Connect with us


Attorney for John Bolton Argues That McGahn Ruling Doesn’t Extend to His Client

There goes all of last night’s mainstream talking points…



Tuning in to the mainstream media matrix last night, you would have gotten the impression that the Democrats would soon be dragging anyone and everyone they wished into this impeachment mess.

That position came after a scratching ruling by an Obama-appointed judge stating that former White House Counsel Don McGahn was not subject to the “immunity” that the White House was claiming.  The position itself read like a bit of “resistance” rhetoric, stating dramatically that “presidents are not kings”, as if that needed some reiteration in the land of the free.

On CNN and elsewhere, progressive pundits were taking a victory lap, claiming that this would then open the door for any number of previously unavailable witnesses to testify.

An attorney for John Bolton says that this is not the case.

John Bolton’s attorney suggested Tuesday that a court order directing former White House counsel Don McGahn to appear before Congress has no bearing on whether his client and another ex-national security official he represents will testify.

The statement from attorney Charles Cooper aimed to blunt public speculation that the judge’s order in the McGahn case could influence the actions of his own clients or halt a lawsuit from one of them challenging a subpoena in the House impeachment inquiry.

Cooper’s comments followed a judge’s ruling in a separate case Monday requiring McGahn to comply with a subpoena related to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. The judge, Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote that not even the Republican president’s closest aides who receive subpoenas from Congress can “ignore or defy congressional compulsory process, by order of the President or otherwise.”

Cooper said Tuesday that former deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman would continue to pursue his lawsuit in Washington’s federal court. That lawsuit asks a judge to decide whether he must comply with a congressional subpoena in the House impeachment inquiry or abide by White House instructions that he not appear. The order for McGahn does not affect Kupperman’s case since Kupperman’s advice to the president exclusively concerns sensitive matters of national security, he said.

Trending: French President Issues Scathing Statement on ‘Stolen’ Footage Meant to Embarrass Trump

This is just the latest wrinkle for the Democrats, who have found themselves suddenly rushing to get their impeachment push off the ground before the December 9th release of a DOJ investigatory report that could put some serious heat on the entire party.

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.



Kellyanne Conway Rips Impeachment Witness: ‘Who The Hell Are You, Lady?’

Given the unspoken alliance between the Democratic Party and the mainstream media, this sort of partisan tomfoolery doesn’t look to be going anywhere anytime soon, either. 



Despite the patent absurdity of it, political discrimination seems to be at an all time high here in the United States, thanks to the mainstream media’s constant need for conflict to drive rantings.

The infotainment industry needs the US population to be divided, and angrily, in order to bring in the beaucoup bucks that their advertisers give them for commercial break real estate.  This means that, every time we engage in pedantic arguments with one another on the basis of politics, we are feeding the machine that aims to drive us apart.

And it’s not just the angry leftists on Facebook who are a problem here, it’s also those who find themselves with a soapbox from which to spout their divisive drivel.

Longtime White House adviser Kellyanne Conway recognizes just what’s at stake here, and is taking one of the Democrats’ impeachment witnesses to task for their attempts to keep us at each others’ throats.

One of the star witnesses for Congressional Democrats in President Trump‘s impeachment inquiry, Professor Pamela Karlan, should be ashamed of herself for showing such arrogance and looking down on half of America, said Kellyanne Conway on “Fox & Friends” Thursday.

Conway accused Democrats of using Trump’s Ukraine phone call as an excuse to boot him from office, before highlighting Karlan’s comments about conservatives, which were read aloud on Wednesday by Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla.

The Stanford law professor was quoted as saying, “Liberals tend to cluster more. Conservatives, especially very conservative people, tend to spread out more, perhaps because they don’t even want to be around themselves.”

Conway was rightfully brutal in her assessment.

“Let’s stop pretending it has a damn thing to do with the 15 witnesses over two committees, the Democrats have called over the last couple of weeks,” Conway told Fox News. “One, out of those 15 witnesses, has said that he or she has ever talked to the president about Ukraine.

Conway accused Karlan of “look[ing] her nose down” at average Americans and blue-collar workers

“She thinks that you are less than her. And I’ve had it… who the hell are you lady, to look down on half the country?”

Given the unspoken alliance between the Democratic Party and the mainstream media, this sort of partisan tomfoolery doesn’t look to be going anywhere anytime soon, either.

Continue Reading


Nancy Pelosi Snaps at Reporter, Scolds Him for Saying She ‘Hates’ the President

Where there was once a calm confidence with Nancy Pelosi, there is now little more than angst-ridden finger wagging and invocations of past patriots whom she has never met.



After years of “resistance” to the very idea of President Donald J. Trump, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is now insisting, in no uncertain terms, that she doesn’t “hate” him.

Yesterday’s impeachment hearings were a bit of a sideshow.  With no fact witnesses present, the entire affair was reduced to little more than an attempt by the left to somehow justify the thin evidence they’ve gathered so far.  By stacking the deck with three Democratically-called witnesses to the Republicans’ single scholar, the hearing appeared to be nothing more than a maneuver meant to convince the nation that they hadn’t been working to impeach the President simply because they wanted to.

That didn’t work, however, with Georgia Rep. Doug Collins openly and loudly demonstrating that the Democrats have been looking to impeach Donald Trump for years, based solely on their disdain for him personally.

When confronted with Collins’ words this morning, Nancy Pelosi lost her cool.

Sinclair reporter James Rosen had asked Pelosi: “Do you hate the president?”

“I don’t hate anybody,” she initially shot back. She wagged her finger and pointed at Rosen, telling him not to accuse her of hating someone. Rosen denied doing so.

Pelosi wasn’t done there.

“As a Catholic, I resent your using the word hate in a sentence that addresses me. I don’t hate anyone. I was raised in a way that is a heart full of love and always pray for the president. And I still pray for the president. And I pray for the president all the time, so don’t mess with me when it comes to words like that,” she said.

President Trump even weighed in on Pelosi’s tantrum.

Where there was once a calm confidence with Nancy Pelosi, there is now little more than angst-ridden finger wagging and invocations of past patriots whom she has never met.

Continue Reading


Pence Pushed to Fire Flynn Say Newly Released Notes from Mueller and FBI

These documents demonstrate a great deal of drama occurring on Pennsylvania Avenue.



President Trump’s arrival in Washington DC will likely serve as an historical marker for future generations.

Trump, in a stunning rebuke of the status quo, was elected President by We The People after promising to “drain the swamp” in Washington DC – a metaphor that has come to encapsulate a very broad and determined attempt to root out political corruption and collusion that, left unchecked, would tips the scales of power away from the people and into the hands of the public servants they’ve selected to serve them.

Of course, this Deep State cabal hasn’t yet been vanquished.  Rather, they are squirming ever more violently, writhing even, under the thumb of a political newcomer who is ready to tear it all down and start from scratch.

This flailing has been readily apparent throughout Trump’s first term, with a number of politicians and political appointees finding themselves at odds with one another, even in the White House itself.

Now, newly released documents from the FBI show that these conflicts went all the way to the top.  In these documents, former Trump campaign aide Rick Gates described infighting between one of the President’s most valuable advisers, General Michael Flynn, and Vice President Mike Pence.

Gates pinned some of the decision to fire national security adviser Michael Flynn on Vice President Mike Pence.

“Gates said Pence went to Trump about firing Flynn and he thought it was one of the few times Pence pushed Trump hard like that,” Mueller’s team wrote in the summary of Gates’ April 2018 cooperation interview.

Investigators also noted that Gates thought Trump and Flynn had had a good relationship, and that Trump didn’t want to fire his national security adviser but “felt like he had no choice” after Flynn lied to Pence about his contact with the Russian ambassador.

General Flynn is currently embroiled in a legal scandal surrounding his conservations with the FBI during their involvement in the Special Counsel investigation by Robert Mueller, in which he and his legal team claim that Flynn was being treated unfairly by the Bureau during his original questioning.


Continue Reading


Rudy Heads to Ukraine to Expose Corruption Being Ignored by Democratic Impeachment Circus

Rudy is finding facts while the House Democrats are simply attempting to shoehorn Trump’s actions into an ever-changing definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors”.



Today’s impeachment hearing has so far accomplished one thing and one thing only:  Exposing the Democrats’ desire to railroad the President’s actions into some malleable definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors”.

Todays’ witnesses are a cadre of Constitutional scholars, three who agree with the “resistance” that Donald Trump has committed such improprieties and should be impeached, and one who dissents from that stance.  The questioning today has been notoriously fact-less, instead focusing on the process itself, and how the Democrats can squeeze Donald Trump into this mold.  The left has already decided that impeachment will move forward, and this is just their attempt at convincing the American people of what they’ve been insinuating all along.

In order to get to the actual bottom of this UkraineGate malarky, President Trump’s personal lawyer is on the ground in Europe, finding facts.

Giuliani met Tuesday with a former Ukrainian prosecutor, Yuriy Lutsenko, in Budapest, The New York Times reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

On Wednesday, Giuliani traveled to Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, hoping to meet with other ex-Ukrainian prosecutors, including Viktor Shokin and Kostiantyn Kulyk, The New York Times reported.

Giuliani reportedly is also helping right-wing news network One America News produce episodes of a documentary series promoting his arguments against Democrats’ impeachment inquiry in the House.

Giuliani has been at the center of the impeachment controversy for some time, having been named by many of the Democrats’ fact witnesses as an integral piece of the UkraineGate puzzle.  President Trump has staunchly defended Rudy, however, indicating that any involvement the former NYC Mayor had with Ukrainian authorities was in the interest of rooting out corruption pursuant to the terms of America’s agreement with Kyiv regarding what it necessary for them to receive American aid money.


Continue Reading


French President Issues Scathing Statement on ‘Stolen’ Footage Meant to Embarrass Trump

Macron was incensed that the videotape was even recorded.



President Trump’s trip to London this week was a strange one, to say the least.  Not only was he away from Washington DC at a time in which the House Judiciary Committee could very well be deciding his political fate, but he found himself a participant in a number of confrontations, both willingly and unwillingly.

The first indication that this wasn’t your ordinary NATO summit came when Trump sat down for a joint public appearance with French President Emmanuel Macron in which the two world leaders seemed at odds, bickering over the reality on the ground as it pertains to the current strengths and weaknesses of the radical Islamic terror group ISIS.

Then, at a reception later in the day, Macron was seen speaking to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who himself was making some uncouth observations regarding President Trump.

Now, Macron is speaking out about the incident, and railing against those who used the footage to embarrass the US President.

FURIOUS French President Emmanuel Macron today hit out a “stolen” clip of him gossiping about Donald Trump.

Macron, 41, was caught on a hot mic chatting about Trump with Canadian PM Justin Trudeau at a Buckingham Palace gala last night.

When asked about the footage, he blasted: “I am not going to comment on stolen videos.

“That video wasn’t supposed to be filmed in that room”.

President Trump had earlier responded to the incident by asserting that Trudeau was “two-faced” and promptly announcing that he will be returning to Washington earlier than originally planned.


Continue Reading


Jonathan Turley Destroys Democrats Claims Of An Impeachable Offense



Jonathan Turley Destroys Dems Claims Of An Impeachable Offense

Rep Andy Biggs tweeted an important video: “In less than 10 minutes, Jonathan Turley destroys the Democrats’ flailing, poll-tested claims that @POTUS @realDonaldTrump committed bribery. This is a must-watch discussion.”

Professor Jonathan Turley is a nationally recognized legal scholar who has written extensively in areas ranging from constitutional law to legal theory to tort law. He has written over three dozen academic articles that have appeared in a variety of leading law journals at Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Harvard, Northwestern, University of Chicago, and other schools.

Twitter jumps in:

Continue Reading


Impeachment Report Hypocrisy: POTUS ‘Undermined National Security’ by Investigating Corruption

After the release of the report, White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham offered her own take on the summary.



House Intel Chair Adam Schiff certainly has it out for President Donald Trump, this much is known, but just what lengths he would go to in order to smear the Commander in Chief in his impeachment report remained a bit of a mystery until today.

Schiff was responsible for the first bit of this latest impeachment debacle, which is now headed to the House Judiciary Committee for further hearings, and the report he has compiled from his piece of the investigation is wildly hyperbolic.

“President Trump’s scheme subverted U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine and undermined our national security in favor of two politically motivated investigations that would help his presidential reelection campaign,” the report said.

It said the inquiry “uncovered a months-long effort by President Trump to use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election.”

The President and the Republican Party have tried in vain to explain to Schiff and Co. that the President’s attempts to root out corruption in Ukraine were well within the bounds of his authority.

After the release of the report, White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham offered her own take on the summary.

White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham swiftly hit back in a statement slamming the nature of the Intelligence Committee’s inquiry and claiming it failed to prove any wrongdoing on Trump’s part.

“At the end of a one-sided sham process, Chairman Schiff and the Democrats utterly failed to produce any evidence of wrongdoing by President Trump,” Grisham said. “This report reflects nothing more than their frustrations. Chairman Schiff’s report reads like the ramblings of a basement blogger straining to prove something when there is evidence of nothing.”

Earlier this week, a statement by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated that he felt no pressure or “quid pro quo” when speaking with President Trump, thoroughly blowing a hole in the entire Democratic narrative.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider

Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend