Connect with us

Culture

A Pleasure to Burn: Social Media’s Virtual Book Burners Sponsor a Cyber Bibliocaust

Published

on

By Paul Dowling
 
“I wrote Fahrenheit 451 not to predict the future, but to prevent it.”  —Ray Bradbury
“Dort, wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man am Ende auch Menschen.”  —Heinrich Heine  [“Wherever they burn books, they will, in the end, also burn human beings.”  —Heinrich Heine]
Zuckerberg’s Pleasure
“It was a pleasure to burn.”  So begins Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_451), his story of firemen who burn down the houses of book owners, thereby destroying entire libraries while punishing those who dare reject society’s propaganda narratives in favor of thinking for themselves.  Bradbury’s cautionary tale has been hailed as a masterpiece; but today, in an age where Facebook and other social media are deleting, blocking, or shadow-banning the accounts of Religious Jews, Evangelical Christians, and Constitutional Conservatives, among others, Bradbury’s dystopia seems more a figurative portrayal of America in 2018, where, instead of burning down houses, Mark Zuckerberg and his band of merry firemen are happily burning down social media accounts instead.
Sadly, America has become a nation where the book-burner mentality holds sway among Democrat censors who are deciding which social media posts and shares to allow or condemn in America’s virtual town square.  Google, the world’s preëminent search engine is—at this writing—even “burning” positive news reports about President Trump, using a search algorithm that generates 96% negative results for the president (https://thepalmierireport.com/censorship-google-search-for-trump-gives-you-96-left-wing-website-results/).  Google is doing this to influence voters in favor of supporting Democrats ahead of the 2018 elections.  And, since most other search engines ride piggyback on Google, the corruption spreads throughout the Internet like a cancer.
This virtual book burning has caused entire businesses to be ruined or, at a minimum, harmed by the Big Data giants’ shadow-banning of their websites.  The war against the free speech of Conservatives is often invisible to all but the victims who daily witness the cyber burnings of their virtual books and libraries.  A list of impacted sites would include, but not be limited to, the following: Eagle RisingGodfather PoliticsConstitutionKeep and BeariPatriotBreitbart NewsThe Gateway PunditWestern Journalism, and Infowars.  The Gateway Pundit, the fourth most influential conservative news site (which has also published a partial list of its own regarding shadow-banned conservative sites), has reported that, in 2016, it “received nearly a third of its traffic from Facebook,” but that, in March of 2018, “Facebook blocked all traffic from recent stories to the website.”  Also, The Gateway Pundit is reportedly “shadow-banned by Google and frequently attacked and smeared by the liberal media.”  (Read more about this by clicking here: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/conservative-pufascism-in-action-here-is-the-tech-giant-purge-list-of-prominent-conservative-websitesrge-list/.)
Imagine the Internet is a huge library, and the websites are publishers of books to be checked out and read; but the books of intentionally targeted publishers and writers are being pulled off of shelves to be torched daily, on orders from the book-burning Zuckerbergs, Pages, and Dorseys who are literally following in the footsteps of Hitler and Goebbels.  It was Goebbels who once said, “This is the secret of propaganda: Those who are to be persuaded by it should be completely immersed in the ideas of the propaganda, without ever noticing that they are being immersed in it.”
A Side Note: Seven Sayings of Joseph Goebbels
Here are a few of the things that Goebbels said while he was in charge of Nazi propaganda (https://propagandaprinciples.wordpress.com/joseph-goebbels/): 1) Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting of their own free will; 2) Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play; 3) The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly—it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over; 4) Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred; 5) Not every item of news should be published; rather, those who control news policies must endeavor to make every item of news serve a certain purpose; 6) The truth is the greatest enemy of the State; 7) It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion.
These are the very precepts that Democrat propaganda outlets and social media embrace, even as they monopolize messaging by suppressing the ideas of their opposition.  Democrat media outlets always work in concert with one another; there are no dissenting voices, once their marching orders have been issued.  Their message is uniform and repetitive across media outlets, a surefire sign that they are all centrally controlled, with no diversity in their messaging and no permission to think freely.  A media culture where all are goose-stepping in conformity, the way 340 newspapers recently did, as they all published anti-Trump editorials on the very same day (https://start.att.net/news/read/category/news/article/newser-more_than_340_papers_publish_antitrump_editorials-rnewsernor), demonstrated a uniformity of thought that would have made Goebbels proud.
Big Data’s Book Burnings: Preserving the Traditions of Hitler’s Third Reich
What is Mark Zuckerberg, if not a high-tech book burner on a massive scale, a modern-day, real-life version of Ray Bradbury’s Captain Beatty?  (Captain Beatty is a fire chief and high-level book burner, in Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451.)  Being the cyber book burners that they are makes Zuckerberg and the other “Captain Beattys”—Larry Page, the CEO of Alphabet (Google et al.) and Jack Dorsey, the CEO of Twitter—much worse than mere Nazi sympathizers; for it is they who are daily ordering the high-tech book burnings, to the point that each of them has become a living embodiment of Joseph Goebbels (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_in_Nazi_Germany), wielding the propagandistic power (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda) of a weaponized virtual town square that holds the potential to create great harm to many on the taxpayer-created Internet they employ for their own selfish purposes.
The pyre of “book burnings” (by deletion or blocking) of conservative “books” (in the form of websites) has bloomed into a full-fledged Bibliocaust, directed not only against the ideas of religious Jews but against orthodox Christians and classically-liberal Constitutionalists (https://eaglerising.com/61556/why-liberal-democrats-are-walking-away-from-progressive-democrats-to-join-the-party-of-lincoln/) as well.  What all three of these strands of Western thought share in common is the belief that God wants people to be free to exercise their God-given Natural Rights, so that each person may be permitted to live in accord with his own conscience.  Free speech is a God-given right, according to the founding documents of the United States, and one thing that the oppressors of free people tend to share in common is that they idolize Big Government.  The large majority of activists seemingly do not believe in God or in the freedom that God wishes to bestow.
Judeo-Christian Traditions Are under Attack by the Censors of Social Media
Judeo-Christian religious practice prohibits lying, gossiping, and the making of false accusations (“Thou shalt not bear false witness”), and Jewish ethics state that the slanderous sin of lashon hara (literally “evil tongue”) kills three people whenever it is committed: 1) the speaker, or disseminator, of the gossip or slander; 2) the willing listener, who repeats what he has not witnessed but believes to be an interesting story; 3) the person spoken about, even if he does not deny the accusation (since many choose not to correct misinformation, based on the knowledge that doing so often just adds fuel to the flames).
Of course, it is permitted to warn a person who is about to engage in a business transaction with someone who is dishonest, if the warner has actually witnessed the dishonesty firsthand.  That is why the writer of this article—whose religious and political postings have been blocked, deleted, and shadow-banned—may speak out against the fascistic book-burning propagandists who run Facebook, Google, and Twitter, having had postings of his own articles deleted from, or blocked by, the social networks mentioned; also, searches on Google for many of this writer’s own articles have been blocked entirely or limited severely, with the exception of searches where exact titles of the articles are known or the author page of the publishing website is sought.
Why Burning a Book Is Like Killing a Human Being
Please consider the words of author Ray Bradbury on the subject of books-as-people; Bradbury has said (http://motlc.wiesenthal.com/site/pp.asp?c=gvKVLcMVIuG&b=395007), “[W]hen Hitler burned a book I [a lover of libraries] felt it as keenly, please forgive me, as his killing a human, for in the long sum of history they are one and the same flesh.  Mind or body, put to the oven, is a sinful practice, and I carried that with me. . . .”  Bradbury believed that censorship of any kind was highly destructive to freedom of thought.  Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 ends with the revelation that many burned books still exist in the minds of book lovers who have learned their favorites by heart (https://www.amazon.com/Fahrenheit-451-Ray-Bradbury/dp/B005WM71TY/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1535303917&sr=8-2), to save them for posterity and secure their teachings from the likes of the Captain Beattys—or the Mark Zuckerbergs—of the world: “They weren’t at all certain that the things they carried in their heads might make every future dawn glow with a purer light, they were sure of nothing save that the books were on file behind their quiet eyes, the books were waiting, with their pages uncut, for the customers who might come by in later years, some with clean and some with dirty fingers.”
Bradbury, a lifelong bibliophile, was truly in love with books and libraries, having shared the anecdote quite often with others that, unable to afford college, he embarked on a course of regular visitations to the library for ten years running, exposing himself widely to different styles of thinking and writing; and, after the decade of study was up, he graduated himself from the library (http://publiclibrariesonline.org/2013/05/i-graduated-from-the-library-an-interview-with-ray-bradbury/).  Bradbury understood that the reason the burning of books is so intimately connected with the burning of people is because both kinds of burning come from a sick desire of the censors to eliminate the sources of ideas that threaten the censors’ very existence.
Heinrich Heine knew what Ray Bradbury knew a century prior to Bradbury’s birth; Heine wrote the play Almansor, in the early 1820s, using it as the vehicle for teaching the world an important lesson about censorship, a lesson the German people had obviously forgotten by 1933, the year that German students—with their National Socialist professors looking on—burned books at least 93 times in 70 German cities (https://tapferimnirgendwo.com/2013/05/06/dort-wo-man-bucher-verbrennt/).  But Facebook, Google, and Twitter make Nazi university professors and their Hitler-inspired students look like pikers!  Ninety-three book burnings cannot hold a candle to the millions of articles and postings that are being “burned” daily by order of the Totalitarian Trio of Zuckerberg, Page, and Dorsey.  As I write this article, their murderous mischief continues, unabated.  Their socialist ideology cannot compete with the ideas of freedom, so they must kill libertarian ideas en masse.  Facebook, Google, and Twitter are their killing fields.
The Real Challenge for Book Burners: Freedom of Thought
And the danger does not stop there, for people whose pleasure it is to kill ideas will eventually turn to killing the people who write such ideas down in the first place.  Ray Bradbury illustrates this in Fahrenheit 451, as a manhunt is undertaken to track down and kill Guy Montag, a fireman who, although he has not written any books, has committed the cardinal sin of falling in love with books—which is just as dangerous!  Montag the fireman has quit the intellectual slavery of the collectivist plantation and has become Montag the freeman, an individual with his own ideas.  Montag has left behind the world of haters and killers of ideas and people; he has joined up with those who love liberty, who enjoy the right to think freely, to decide things on their own, and to solve problems for themselves.
The only reason to ban certain ideas is because they present too strong a challenge to the power the censors wield.  The Nazis in Germany had horrible ideas, destructive ideas, which—once all the opposing ideas had been banned and burned—found themselves without serious competition.  People were afraid to speak of the politically-incorrect ideas of rights and freedom, lest they be overheard and incarcerated by the Nazis.  And, of course, the National Socialists eventually instituted what they viewed as the Final Solution, as they resorted to the calamitous “burning,” or Holocaust, against the People of the Book—the Jews.  And the situation only grew worse, as other human beings with unpopular notions were also destroyed.
The Social Network That Was
Facebook was once a platform where people were free to express themselves—which is the way things ought to be, especially since Facebook profits by using the Internet infrastructure that everybody’s tax money built.  Facebook used to allow everyone a platform to share ideas, memories, photos, stories, news, humor, and opinions.  Many people invested a great deal of time and energy making their Facebook accounts into virtual photo albums, short story collections, or news galleries, sharing their ideas with each other.  All writers were welcome to post their articles and stories.
Ray Bradbury once said to a group of students, in the West Covina Library: “Always write for yourself, first and foremost, because if you don’t like it, how is anyone else going to like it?  And always fight for the right to express yourself, for that is who you are; and if you can’t be yourself, who else is going to express those ideas that are uniquely yours to express?  Who else is going to be you?  And who do you get to be, if not yourself?”  But the Zuckerbergs of this world do not want to allow people to express themselves freely; they do not want “you . . . to express those ideas that are uniquely yours to express.”  They do not care to answer Bradbury’s question: “Who else is going to be you?  And who do you get to be, if not yourself?”
Freedom Lovers Are Better than Book Burners
Nina Munteanu (https://ninamunteanu.me/2015/04/24/when-we-burn-books-ray-bradburys-fireman/) has written of Fahrenheit 451: “Bradbury wove a multi-layered political and social tale that followed one man’s journey to find his soul.  Fahrenheit 451 explores the theme of intellectual freedom using censorship as his plot device.  Montag is ‘everyman’ who must make a choice for personal freedom at the expense of the ‘good censored life.’  It is the choice all artists must make.  In choosing freedom, we make an obligation to respect and tolerate those with whom we disagree; otherwise we are just tyrants and not really free.”  Lovers of freedom are better than tyrannical book burners, because they choose life.  The lovers of liberty may not vanquish their intellectual foes by burning their published ideas and executing their living bodies.  Participating in such behavior would be to fall prey to the dilemma that Friedrich Nietzsche has warned against.  Wrote Nietzsche: “Whoever fights monsters must see to it that he does not become a monster himself.  And if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.” [“Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird.  Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein.”]
An Upbeat Message
Amid the death and destruction insinuated by the book burners of the Left, an upbeat outlook is needed to inspire people to continue fighting against the wickedness of social media.  (Here might be a good place to point out, however, that not all social media are evil; MeWe is actually an ethical and freedom-loving platform; to find out more about MeWe, click here: https://eaglerising.com/57060/conservatives-need-a-solution-to-facebook-as-november-2018-draws-near/).  Near the end of Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury offers hope through the voice of a character named Granger: “There was a silly damn bird called a Phoenix back before Christ, every few hundred years he built a pyre and burned himself up.  He must have been first cousin to Man.  But every time he burnt himself up he sprang out of the ashes, he got himself born all over again.  And it looks like we’re doing the same thing, over and over, but we’ve got one damn thing the Phoenix never had.  We know the damn silly thing we just did. . . .”  In other words, since we know what Hitler’s Nazis did in Germany in the 1930s and 1940s, we have a chance at stopping Zuckerberg’s Nazis in America in 2018.
The civil war which the Left has chosen to wage—by means of a virtual book burning whose flames are burning so high that a critical mass of people is beginning to notice—is not over yet.  But with the president shedding light on what is really happening in the country, the word is finally getting out.  CNN has largely been discredited, with Home & Garden Televisionand The Discovery Channel now beating CNN in the ratings (http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/03/cnn-loses-hgtv-ratings/).  This is bad news for Team Bibliocaust.  But it is good news for Team America.  In the meantime, with regard to censorship, President Trump has said, “Speaking loudly and clearly for the Trump Administration, we won’t let that happen.  Censorship is a very dangerous thing and absolutely impossible to police.  Let everybody participate, good and bad, and we will all just have to figure it out!”  Trump’s statement (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-slams-social-media-companies-for-censorship-of-the-right-2018-08-18-131034641) is positive, reflecting the president’s trust in the people’s ability to solve problems, including the problem of deciding who to believe and who to distrust.  There is not a hint of the book-burner mentality anywhere in Trump’s statement.  Ray Bradbury once said, “I wrote Fahrenheit 451 not to predict the future, but to prevent it.”  It has become more than obvious that President Trump—a kindred spirit with regard to his desire to prevent tyranny—has a similar goal in mind.
Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement

Culture

De Blasio Suggests Ban On Public Gatherings Like Parades Or Fairs… But BLM Protests Are Different

Published

on

By

De Blasio Suggests Ban On Public Gatherings Like Parades Or Fairs... But BLM Protests Are Different

NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio suggested on CNN that gatherings such as normal parades and fairs would be restricted in his city, but Black Lives Matter protests would not be shut down.

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio: “Look, Wolf, this is always an area of real sensitivity. If you’re just talking about health, we would always say, ‘Hey, folks, you know, stay home if you can.’ But we understand at this moment in history, people are talking about the need for historic changes. I mean, today, in New York City, recognizing the power and the meaning of the message Black Lives Matter, which we did in front of Trump Tower today, this is a historic moment of change; we have to respect that, but also say to people, the kinds of gatherings we’re used to – the parades, the fairs – we just can’t have that while we’re focusing on health right now.”

TDW:

On Thursday, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio suggested on CNN that gatherings such as normal parades and fairs would be restricted in his city, but Black Lives Matter protests would not be shut down.

On Thursday, de Blasio helped paint a Black Lives Matter mural in front of Trump Tower in Manhattan, and yelled, “We are saying Black Lives Matter in New York City and Black Lives Matter in the United States of America! Let’s show Donald Trump what he does not understand; let’s paint it right in front of his building for him!” Later, the mayor appeared on CNN with host Wolf Blitzer, who asked him, “What about protests? If people want to march down Fifth Avenue, are they going to be allowed to do so?” More

Sickening the hypocrisy from the left. Nothing more Democratic than pretending to care about the black communities while simultaneously destroying them. They don’t care about your health and nether does the MSM. Nothing they do is healthy for the well being of hard-working Americans. Unbelievable that there are so many people in this great country that can’t see through their political BS.

Continue Reading

Culture

Stanford ‘Supports Human Rights,’ But Takes $58 Million From Most Abusive Nation on Earth China

California’s Stanford is the happy recipient of $58 million in funds from China, one of the worst human rights abusers in the world.

Published

on

Even as it pretends that it is supportive of “human rights,” California’s Stanford University is the happy recipient of $58 million in funds from China, one of the worst human rights abusers in the world.

The College Fix reminds us of Stanford’s blatant, anti-American hypocrisy.

At a San Francisco gala in March 2014, Stanford University President John Hennessy accepted an award for the school’s “Advancement in U.S.-China Relations.”

The award was granted by the Committee of 100, a group of Chinese Americans in business, government, academia and the arts, and the school boasted about it on its website.

Stanford began accepting Chinese graduate students back in the 1970s. In 2009, the school signed a contract to open a Chinese government-funded Confucius Institute, with the goal of promoting Chinese culture and language. In 2012, under Hennessy’s oversight, the Stanford Center at Peking University opened, billed as a “hub” for Stanford students in China.

Along with the school’s close relationship with the Red Chinese, Stanford took $58.1 million from China during the period of 2014 to 2020.

“Hypocrisy is the price of funding from China,” National Association of Scholars Policy Director Rachelle Peterson told College Fix.

“Colleges and universities declare themselves protectors of human rights and a safe place for the vulnerable. Yet they embrace the Chinese Communist Party and are complicit in the stifling of free speech,” he added.

Meanwhile, On May 1, the National Association of Scholars sent to Congress a list of 86 Chinese-sponsored Confucius Institutes attached to American universities, including six that were set to close in the summer of 2020. In March, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) issued a warning to universities that Confucius Institutes were “fronts for Chinese propaganda.”

The FBI also warned that these associations act as a means for Chinese spies to walk right in and steal the research that U.S. universities conduct.

“They can also provide an opportunity to spot, assess, and befriend fellow STEM students or researchers who might assist—either wittingly or unwittingly—in passing your research and development to a foreign adversary,” the FBI added.

Congress should seriously consider making these associations illegal.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Culture

Seattle Held ‘Segregated’ Training Session On ‘Undoing Whiteness,’ Encouraging Staffers To Forfeit ‘Guaranteed Physical Safety’

Published

on

By

Seattle held a ‘segregated’ training session on ‘undoing whiteness,’ encouraging staffers to forfeit ‘guaranteed physical safety.’

Christopher Rufo, an editor for City Journal and director of the Discovery Institute’s Center on Wealth and Poverty, said he filed a public records request regarding the training session. On Monday, he published copies of the materials distributed to employees in the session on his Twitter account.

According to his screenshots, the Office of Civil Rights hosted a two-and-a-half-hour “Training on Internalized Racial Superiority for White People.”

Fox News:

The City of Seattle held a racially segregated employee training session aimed at White staffers and instructing them on “undoing your own whiteness” in order to be held accountable by people of color, according to documents obtained by a public records request.

The session took place on June 12, as protesters took part in the so-called “Capitol Hill Organized Protest” in the Capitol Hill district.

One handout distributed in the session reportedly declared how “racism is not our fault but we are responsible.” Another said White staffers must give up “the land” and their “guaranteed physical safety” in order to be an “accomplice” for racial justice.

More
Continue Reading

Culture

Protesters Storm Baptist Church, Harass Children, Assault Parishioners (Video)

Disgusting.

Published

on

By

Protesters Storm Baptist Church, Harass Children, Assault Parishioners (Video)

Black Lives Matters protesters have been threatening and harassing attendees of Grace Baptist Church as they enter the building for the past few weeks.

Video footage shows no one is safe from harassment regardless of age or race. There is also a video of these leftwing BLM agitators entering the sanctuary to disrupt church services.

Daily Wire:

Videos posted on social media show parishioners, both black and white, being harassed and physically assaulted at Grace Baptist Church in Troy, New York.

The protesters, repeatedly shouting “Black Lives Matter,” even harassed and blocked churchgoers while they were with their young children, using a megaphone to scream at the families, shaming and threatening their parents with calls to CPS, or Child Protective Services.

The assaults, harassment, and protesting have been occurring since at least the end of June, according to the viral videos posted online. The church has refused to close or backdown, directing men from the parish to help escort fellow worshipers inside as they are blocked by BLM protesters.

Grace Baptist Church made headlines last month for giving away an AR-15 as a prize for a church raffle. When the giveaway was first reported, Pastor John Koletas told WNYT that the church held it in solidarity with hunters and gun owners who have been “viciously attacked by anti-Christian socialist policies.” One local critic told WRGB at the time that the giveaway exhibited “extreme poor taste,” citing “all of the shootings going on in all of our communities.” More

Where is their mayor? Governor? They need to stop this insanity. People have a right to protest but not to be able to go into churches and harass and assault people.

Continue Reading

Culture

BLM Protester Punches Trump Supporter Right In Front Of Police

Published

on

By

BLM Protester Punches Trump Supporter Right In Front Of Police

BLM protester punched a Trump supporter in the face then is immediately arrested. Things are getting hostile at BLM plaza.

Now the second guy is going to jail for trying to hit a cop to stop the first guy from being taken away.

Continue Reading

Culture

‘Hamilton’ Musical Once Praised, Now Slammed by Wokesters for Celebrating American Founders

The wokesters are now out the cancel celebrated rap musical ‘Hamilton.”

Published

on

Only five years ago the rap musical Hamilton was praised as high art and an important achievement. But now, the Black Lives Matter haters are slamming the musical for daring to lionize the founding fathers.

When Lin-Manuel Miranda unveiled Hamilton in 2015, he was hailed as a genius and celebrated for bringing the history of the founding to a new generation of people.

But now he is already being attacked for the play. Why? because he wrote his play about the founders who today’s Black Lives Matter terrorists want to see destroyed, not celebrated in a play.

First of all, before we get to the fools attacking the play today, we must dispense with this idiotic claim that Hamilton is anything but fake history created with racism at its heart — anti-white racism.

Miranda’s play is not “history.” It is garbage. The fact that he puts blacks in the roles of white men is absurd. And rap is not music, anyway, so let’s get beyond all this nonsense that Hamilton is important art. It is woke garbage not worth being celebrated.

But, even if those who have been celebrating it since 2015 were right that it is a great piece of work, Hamilton has already become the newest thing to cancel by anti-American, woke activists.

Over the July 4th weekend, Hamilton began trending on Twitter as BLM wokesters began attacking it for daring to say that America’s founding was a good thing.

As The Blaze reported:

“Are y’all ready to talk about how problematic Hamilton is? Lin Manuel Miranda created a piece of work that used hip hop (a genre created by black people) to tell the story of colonizers and slave owners,” one Twitter user wrote.

“As much as I love the show, it and it’s writer are deeply problematic,” another wrote. “I’ve intentionally or unintentionally ignored these things for years, but I’m trying to fix this now so I can fully contextualize and understand Hamilton and it’s effect as a whole.”

“Hamilton is deeply problematic in concept and so is Lin Manuel Miranda to some degree,” another person tweeted.

“I mean I think the fact that a musical like Hamilton (which is deeply problematic and nationalist) has to exist in order for non-white actors to have a space on Broadway is just very indicative of how non-white stories will never be able to thrive on this elitist medium,” another person said.

“Reminder for all y’all Hamilton watching mofos: Hamilton was a racist slaveowner, and casting POC as white bigots isn’t the reclamation you think it is,” read a tweet that had nearly 60,000 likes. “It’s a romanticized telling of a white man’s plights, so none of y’all better be stanning the founding fathers AGAIN.”

First they came for Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. Now they are coming after Lin-Manuel Miranda.

You reap what you sow, liberals.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Culture

Six Black Children Murdered in Violence Over Weekend — Black Lives Matter Silent

At least half a dozen black children were shot down in black neighborhoods over the Fourth of July holiday.

Published

on

Home Invasion

At least half a dozen black children were shot down in black neighborhoods over the Fourth of July holiday, and yet Black Lives Matter is utterly silent.

Black children were murdered in Washington D.C. Chicago, and San Francisco over the weekend. But no one on the left seems to care even a tiny bit.

Per the Daily Wire:

In Washington, DC, 11-year-old Davon McNeal was preparing to leave a Fourth of July cookout with his mother when shooting broke out somewhere nearby. A bullet struck the youth football player in the head, killing him, according to The Washington Post.

“We just had a real genuine kid who wanted to get out of the neighborhood. That’s all he said is, ‘I’m gonna make it,’” McNeal’s football coach Kevin McGill said remembering the boy’s dreams of playing in the pros. “These kids’ lives are being robbed over nothing.”

Just under 90 people have been killed in Washington, DC this year, a roughly 17% increase over last year. 2019 ended with the most people killed in the city in a decade.

D.C. was not the only Democrat-led city to see a child murdered.

In Atlanta, 8-year-old Secoriea Turner was killed. Thirty others were killed in Atlanta that weekend, too.

Moving west, in Chicago 7-year-old Natalia Wallace and a 14-year-old boy whose name has not yet been released were murdered.

Next up, in Hoover, Ala., 8-year-old Royta Giles Jr. was killed in the city.

Finally, a 6-year-old boy was shot and killed in San Francisco’s Bayview neighborhood.

So, have you heard Black Lives Matter lament these murders?

Nope.

One man from Atlanta took BLM to task over the 8-year old killed there.

“If this was a white police officer gunning down three blacks and injuring four, Wilson High School would be set on fire and every black leader, every community leader, would be up here,” the man told reporters. “Black Lives Matter, hands up. Blacks have murdered other blacks every 32 hours since June. I’ve been in this town all my life, I’m 56 years old, I am afraid of being shot and gunned down by a black man.”

“Again if this was a white police officer shooting and killing three blacks, people will be out here, the school will be on fire, people will be coming forward saying, ‘I saw this white police officer,’” he continued. “But because it’s black on black crime, it’s socially acceptable for blacks not to talk to The police. It is appalling. Every 32 hours since June, blacks have been murdering blacks, and you all have to do a better job.”

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Facebook at: facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider


Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!
 
Send this to a friend