Connect with us


Democrats Elect Convicted Sex Offender to Office in Virginia

On Tuesday, Virginia Democrats elected a disbarred lawyer and convicted sex offender to the Virginia State Senate.



On Tuesday, Virginia Democrats elected a disbarred lawyer and convicted sex offender to the Virginia State Senate, proving once again that Democrats don’t really care about holding sex offenders to account, don’t care about the law, and don’t care about morals in any way, shape, or form.

Immoral, callous Democrat voters in Virginia’s 16th Senate District elected reprobate Joe Morrissey to serve in the upper chamber in last week’s elections. Morrissey has a horrendous record of sexually abusing a teenage girl, numerous jailings for contempt of court, and a disbarment for his unprofessional behavior in court when he was a lawyer.

Morrissey was once a member of Virginia’s House of Delegates but had to resign after being convicted of sexually abusing his 17-year-old secretary in 2015.

Yet, Virginia Democrats elected this cretin to office once again.

Trending: Female Student Breaks Down In Tears As School Board Grants Boys Access To Girls Locker Room

Morrissey has a long and disgusting history of behavioral issues.

When he was disbarred by the state’s legal community, the court in his case ruled that he had a “5-year history of contempt citations, reprimands, fines, suspensions, and even incarcerations arising from unprofessional conduct mostly involving an uncontrollable temper, inappropriate responses to stress and dishonesty.”

Daily Caller adds:

Morrissey, now 61, was in his 50’s when he was accused of having sex with his 17-year-old secretary, to whom he is now married. He claimed he did nothing wrong, but pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in 2015 while admitting there was enough evidence to convict him. (This often happens to innocent and guilty defendants alike, they plead to a lesser crime to avoid worse consequences in front of a jury for a larger crime.) The girl and her mother also denied anything untoward was happening between the two, though he was initially indicted on charges of possessing and distributing child pornography (he had, according to prosecutors, a nude photograph of the girl and had sent it to a friend) and the electronic solicitation of a minor.

Morrissey had resigned as a legislator but won it back in a special election. He sailed to victory in a primary for state Senate earlier this year, defeating incumbent state Sen. Rosalyn Dance by 14 points.

Style Weekly reported:

Warren, who then went by Myrna Pride, was a receptionist at Morrissey’s law firm when she was 17. Morrissey was accused of having sex with her when she was underage, a charge both of them deny.

In December, Morrissey entered an Alford plea in the case, denying guilt but acknowledging evidence against him. He received a six-month sentence that was reduced to a three-month work-release term. He served it while holding the 74th District seat in the House of Delegates, to which he was re-elected in January.

Morrissey seems carefree about his health in declaring that he and Warren eventually want to have four children together. He also has three daughters from other relationships, ages 3, 28 and 29.

So, Democrats have elected a man who abused a teenage girl and impregnated her three times, a man who is such a problem that he lost his law license, and a man who has served time in jail.

Meanwhile, what did the Republicans do in that race on Tuesday?

Not a thing. The GOP didn’t even bother to field a candidate in the race.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.



The Most Important Parts of Gordon Sondland’s Impeachment Inquiry Testimony



The Democrats have hailed the impeachment inquiry testimony of Gordon Sondland, U.S. ambassador to the European Union, as “proof” that Trump is evil. But his testimony does not really stand up to close scrutiny.

Indeed, Sondland’s testimony is very contradictory. On one hand he said he believed there was a “quid pro quo” but then in other comments he said there was not.

Sondland initially said that Trump demanded that Ukraine’s new president would have to announce that his government was to launch an investigation into the Biden’s in order to be afforded a meeting with Trump in the White House.

Sondland added that he “assumed” that Trump was also demanding a quid pro quo so that Ukraine would get its $400 million in military aid that Congress had approved.

But then, Sondland admitted in the hearings that Trump actually told him that there was no quid pro quo.

This is a direct contradiction.

But it also shows that Sondland’s “testimony” is based on his assumptions, not his actual knowledge.

This fact demolishes the Democrat’s claims that Sondland is a reliable witness because it proves that he didn’t actually witness anything at all. He just assumed it all. Essentially, he invented it in his head.

So, what were the main points in Sondland’s testimony?

His first point — the one the Democrats went wild over — that Trump did impose a quid pro quo on Ukraine for the foreign nation to get a White House meeting.

“I know that members of this committee have frequently framed these complicated issues in the form of a simple question: Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland said. “As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House call and White House meeting, the answer is yes.”

Despite the breathless proclamations by Democrats, though, Sondland also admitted he had no firsthand knowledge of this supposed requirement.

Another point that Sondland made that undermines the Democrat’s claims is that the president said he wants nothing.

“I finally called the president. I believe I just asked him an open-ended question, Mr. Chairman,” Sondland said in his testimony.

Sondland said he asked Trump, “What do you want from Ukraine? I keep hearing all these different ideas and theories and this and that. What do you want?”

“It was a very short, abrupt conversation. He was not in a good mood. He said, ‘I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo,” he said Trump told him.

Sondland also said that all the right administration personnel knew about what Trump was doing with Ukraine. That also defeats the Democrat’s claims that Trump has gone rogue.

Democrats have tried to claim Trump was carrying on an “irregular” foreign policy.

But Sondland knocked that down saying, “I’m not sure how someone could characterize something as an irregular channel when you’re talking to the president of the United States, the secretary of state, the national security adviser, the chief of staff at the White House, the secretary of energy. I don’t know how that’s irregular.”

The media is not really reporting all this, but the truth is, what Sondland actually said during his testimony totally demolishes everything the Democrats have been claiming.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


FBI Wants to Interview ‘Whistleblower,’ as He’s Called Before Congress with Hunter Biden

Two developments occurred for the Ukraine “whistleblower.” The FBI noted that they want to talk to him, but GOP Rep. Devin Nunes also issued a subpoena.



Two developments occurred for the Democrat’s Ukraine “whistleblower” on Wednesday. Not only has the FBI noted that they want to talk to him, but GOP Rep. Devin Nunes has issued a subpoena for both the whistleblower as well as former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter.

On Wednesday it was reported that an FBI agent from the Washington, D.C., field office contacted the whistleblower’s lawyers and asked for an interview with the officially unnamed CIA operative that most news outlets have identified as Eric Ciaramella.

The requested interview has not yet been scheduled, according to the reports.

After being attacked by House Intelligence Committee Chairman for threatening to name the so-called “whistleblower” in a congressional hearing, Republican Rep. Nunes has announced that he is going to exercise his authority as an intel committee member to subpoena people to appear before the committee.

Nunes said he is sending a subpoena for the “whistleblower” as well as former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.

Nunes announced his subpoena in a letter to the committee chairman, Democrat Adam Schiff:

Schiff shut Nunes down during Tuesday’s committee hearing when he asked Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman who he spoke to on July 26, the day after the president’s call with Ukrainian President Zelensky.

“Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, did you discuss the July 25th phone call with anyone outside the White House on July 25th or the 26th and if so with whom?” Nunes asked Vindman.

Vindman admitted that he had spoken to someone. But before he got a chance to answer further, Democrat Schiff jumped in saying, “we need to protect the whistleblower,” and shut Nunes down, stopping Vindman from answering.

“I want to make sure that there is no effort to out the whistleblower through these proceedings,” Schiff bloviated. “If the witness has a good faith belief that this may reveal the identity of the whistleblower, that is not the purpose that we’re here for. I want to advise the witness accordingly.”

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Hunter Biden Claimed He Did Not Impregnate Woman But DNA Says Something Different



Hunter Biden is the father of an Arkansas woman’s child, paternity test confirms and the 28-year-old Lunden Alexis Roberts is demanding child support for their baby, who is now eligible for Secret Service protection because of grandpa Joe’s political status.


Hunter Biden, the son of former Vice President and current Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, had claimed earlier this year that he did not father a child with an Arkansas woman while he was living with the widow of his deceased brother. Biden even agreed to take a DNA test to prove that he was not the father.

The results from the DNA test were released on Wednesday, and they reportedly show that Biden is the father of the child.

“DNA testing has established, ‘with scientific certainty,’ that Hunter Biden is the father of an Arkansas baby, according to a motion filed Wednesday in Independence County on behalf of the child’s mother, Lunden Alexis Roberts,” The Arkansas Democrat Gazette reported. “Hunter Biden, who initially denied having sexual relations with Roberts, eventually agreed to take a DNA test, according to documents filed by Roberts’ attorney, Clint Lancaster.”

The Arkansas Democrat Gazette added that, according to the filing, Hunter Biden “is not expected to challenge the results of the DNA test or the testing process.” More

What is with these people and their DNA tests that they know they are going to fail, claiming the opposite? Another reminder that you can’t trust Hunter Biden to tell you the truth.

Getting him under oath to testify before Congress or the Senate could be dicey if you don’t know when he’s lying or telling the truth. Given past behavior, you can probably bet that he’s lying!

Motion in Hunter Biden pate… by Scott Carroll on Scribd

Continue Reading


DISASTER for Democrats: Impeachment Hearings TV Ratings Have Cratered

These faux impeachment hearings have been a major disaster for the Democrats, at least as far as the TV ratings go. Nobody is watching. Nobody cares.



These faux impeachment hearings have been a major disaster for the Democrats, at least as far as the TV ratings go. Nobody is watching. Nobody cares.

As House Democrats hit their second week of fake impeachment hearings, the Democrats have not warmed America up to the fever pitch that Democrats need for impeachment.

The breathless media and the Democrats have jumped onto rooftops to scream that the fake “witnesses” the Democrats have pushed before a House committee have each left “bombshell” testimony that damns the president for quid pro quo… or bribery… or something.

These “bombshells” prove the evils of orange man, the Democrats insist.

Yet… America simply does not care. Ratings for the TV extravaganza have been horrible.

According to a report by The Hill, viewership tumbled by more than one million for last Friday’s proceedings.

“Nielsen Media Research data showed 12.7 million people tuning in to the second day of the impeachment hearings across ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox News, CNN and MSNBC,” The Hill reported.

Fox had the biggest audience (like always) with 2.8 million viewers and the others went down exponentially from there. But Friday’s ratings collapsed 35 percent over the first day on Wednesday.

The ratings are a huge disappointment for Democrats, especially compared to other recent Washington testimony events. In February, former Trump personal attorney and fixer Michael Cohen’s testimony realized 15.8 million viewers. And in July 13 million tuned in to watch the senile Robert Mueller testify about his empty Russia investigation.

Meanwhile, more than 20 million Americans tuned in to watch the confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh and the lies spewed by whackjob Christine Blasey Ford.

In the universe of Washington events, this impeachment imbroglio is a huge failure for the Democrat Party.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Army Officer Who Knew Him Says Lt. Col. Vindman Has History of Anti-American Behavior

A Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army who says he knew Democrat impeachment witness Lt. Col. Alex Vindman says that Vindman has a long history of anti-American comments and behavior.



A Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army who says he knew Democrat impeachment witness Lt. Col. Alex Vindman says that Vindman has a long history of anti-American comments and behavior.

Lt. Col. (retired) Jim Hickman jumped to Twitter not long ago to relay the impression he formed of Vindman when he worked with him back in 2013.

“I know LTC Alex Vindman from a Combined US-Russian exercise called Atlas Vision 13 in Grafenwoher, GE,” Hickman tweeted. “He worked w/the Russian Embassy & I was assigned to the JMTC (Joint Multinational Training Command), w/in USAREUR (US Army Europe).”

But the impression was NOT good, to say the least.

Hickeman went on with this damning portrayal of Vndman’s interactions with American and foreign troops during the exercise:

He worked coordination w/the Russian 15th Peacekeeping Brigade, & I was in charge of all Simulations planning, as well as assisting the USAREUR Lead Planner as the Senior Military Planner.

The following account of LTC Vindman’s words & actions are completely accurate to the best of my recollection & have been corroborated by others. We interacted on several different occasions throughout the planning cycle, but it was during the actual execution of the exercise, that we had an issue relevant to his recent testimony. As stated earlier, Atlas Vision 12 was conducted at JMTC in the VBS2 (Virtual Battle Simulations 2) Classrooms for Simulation.

Vindman, who was a Major at the time, was sitting in one of the classrooms talking to the US & Russian Soldiers, as well as the young Officers & GS Employees about America, Russia, & Obama. He was apologetic of American culture, laughed about Americans not being educated or worldly, & really talked up Obama & globalism to the point of uncomfortable.

He would speak w/the Russian Soldiers & laugh as if at the expense of the US personnel. It was so uncomfortable & unprofessional, one of the GS employees came & told me everything above. I walked over & sat w/in earshot of Vindman, & sure enough, all was confirmed.

One comment truly struck me as odd, & it was w/respect to American’s falsely thinking they’re exceptional, when he said, “He [Obama] is working on that now.” And he said it w/a snide ‘I know a secret’ look on his face. I honestly don’t know what it meant, it just sounded like an odd thing to say.

Regardless, after hearing him bash America a few times in front of subordinates, Russians, & GS Employees, as well as, hearing an earful about globalization, Obama’s plan, etc…I’d had enough. I tapped him on the shoulder & asked him to step outside.

At that point I verbally reprimanded him for his actions, & I’ll leave it at that, so as not to be unprofessional myself. The bottom-line is LTC Vindman was a partisan Democrat at least as far back as 2012. So much so, junior officers & soldiers felt uncomfortable around him.

This is not your professional, field-grade officer, who has the character & integrity to do the right thing. Do not let the uniform fool you…he is a political activist in uniform. I pray our nation will drop this hate, vitriol & division, & unite as our founding fathers intended!

(Note: Hickman originally said he worked with Vindman during Atlas Vision 12, but in a followup tweet said he remembered it was actually Atlas Vision 13.)

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Report: Schiff’s ‘Whistleblower’ Coordinated Attack on Trump with Alexander Vindman

A new report alleges that Democrat Adam Schiff’s so-called “whistleblower” coordinated his attack on President Donald Trump with Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman.



A new report alleges that Democrat Adam Schiff’s so-called “whistleblower” coordinated his attack on President Donald Trump with Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the Democrat’s recent star witness.

On Saturday, the Washington Post reported on some of the steps a CIA analyst took to report his concerns that in a July 25 phone call, the president urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to start an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden.

“The analyst had served on the National Security Council during the Trump administration and had been in the presence of the president. After returning to the CIA, his job required him to continue to participate in National Security Council meetings,” the Post reported.

The paper also noted that this faux “whistleblower” had even attended meeting in the White House in August.

The Post also reported that the “whistleblower,” Eric Ciaramella, did not tell any of his CIA colleagues of his plans to attack the president as he worked on the lan in his CIA cubicle after hours.

But before filing the complaint, this “whistleblower” spoke with a White House official who said he was concerned over Trump’s conversation with Zelensky, too. The paper wrote that the “shaken” official said the call was “frightening,” “crazy,” and “completely lacking in substance related to national security.”

The Post said that the White House official the “whistleblower” spoke to was Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman.

“The analyst does not identify the official in his July 26 memo, which was obtained by congressional investigators in the impeachment inquiry. But Vindman, in his testimony, disclosed that he had spoken to officials outside the White House within days of the Trump-Zelensky call,” the paper reported.

Some felt Vindman was problematic. For one, Timothy Morrison, a former deputy assistant to the president and the National Security Council’s former senior director for Europe and Russia, testified that he had “concerns” about Vindman’s “judgment.”

And well before the “whistleblower’s” claims, others also said that they felt that Vindman should have been fired from his role in the White House.

In the end, the Post’s report seems to show that Vindman and Ciaramella carried out a coordinated attack on President Trump that was carefully planned for months.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on

Continue Reading


Al Sharpton Gets $1M In Pay From His Own Charity

The million-dollar minister.



Al Sharpton Gets $1M In Pay From His Own Charity

Tax filings show Al Sharpton was paid more than $1 million by his own charity in 2018 but he says he’s worth it because he “works six days a week.”

Al’s the million-dollar minister. He defended his hefty paycheck, claiming CEOs at other non-profit organizations make similar amounts of money.

Fox News:

The Harlem-based nonprofit — which Sharpton controls as president and CEO — said the extra cash was to make up for the years from 2004 to 2017 when he didn’t get his full pay.

NAN said it hired an executive compensation firm that determined the good reverend was owed $1.252 million — but he was generously willing to take $500,000 less.

Sharpton and the nonprofit’s board also agreed “he has now been fully compensated for all the years he was underpaid and received no bonus,” the NAN statement said.

The sharp-dressing, silver-tongued preacher defended the windfall before taking the stage for his weekly rally at NAN’s House of Justice in Harlem, an event where attendees throw cash in the collection bucket at the reverend’s behest.

“Fifteen years, you are talking about since 2004 when I came back after running for president,” he said. “For anybody else it would be laughable.”

He said he also deserved the 2018 raise.

“It’s a six-day-a-week job and several hours a day and when [the compensation firm] compared it to other companies, other nonprofits, that’s the salary that they would get,” he said. More

Just your typical Democrat doing what they do best. Biden, Hillary, Sharpton they are all the same. And yet they attack President Trump that works for free and gets results that are practically unheard of.

Twitter weighs in:
Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Pin It on Pinterest