Connect with us


BIAS MUCH? Twitter and Facebook Censor Trump 65 Times, Never Censor Biden Even Once

Proving their bias, Facebook and Twitter have censored Donald Trump and his campaign 65 times while never once censoring Joe Biden and his crew.



Proving their bias, Facebook and Twitter have censored Donald Trump and his campaign 65 times while never once censoring Joe Biden and his crew.

The data was assembled by the Media Research Center:

Twitter composes the bulk of the problem, with 98 percent of all the instances of censorship. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Twitter has made the decision to censor major headlines about the Biden family, particularly when it came to the New York Post’s story about Hunter Biden’s dealings with Ukraine.

The Media Research Center’s Techwatch department analyzed two years of social media posts from Trump, Biden, and their respective campaigns. The analysis did not include any ads from PACs or super PACs that had made ads in favor of either candidate. It also focused on social media posts, not paid advertisements, from the campaigns. These numbers were collected from between May 2018 to October 16, 2020.

Trending: Fox News Ratings Crash Continues, Once Led in Every Time Slot, Now Only Tucker Winning Ratings Game

The MRC also noted that employees from the two social media giants have donated nearly 100 percent of their political money to the Democrats.

Even jokes and memes are censored:

Memes apparently are not allowed on the president’s account either. A meme showing Trump saying “in reality, they’re not after me. They’re after you” was removed from his June 30 tweet. Meme videos and meme creators who make pro-Trump content have suffered at the hands of Twitter. One instance is Carpe Donktum, the meme creator who made a video mocking the Democrats’ reaction to the 2019 State of the Union address. The video, retweeted by Trump, was removed after a copyright complaint. Donktum, whose real name is Logan Cook, was also removed in June 2020 after Trump had tweeted another one of his videos showing two toddlers hugging each other, with fake CNN chyrons at the bottom.

This censorship goes back as far as the beginning of the Trump presidency. A rogue Twitter employee in 2017 deactivated Trump’s account on his last day at work, leaving it offline for 11 minutes. Trump’s two tweets of Drudge headlines in 2018 were given the “sensitive content” filter over top of the tweets.

Meanwhile, neither social media outlet has censored anything put out by Biden and the Democrats.

If this isn’t bias, what is it?

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Facebook Helps Antifa Terror Group Plan Attack on White House, Allows Page While Deleting Conservatives

Facebook continues to allow an Antifa terror group that is openly calling for violence against the White House even as they destroy conservative pages.



Facebook continues to allow an Antifa terror group that is openly calling for violence against the White House to keep its page up even as they commit mass deletions of conservative pages and groups.

The terror group has stated a Facebook group called “White House Siege” which plans to besiege the White House with violent mobs in September.

“In September 17, 2020, we will lay siege to the White House. And we will sustain it for exactly fifty days. This is the #WhiteHouseSiege,” the terror outfit says on its Facebook page.

The group claims the coming violence will bring about a New World Order, the main desire of all leftists that want the United States and its Constitution destroyed.

“#WhiteHouseSiege will electrify the U.S. election season — and it doesn’t stop there. Drawing wind from #MeToo, #BLM, #ExtinctionRebellion, and protests against Trump’s lethal bungling of coronavirus, we’ll inspire a global movement of systemic change — a Global Spring — a cultural heave towards a new world order,” the domestic terror group added.

The group noted that leftists need a new “Occupy Wall Street” type of movement to continue the destruction of America. If you’ll recall, OWS was a violent movement that left millions in property damage, not to mention rapes, and murders in its wake before it finally imploded and went away.

“The Occupy anniversary arrives September 17th, 2020. And it may be the perfect day to trigger another global big-bang moment — a massive collective action of the sweetest kind of disobedience,” the group wrote.

“A siege only works if it is sustained. We witnessed this — the multiplying power of a strategic occupation — nine years ago. You dig in, hold your ground, and the tension accumulates, amplifies, goes global,” they said.

And yet, Facebook leaves their account up and running even as they target and destroy thousands of conservative or pro-Trump sites.

A group openly calling for violence and destructive revolution is OK as far as Facebook is concerned.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading


Facebook/Google/Twitter/Youtube Censor Viral Video of Medical Doctor’s Coronavirus Press Conference

All the big left-wing social media platforms deleted the viral video of a press conference in D.C. held by America’s Frontline Doctors.



All the big left-wing social media platforms deleted the viral video of a press conference in D.C. held by America’s Frontline Doctors who advocate for use of hydroxychloroquine.

The video of the press conference, organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots, had been viewed more than 17 million times before Facebook deleted and banned the video.

Facebook was first to act, but Google-owned YouTube and Twitter also censored the footage of the press conference.

Breitbart News posted a screenshot of just how successful the video had been:

“In terms of viral velocity, the post was beating content from many other prominent accounts on Facebook today, including Hillary Clinton, Rev. Franklin Graham, and Kim Kardashian,” Breitbart added.

The event, hosted by the organization America’s Frontline Doctors, a group founded by Dr. Simone Gold, a board-certified physician and attorney, and made up of medical doctors, came together to address what the group calls a “massive disinformation campaign” about the coronavirus. Norman also spoke at the event.

“If Americans continue to let so-called experts and media personalities make their decisions, the great American experiment of a Constitutional Republic with Representative Democracy, will cease,” reads the event’s information page.

The event was organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots.

“We’ve removed this video for sharing false information about cures and treatments for COVID-19,” a Facebook company spokesman, Andy Stone, told Breitbart News. The company did not specify what portion of the video it ruled to be “false information,” who it consulted to make that ruling, and on what basis it was made.

It wasn’t long before Twitter also suspended the Breitbart News account for sharing the video.

This is 100% left-wing censorship aimed at taking out anything that bucks the liberal line of lies about the coronavirus.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading


Facebook Refuses to Punish Dem. Campaign Group that Posts Fake ‘News Stories’ as Real News

Facebook is treating a Democrat campaign group as a “news organization,” and allows it to post campaign propaganda as “news.”



Facebook continues to treat a Democrat campaign organization as a “news organization,” and allows the group to post campaign propaganda as “news stories,” Politico found.

Remember, it is Facebook that bans your posts claiming you post fake news,” and has a board of left-wing “fact checkers” making sure conservatives are not allowed to post things.

And yet, here is Facebook treating a Democrat campaign group as if it is a “journalistic organization” and allows the group to post its fake news as if it is legitimate journalism when all they really do is dress up their campaign press releases as “news stories.”

Politico recently reported that Facebook treats a Democrat PAC organization called as if it is a news organization instead of the candidate campaign propaganda shop that it actually is.

Check this out:

The articles and Facebook ad dollars look like the efforts of a run-of-the-mill political group. But they are actually from a news outlet:, also known as Courier, which was created and funded by the Democratic-aligned digital organization Acronym. Courier has spent over $1.4 million on Facebook ads this election cycle, mostly to promote its flattering articles and videos about more than a dozen endangered House Democrats at the top of the Democratic Party’s priority list this November, according to Facebook’s political ad tracker.

But because Courier is organized as a media outlet, it does not have to disclose its donors or the total money it spends promoting Democratic politicians.

The $1.4 million in Facebook ads is likely just a fraction of the money behind the Courier project, which includes a newsroom of at least 25 people and eight separate websites with content often focused on local issues in presidential swing states. But this activity — creating an unregulated advertising stream promoting Democratic officeholders, more akin to a PAC than a newsroom — diverges from other partisan news outlets that are proliferating online as local newspapers struggle.

The key here is that Facebook continues to allow this group to publish is campaign propaganda as “news stories.”

Facebook does not “fact check” them, limit them, or put disclaimers on them.

Facebook allows this group to continue to masquerade as a “news outlet” to post their campaign propaganda as if it is an act of journalism.

Yet, every conservative we all know is handed multiple bans, has their posts “fact checked,” and is continually oppressed by Facebook.

This is the quiet oppression that conservatives face on Facebook every day.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading


Facebook Bans Trump Re-Election Campaign Ad That Denounces Antifa Violence

Facebook has banned Trumps’ latest re-election campaign ad that denounces violence by the group Antifa because Facebook says it promotes violence!



Facebook has banned Trumps’ latest re-election campaign ad that denounces violence by the group Antifa… because Facebook says it promotes violence!

You read that right. In true Orwellian fashion, Facebook has decided that an ad that denounces violence actually promotes it?

Why? Because the ad denounces the domestic terror group that Facebook supports, that’s why.

The Trump ad denounced Antifa, the decentralized movement of far-left agitators known for acts of domestic terrorism and political violence.

The reason that fake Facebook used to ban the ad was that the campaign used one of Antifa’s common symbols, a red triangle pointed downward.

Here is a screen shot of the ad:

The left-wing hate site Media Matters claimed that the ad was proof that Trump is a Nazi because Nazis have used the inverted red triangle in the past.

Facebook bought the lie sold by the hate site and then banned the Trump ad on that fake news basis.

But in a comment to the New York Daily News, the Trump campaign pointed out the symbol’s links to Antifa.

“The red triangle is an Antifa symbol,” said Trump campaign spokesman Ken Farnaso who linked to the symbol being used in Antifa-branded products.

In a comment to Breitbart News, Trump Campaign Director of Communications Tim Murtaugh said: “The inverted red triangle is a symbol used by Antifa, so it was included in an ad about Antifa. We would note that Facebook still has an inverted red triangle emoji in use, which looks exactly the same, so it’s curious that they would target only this ad. The image is also not included in the Anti-Defamation League’s database of symbols of hate. But it is ironic that it took a Trump ad to force the media to implicitly concede that Antifa is a hate group.”

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading


Facebook Insists Page Celebrating Dead Cops Doesn’t Violate Facebook Rules

Facebook is refusing to delete a page dedicated to celebrating the deaths of police officers because the page doesn’t violate their “community standards.”



Facebook is refusing to delete a page dedicated to celebrating the deaths of police officers because, the social media giant says, the hateful page doesn’t violate their “community standards.”

The social media monopoly is refusing to take down the page named “The Only Good Cops Are Dead Cops,” a site that openly incites violence against police officers.

Facebook was alerted to the page, but later claimed that its moderators didn’t think it violated its standards.

Paul Joseph Watson noted that Facebook sent the person complaining about the site a message telling them that a page that calls for the murder of police officers was perfectly fine to Facebook’s bosses. The person received this message:

Watson went on to report about another page that Facebook DID have a problem with:

Meanwhile, another Facebook page set up by concerned parents that was critical of ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ was banned by the social media giant.

500 Mom Strong was removed for “transphobic language,” including one post that merely stated, “Reminder: Women don’t have to be polite to someone who is making them uncomfortable.”

However, half a dozen other 500 Mom Strong parody pages set up by LGBT activists were left untouched.

“When I asked them about the half dozen other fake 500 Mom Strong pages that were put up by drag queens [and] used to parody 500 Mom Strong, I received no answer and the pages are still active,” said founder Anna Hall Bohach.

“There is also a fake profile, created by drag queens, using my name and information that has been reported multiple times by my friends and me that Facebook refuses to remove. I asked the Facebook representative about it and I still have yet to receive an answer,” she added.

So, let’s review: Facebook has no problem with a page that incites murder against cops, but is 100 percent against a page that worries that dangerous sexual predators are being brought into the schools and libraries to read to little children.

Are we seeing the horror that is leftism yet, folks?

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading


Facebook Hires Professor Who Attacked Barron Trump for New Censorship Board

Facebook has elevated to its new censorship board a virulent left-wing professor who attacked Donald Trump’s young son, Barron.



Facebook has elevated to its new censorship board a virulent left-wing professor who attacked Donald Trump’s young son, Barron.

That’s right, a hardcore leftist who attacked a little boy for political reasons has been put in a position of telling YOU what you are allowed to post on Facebook.

We reported here last week that Facebook announced its first slate of 20 leftists — most of whom are foreigners — who will be tasked with reviewing Facebook posts to determine if social media users should be allowed to post anything.

While the largest number of these censors are foreign leftists, many are homegrown leftists and some have noted that one of them is a hate-filled, left-wing, professor from Stanford Law School named Pamela Karlan.

According to CNBC, that the board will make “final decisions about what’s allowed on the platform.”

With all these extreme leftists on the new board, we’ll give you three guesses which ideological side of the aisle will find posts censored even more than they are already… and, as they say, the first two guesses don’t count.

So, just how unbiased with this Karlan character be?

Not unbiased at all.

Karlan made news during the Democrat’s fake impeachment show trials when she attacked 13-year-old Baron Trump on video and in front of a congressional committee.

Look at this video that Trump’s War Room tweeted out last year:

This is the unhinged, hateful, leftist that will be telling you what you are allowed to post on Facebook.

Conservatives won’t be oppressed even more, huh?

No, not at all.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading


REVEALED: The 20 Foreign Left-Wingers Facebook Hired to Determine What You are Allowed to Post

Facebook revealed the names of the 20 foreign left-wing activists it has hired to determine what you will be allowed to post.



Facebook revealed on Wednesday the names of the 20 left-wing, mostly foreign activists it has hired to determine what you will be allowed to post on the platform.

The social media giant revealed the names of the people who will sit on its new “Oversight Board.” And it turns out that a large number of the people on the board are members of the UN, the European Union, leftist professors, and far, far left activist groups, CNBC reported.

What a surprise, huh? The people Facebook picked to censor Americans are a bunch of extremist, left-wing, foreigners!

It will truly be the end of freedom of speech on Facebook once these extremists get started.


The oversight board will govern appeals from Facebook and Instagram users and questions from Facebook itself, although it admitted it will have to pick and choose which content moderation cases to take due to the sheer volume of them.

The board will receive cases through a content management system that is linked to Facebook’s own platforms. They will then discuss the case as a group before issuing a final decision on whether the content should be allowed to stay up or not.

CNBC added:

The members are a globally diverse group with lawyers, journalists, human rights advocates and other academics. Between them, they are said to have expertise in areas such as digital rights, religious freedom, conflicts between rights, content moderation, internet censorship and civil rights.

Notable members include Alan Rusbridger, former editor in chief of The Guardian newspaper, and Andras Sajo, a former judge and VP of the European Court of Human Rights.

Helle Thorning-Schmidt, a former Prime Minister of Denmark, is one of the board’s four co-chairs. “Up until now some of the most difficult decisions about content have been made by Facebook and you could say Mark Zuckerberg,” she said on a call with the press Wednesday. “Facebook has decided to change that.”

Here is the full list of the biased activists Facebook has hired to decide if you should be allowed to speak on Facebook. And you’ll notice that every one of them are leftists and many are foreigners:

  • Afia Asantewaa Asare-Kyei, human rights advocate at the Open Society Initiative for West Africa
  • Evelyn Aswad, University of Oklahoma College of Law professor who formerly served as a senior U.S. State Department lawyer
  • Endy Bayuni, journalist who twice served as the editor-in-chief of the Jakarta Post
  • Catalina Botero-Marino, Facebook Oversight Board co-chair, dean of the Universidad de los Andes Faculty of Law
  • Katherine Chen, communications scholar at the National Chengchi University and former national communications regulator in Taiwan
  • Nighat Dad, digital rights advocate who received the Human Rights Tulip Award
  • Jamal Greene, Facebook Oversight Board co-chair, Columbia Law professor
  • Pamela Karlan, Stanford Law professor and United States Supreme Court advocate
  • Tawakkol Karman, Nobel Peace Prize laureate named as one of “History’s Most Rebellious Women” by Time
  • Maina Kiai, director of Human Rights Watch’s Global Alliances and Partnerships program
  • Sudhir Krishnaswamy, vice chancellor of the National Law School of India University
  • Ronaldo Lemos, technology, intellectual property and media lawyer who teaches law at Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Michael McConnell, Facebook Oversight Board co-chair, Stanford Law professor who previously served as a federal circuit judge
  • Julie Owono, digital rights and anti-censorship advocate who leads Internet Sans Frontieres
  • Emi Palmor, former director general of the Israeli Ministry of Justice
  • Alan Rusbridger, former editor-in-chief of The Guardian
  • Andras Sajo, former judge and vice president of the European Court of Human Rights
  • John Samples, helps lead a libertarian think tank and writes extensively on social media and speech regulation
  • Nicolas Suzor, Queensland University of Technology Law School professor
  • Helle Thorning-Schmidt, Facebook Oversight Board co-chair, former Prime Minister of Denmark

So much for the true red, white, and blue American ideal of free speech!

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at:

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
Send this to a friend