Party that they may sit out the 2020 election if they pick the anti-business, anti-capitalist Warren as their 2020 nominee.

Former Vice President Joe Biden has begun to slip in many recent polls as his constant lies and gaffes begin to take their toll. And as Biden continues to appear less than able — and maybe even senile — on the campaign trail, many Democrat voters have begun to shift to Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.

That shift has not been welcome news for the usually loyal Wall Street donors who commonly back the left-wing party under the assumption that all the anti-business hot air the party spews won’t really end up redounding on them.

But they appear to fear that if Warren wins the nomination, that hot air will turn to actual policies because Warren has been virulently socialist, anti-business, and anti-financial sector.

According to CNBC, some of these big-money donors are getting a bit worried.

In recent weeks, CNBC spoke to several high-dollar Democratic donors and fundraisers in the business community and found that this opinion was becoming widely shared as Warren, an outspoken critic of big banks and corporations, gains momentum against Joe Biden in the 2020 race.

“You’re in a box because you’re a Democrat and you’re thinking, ‘I want to help the party, but she’s going to hurt me, so I’m going to help President Trump,’” said a senior private equity executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity in fear of retribution by party leaders. The executive said this Wednesday, a day after Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced that the House would begin a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump.

They are even a bit miffed that Warren has so publicly refused to take their donations.

Bankers are also unhappy with a Warren nomination:

“They will not support her. It would be like shutting down their industry,” an executive at one of the nation’s largest banks told CNBC, also speaking on condition of anonymity. This person said Warren’s policies could be worse for Wall Street than those of President Barack Obama, who signed the Dodd-Frank bank regulation bill in the wake of the 2008 financial meltdown.

To compound matters, Warren even retweeted the CNBC report with a slap at the Wall Streeters saying she “approved this message.”

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend