Connect with us

Transgenderism

Cancel Culture Tries to End Career of Comedian Joe Rogan After He Endorses Bernie Sanders

Leftists did their best, last week, to cancel the career of comedian and MMA commentator Joe Rogan after he endorsed Bernie Sanders.

Published

on

Leftists did their best, last week, to cancel the career of comedian and MMA commentator Joe Rogan after he endorsed Bernie Sanders for president on his web broadcast.

Rogan runs an expletive-laden comedy/interview show on the Internet where his no-holds-barred, often profane, and wildly non-PC style delights fans and rankles leftist critics.

He has a history of making jokes that liberals hate, so when Rogan decided to endorse Bernie Sanders for 2020, liberals went into overdrive to make sure Sanders was distanced from Rogan and also to get Rogan thrown off his show, Daily Wire reported.

Saying the candidate has been “insanely consistent his entire life,” Rogan said he now supports Sanders.

Trending: China Now Says Virulent Coronavirus Started Earlier, Hit Two Areas at Once

“Him as a human being, when I was hanging out with him, I believe in him, I like him, I like him a lot,” Rogan told New York Times columnist Bari Weiss on his podcast Thursday. “Look, you could dig up dirt on every single human being that’s ever existed if you catch them in their worst moment and you magnify those moments and you cut out everything else and you only display those moments.”

“That said, you can’t find very many with Bernie,” he continued. “He’s been insanely consistent his entire life. He’s basically been saying the same thing his whole life. And that in and of itself is very a powerful structure to operate from.”

With the endorsement in the air, the Sanders campaign was happy to advertise Rogan’s support.

The campaign put out a video of Rogan on the campaign Twitter account:

But it was not long before the tranny-supporting left went wild in condemnation of Sanders because Rogan has made jokes about transgenderism in the past.

For instance, leftist Mikey Franklin attacked Sanders saying, “Joe Rogan is a transphobic bigot who shills for quackery and cuddles up to dangerous racists. Appearing on his show is bad but understandable. Publicizing his endorsement is indefensible.”

Another, Gaia Project CEO Elizabeth McLaughlin, also went on the attack saying, “Listen to me now, and I can’t believe I have to say it: No Dem needs Joe Rogan’s base to defeat Trump. We also don’t need to capitulate to homophobia and transphobia (which btw *kills* people *smacks forehead*) for any reason. This is foul, justifying stuff. No way around it.”

And Twitter was full of cancel culture leftists trying to destroy Rogan.

Once again, we see the intolerant let doing its best to destroy people they don’t like. Even if that target is ostensibly on their side otherwise.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston. And be sure and check out our great products at RepublicanLegion.com.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement

Transgenderism

Here We Go Again: Democrats Want to add ‘Third Gender’ on U.S. Passports

House Democrats now want to add a third gender option on all U.S. Passports.

Published

on

In yet another sop to the mental illness that is transgenderism and the radical LGBTQ agenda, House Democrats now want to add a third gender option on all U.S. Passports.

California Democrat (naturally) Rep. Ro Khanna recently introduced the “Gender Inclusive Passport Act” that would add a gender-neutral option “in a passport, passport card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad, and for other purposes,” he said in a press release.

“Respecting every American’s gender must extend to travel abroad,” Khanna continued. “The freedom to move and express yourself no matter what should be guaranteed in this country. … Everyone in this country should have the freedom to express their preferred gender on passports.”

“This would basically say that self-affirmation is sufficient,” Khanna said. “It’s bringing the United States passport into the 21st century.”

As leftists are wont to do, Khanna pointed to foreign countries to “prove’ why we must bend to the will of the mental illness that is transgenderism.

“At least 10 countries, including Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, Germany, India, and New Zealand already issue passports with three gender options. Additionally, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a United Nations agency that establishes international travel document standards, already recognizes “(M) Male”, “(F) Female”, and “(X) Unspecified” as valid and machine-readable identifiers,” he wrote.

Ah, yes. It’s the “but other nations do it, so….” defense.

Currently, the U.S. Department of State only allows applicants to chose from the male or female gender categories. None of the 127 other sexes that liberals claim exist are a legal choice on U.S. passports.

Naturally, a trans person has already filed a nuisance lawsuit against the federal government over it lack of wokeness. This lawsuit spurred Rep, Khanna to introduce the legislation.

A handful of states have already bowed to this madness on state-issued birth certificates. Fifteen states and the District of Columbia provide a non-binary choice for people looking to turn a blind eye to science.

“This allows gender-diverse Americans to make the best decision for themselves and their safety when traveling,” Khanna blathered in his statement.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Transgenderism

Leftist Court Forces Professor to Use Transgender Pronouns in Class

A leftist court in Ohio has ruled that a college professor must use fake transgender pronouns in the classroom.

Published

on

A leftist court in Ohio has ruled that a college professor must use fake transgender pronouns in the classroom despite his religious objections.

A Shawnee State University professor of religion and philosophy, Nicholas Meriwether, filed a federal lawsuit last November saying that he has religious objections to calling people by false pronouns, Newsweek reported.

In his suit, he said that he always treats students with respect by calling them “sir,” “miss,” “mister,” or “ma’am.”

The prof claimed that his university was attempting to force him to use the fake pronouns demanded by radical transgender activists.

Meriwether said that a male student demanded that he be addressed with “female gender words.” But the prof would not do it. He added that the student became combative and loudly demanded that he conform to the transgenderism.

The student also filed a formal complaint.

Meriwether refused to comply saying that his religion forbids it.

“I am a Christian. As such, it is my sincerely held religious belief, based on the Bible’s teachings, that God created human beings as either male or female, that this gender is fixed in each person from the moment of conception, and that it cannot be changed,” Meriwether told the school.

The school countered that the prof’s rights as a public employee did not trump the rights of the student to be comfortable in class, and the school demanded that the prof conform to the student’s demands.

Now the court has sided with the school and has ruled that the prof must bend to the wishes of the transgender lobby.

Per The Federalist:

The court said the professor could have used only the last name of all students without reference to sex and chose not to. The court concluded Meriwether was not forced to espouse or express a view he disagreed with or found objectionable, determining that the use of pronouns or titles is not the expression of a belief.

The court rejected the professor’s religious objections, saying the reasonable-person standard would not consider using preferred pronouns as unreasonable and that the anti-discrimination policy is “neutral” and therefore not specifically affecting any religious group or belief. Most shockingly, the court upheld the university’s position that it could not accommodate the professor due to his religious objection, as it would then be required to make similar accommodations for racist or sexist views as well.

Strangely, the court determined Meriwether faced no form of discrimination for his religious beliefs after his superior openly laughed at his concerns during their meeting and compared his views to those of racists. Meriwether also could not prove other faculty who opposed gender identity accommodations had been treated differently than he had been. Essentially, because the university would have disciplined all faculty refusing to use preferred pronouns equally, the court decided no discrimination was present.

Essentially, the court has ruled that Christianity is harassment.

And such a determination could not be more un American.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Transgenderism

Nine States Moving to Ban Transgenderism’s Dangerous ‘Transition’ Agenda

Lawmakers in nine states are working to turn back transgenderism’s dangerous campaign to normalize the “transition” of children.

Published

on

Lawmakers in nine states are working to turn back transgenderism’s dangerous campaign to normalize the “transition” of children using drugs and surgery.

Some of the bills in these states would make it a crime to give pre-teen children the dangerous drugs that interrupt puberty so that they can “transition” from their birth gender to their fantasy gender. Some of the bills similarly ban surgery for the purpose.

As Daily Signal reports:

In South Dakota, state Rep. Fred Deutsch, a Republican, spearheaded the effort. The South Dakota Legislature passed its version of the bill just this month.

If Gov. Kristi Noem, a Republican, signs the bill into law, doctors who offer medical transitions in the form of hormone replacements or surgery to children under 16 could receive a one-year jail sentence or a hefty fine.

Colorado, West Virginia, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Missouri, Florida, Illinois, and Kentucky all have similar provisions in the works, although the details vary.

Rep. Deutsch tweeted that, “The world is upside-down that protecting children from sterilization and mutilation is causing a firestorm.”

“Every child in South Dakota should be protected from dangerous drugs and procedures,” the lawmaker told USA Today. The solution for children’s identification with the opposite sex isn’t to poison their bodies with mega-doses of the wrong hormones, to chemically or surgically castrate and sterilize them, or to remove healthy breasts and reproductive organs.”

Daily Signal added that there is enough anecdotal medical evidence to support both sides of the child transitioning debate:

Sex reassignment surgery—a phrase the LGBTQ lobby hijacked and changed to “gender reassignment surgery,” a subtle but important difference—has had enough success and failure for lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle to use to their advantage.

Sadly, the dangerous transgender movement has taken the lead on the issue and has gotten the jump opponents of destroying the lives of children with the transgender agenda.

Hopefully these bills will all pass and put an end to the dangerous medical malpractice against America’s children.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Transgenderism

Three Girls File Lawsuit Against Connecticut for Transgender Athlete Policy

Three girls have filed a lawsuit against the state of Connecticut for allowing biological boys to compete as girls.

Published

on

Three girls have filed a lawsuit against the state of Connecticut for allowing biological boys to compete as girls and thereby robbing real girls of sports scholarships and other educational opportunities.

Natural-born female students Selina Soule, Chelsea Mitchell, and Alanna Smith say they have lost “honors and opportunities” after losing track and field titles to students born as boys but claiming to be transgender girls who were allowed to compete as girls in school sports, the Washington Times reported.

The former high school girls are represented by the conservative Alliance Defending Freedom, which argued that the policy violates Title IX, “a federal law designed to create opportunities for women in education and athletics” and reverses “nearly 50 years of advances for women.”

“Girls deserve to compete on a level playing field,” ADF legal counsel Christiana Holcomb said. “Forcing them to compete against boys isn’t fair, shatters their dreams, and destroys their athletic opportunities. Having separate boys’ and girls’ sports has always been based on biological differences, not what people believe about their gender, because those differences matter for fair competition.”

The left-wing American Civil Liberties Union attacked the lawsuit claiming it is a strike against “science.”

Because … transgenderism is based on “science”? Riiiight.

Lending credence to the girl’s lawsuit, the two transgender “girls” the state allowed to compete among biological girls took an amazing 15 state titles away from those biological girls.

The lawsuit, which names the CIAC as well as various school boards, argued that male athletes achieve records 10-20% higher than comparable female athletes, thanks to “basic physiological differences,” including larger lungs, hearts, bones; increased muscle mass; stronger bones; higher myoglobin concentration; longer bones, and a five-inch on average height advantage.

At the same time, female athletes undergo changes after puberty that often impedes athletic performance, including increased body fat, wider hips, and decreased hip rotation.

“Each year, thousands of men—and dozens or hundreds of high school boys under the age of 18—achieve times (or heights or distances) in track events better than the world’s single best elite woman competitor that year,” said the lawsuit.

Science.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Transgenderism

Left-Wing Medical Journal Claims Parents Who Won’t Allow Transgender Treatments are Child Abusers

A prominent medical journal says it is child abuse when parents won’t allow pre-teen children to undergo transgender sex changing treatments.

Published

on

A prominent medical journal is now saying it is child abuse when parents won’t allow their pre-teen children to undergo transgender sex changing treatments.

According to a paper discussed in the recent issue of Journal of Medical Ethics, parents are attacked if they disagree with transgenderism. The article slams parents who disagree with dangerous experimental transgender drugs and add that the government should remove children from families that disagree with transgenderism.

According to the summary of the piece, the paper focuses on “how to proceed if a minor and their parents have disagreements concerning their gender-affirming medical care.” After studying “ethical, pediatric, adolescent and transgender health research,” the authors “discuss three potential avenues for providing gender-affirming care over parental disagreement: legal carve-outs to parental consent, the mature minor doctrine and state intervention for neglect.”

There’s more, PJ Media noted:

The authors — professors and plastic surgeons in New York, Michigan, and Washington State — approach “this parent-child disagreement in a manner that prioritizes the developing autonomy of transgender youth in the decision-making process surrounding medically assisted gender affirmation.” In other words, the authors assume that if a child consistently insists that he or she is “really” a she or he, medical professionals should encourage that child to take experimental transgender drugs and be put on a path to surgery, even if the parents want to protect their child from taking this dangerous path.

The experimental drugs are “gender-affirming,” so the child’s “autonomy” outweighs the parents’ rights, even though the child is not legally considered old enough to vote or drink alcohol or be considered responsible for himself or herself.

So, that means the authors are claiming that parents are guilty of neglect if they won’t push their kids into dangerous transgender treatments.

“Neglect, as a medico-legal term, can be used to initiate an evaluation by Child Protective Services and remove a parent as a child’s legal guardian in the most severe instances,” the authors write in the full report. Citing pro-transgender literature, the authors claim that experimental medicine lowers depression and other high-risk behaviors among gender-confused young people.

“We conclude that situations where a parent prevents a minor from receiving treatments related to gender dysphoria violate the Harm Principle and justify state intervention,” the authors exclaim.

There is a lot more about this at PJMedia but imagine what this all means.

It is bad enough that some dangerous left-wing doctors think these things. But even worse, a respected medical journal sees nothing at all wrong with the ACTUAL child abuse of forcing prepubescent children being treated with untested, dangerous experimental drugs to change their gender!

We are quickly getting to a point where we simply cannot trust the medical establishment because they are pushing left-wing politics above medicine, science, and patient safety.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Transgenderism

Illinois OKays Women Claiming to Be Men to be Listed as ‘Father’ on Child’s Birth Certificates

The State of Illinois is now allowing women who claim to be transgender men to be listed as a “father” on a child’s birth certificate.

Published

on

The left-wing State of Illinois is now allowing women who claim to be transgender men to list themselves as a “father” on a child’s birth certificate.

The decision was anounced this month after a biological woman who claims to be a man demanded that she be listed as the “father” of the baby to which she gave birth.

Illinois officials originally ruled that the transgender man, Myles Brady Davis, would be listed as the mother because Myles was the one who carried the baby.

Naturally, because the mentally confused woman “identifies” as a man, she threatened to take the state to court to force the Land of Lincoln to list her as the “father” of her own baby.

Unsurprisingly, officials in the deep blue state immediately caved in to the absurd demands.

“I feel so relieved,” Myles told the Chicago Tribune. “I’d gone through two years of (in vitro fertilization) and nine months of a very difficult pregnancy just to be misgendered at the end. It was really breaking my heart.”

Precious and Myles, the communications director for Equality Illinois, reported the problem to his employer and reached out to the LGBTQ rights group Lambda Legal, which sent the state an advocacy letter, explaining the need for an accurate birth certificate. It was the first time the state had been informed of a transgender live birth, and officials agreed that the Brady Davises should not be misgendered on the birth certificate, according to Illinois Department of Public Health spokesperson Melaney Arnold.

Two weeks after their healthy baby girl, Zayn, was born in early December, the Brady Davises learned that they would get the birth certificate they wanted — with Myles listed as the father and Precious as the mother. Arnold said via email that the birth certificate will be a first for Illinois, and the state is working to make accurate gender identification a permanent option easily available to all transgender parents.

“It also just removes the choice to decide when or how to disclose their transgender status,” Lambda Legal staff attorney Kara Ingelhart said. “That’s private medical and personal information that they should have control over.”

You have to feel sorry for this poor baby, being brought into this insane household where her mother will tell her she is her father.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Transgenderism

Whiny Transgender Brutally Mocked by Ricky Gervais Swears to Destroy Comedian’s Career

A man who claims to be a woman has sworn to destroy the career of comedian Ricky Gervais after the funnyman mocked the trans person.

Published

on

A Canadian man who claims to be a woman has sworn to destroy the career of comedian Ricky Gervais after the British funnyman brutally mocked the trans person.

Gervais mocked a transgender activist with male genitalia going by the name Jessica Yaniv who recently complained of being turned away by a gynecologist. Gervais thought it was hilarious that a man pretending to be a woman got turned away by a doctor who only deals with female genitalia.

“It’s disgusting that a qualified gynaecologist can refuse to check a lady’s cock for ovarian cancer. What if her bollocks are pregnant? She could lose the baby. I’m outraged,” Gervais joked on Twitter.

The activist who has spent years looking for people to sue so “she” could be “accepted” then took out after Gervais.

On his own Twitter account, Yaniv told Gervais “I’m not allowing this” and added a link to a story that Gervais had scheduled a comedy concert in Vancouver, Canada.

Yaniv is now threatening to launch a boycott of the Gervais comedy show and is also threatening to get the Canadian government to employ its anti-free speech codes to shut Gervais down.

The trans activist recently made news for attacking a salon run by immigrant women of the Sikh faith for refusing to wax his genitals.

Jessica Yaniv filed his lawsuit in Canada claiming violations of the leftist country’s human rights codes when the woman working for a salon refused to remove the hair on his genitals with the procedure known as waxing.

Yaniv lost his case.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider


Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend