Connect with us

Climate Change

9th Circuit Court Of Appeals Deals A Blow To Teens Who Sued Trump Over Climate Change

It’s nice the 9th Circuit is not what it used to be!

Published

on

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals threw the “children’s climate lawsuit,” ruling the effort to force the federal government to take action on climate policy falls under the purview of the legislative and executive branches, not the judiciary.

“The panel reluctantly concluded that the plaintiffs’ case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large. The political branches might conclude—however inappropriately in the plaintiffs’ view—that economic or defense considerations called for the continuation of the very programs challenged in this suit.”

Anyone who says President Trump’s historic judicial appointments are not game-changers must be certifiably insane.

Daily Caller:

Trending: Elizabeth Warren Refuses To Recognize Jerusalem As Israel’s Capital: Still Need To “Determine The Capital”

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in California ruled Friday that children do not have standing to sue the Trump administration and the federal government for not adequately addressing climate change.

Climate policy comes under the purview of Congress and the president, not the court system, the U.S. Court of Appeals decided in a split decision. Attorneys for the teenagers can ask the U.S. Supreme Court to allow the trial to continue in Oregon, where it was initially filed. More

Real loss builds character so maybe they’ll finally benefit from the real world where no participation trophies are handed out to the losers.

The US occupies a small piece of the planet, compared to China, Russia, Africa, and South America. We lead the world in cutting emissions. Why do these ‘teens’ think that doing more in our small piece of real estate that would have a significant economic impact is going to save the world?

I would like these kids to explain to me why Mars is gaining more oxygen and why the Red Spot on Jupiter might completely dissipate in another generation. Then explain to me the correlation with solar activity. But these questions are hard and would require real thought. 

Don't forget to Like The Washington Sentinel on Facebook and Twitter, and visit our friends at The Republican Legion.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Washington Sentinel email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Advertisement

Climate Change

Pew Poll: Americans Put ‘Climate Change’ At Bottom of Priority List

A new Pew poll finds that American voters don’t really much care about global warming, and it is way down on the list of priorities.

Published

on

A new Pew poll finds that American voters don’t really much care about the left’s religion of global warming, and it is way down on the list of priorities.

Liberals continue making mythical climate change a central point of their political agenda. They are going to save the earth, doncha know.

But this new Pew poll is not good news for the left. If they keep focusing on climate change, they are doing so to the exclusion of appealing to what their voters care about, it appears.

Worse for the left, the voters don’t just find climate change low on their list of things to care about, it ranks almost at the very bottom. Out of 18 issues, climate change ranks 17th!

But this isn’t anything new. In fact, the Democrats have been ignoring this warning sign for more than a decade.

Pew has been asking this question since 2007 and the voters haven’t cared about global warming since day one. According to Pew, whether the issue is called “global warming” or “climate change,” it never ranks higher than third from the bottom. And sometimes it ranked at the very bottom.

Pew conducts the poll monthly asking respondents about their list of priorities.

According to the latest list, here are the priorities:

1. Strengthening the economy (70%)

2. Reducing health-care costs (69%)

3. The education system (68%)

4. Defending the country from future terrorist attacks (67%)

5. Taking steps to make the Social Security system financially sound (67%)

6. Taking steps to make the Medicare system financially sound (67%)

7. Dealing with the problems of poor and needy people (60%)

8. Protecting the environment (56%)

9. Dealing with the issue of immigration (51%)

10. Improving the job situation (50%)

11. Reducing crime (50%)

12. Dealing with drug addiction (49%)

13. Reducing the budget deficit (48%)

14. Addressing race relations in this country (46%)

15. Strengthening the U.S. military (45%)

16. Improving the country’s roads, bridges and public transportation systems (45%)

17. Dealing with global climate change (44%)

18. Dealing with global trade issues (39%)

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Climate Change

New Jersey Forcing Builders to Add ‘Climate Change’ to Plans to Win Construction Permits

New Jersey has taken a step toward making sure no one starts new construction by forcing builders to take climate change.

Published

on

New Jersey has taken a step toward making sure no one commissions new construction in the state by forcing builders to take climate change, including rising sea levels, into account to win government approval and permits for new construction projects.

New Jersey Gov. Philip D. Murphy announced on Monday that no new construction will be allowed building permits unless the project’s impact on climate change is factored into the plans.

This new requirement will likely add thousands, tens of thousands, or even millions to the cost of projects as builders are forced to hire outside companies to assess the so-called “impact on climate change” their projects might incur.

Pandering to far-left, globaloney believers, Murphy celebrated his move saying, “This is not abstract for us. This is real. The dangers are there.”

“New Jersey’s initiative is believed to be the broadest, and most specific, attempt to leverage land-use rules to control where and what developers can build, and to limit the volume of emissions that are spewed into the air,” the New York Times reported.

“It gives us the ability to say no, or to say, ‘You have to do it differently,’” said Kathleen Frangione, the governor’s chief policy adviser, the paper added.

This is not a law, though. The new requirements are being forced on the building trade by the gov’s executive order, which will require the state Department of Environmental Protection to draw up new regulations by January of 2022.

Some lawmakers, though, feel that Murphy is overstepping his role.

“Phil Murphy might be forgetting that we still make the laws,” Assemblyman and the Republican minority leader, Jon Bramnick said. He went on adding that the proposal was certain to have a chilling effect on business growth. “If he’s going to roll out something that’s going to stop development in New Jersey, that calls for serious legislative hearings.”

Of course, the biggest problem is that there is no actual science that can be used to draft these new rules. All of this will just be based on wild speculation, unproven science, and political partisanship.

In the end, this nonsense will simply put a dampener on new construction in New Jersey. What few state Republicans there are left in the state are right. This rule sill simply put an end to growth in New Jersey.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Climate Change Experts Say Trump is Right That California’s Wildfires are Fault of Liberal Policies

Climate change experts recently agreed with President Donald Trump’s contention that California’s wildfires are a result of failed leftist land management policies.

Published

on

Climate change experts recently agreed with President Donald Trump’s contention that California’s wildfires are a result of failed leftist land management policies instead of climate change.

As Daily Caller reported:

Roughly 75% of damage stemming from California’s wildfires was a result of “the way we manage lands and develop our landscape,” Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at the University of California, Berkeley, said Wednesday at a conference in Washington.

It is also known that wildfires used to destroy up to 4.5 million acres a year of California’s countryside back in the 1800s. “Fire was almost as important as rain to ecosystems,” Stephens said.

Stephens is not the only researcher at the National Council for Science and the Environment who has essentially proven Trump to be correct in his assessment that global warming is not the simple cause of California’s wildfires.

Jennifer Montgomery, director of the California Forest Management Task Force, also recently said that “Wildfire is not really wildfire — it’s not pointy green trees. You get these so-called wildfires at intersection of development.”

The president has made similar claims.

“There is no reason for these massive, deadly and costly forest fires in California except that forest management is so poor,” the president tweeted in September.

However, leftists continue to claim that the sole reason for the wildfires is global warming.

“The cost associated with firefighting is increasing dramatically, hitting a record $1.1 billion in 2017. The president signed Fire Funding Fix legislation in 2018 to give federal agencies $2.25 billion to fight fires starting in 2020. That amount would increase to nearly $3 billion by 2027,” Daily Caller added.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Glacier National Park Quietly Removes Signs That Say Glaciers Will be Gone by 2020

Montana’s Glacier National Park is quietly removing signs that said its glaciers would be melted by 2020, mostly because, well, the glaciers are still right there.

Published

on

Montana’s Glacier National Park is quietly removing signs that said its glaciers would be melted by 2020, mostly because, well, the glaciers are still right there.

The Park’s spokeswoman, Gina Kurzmen, told the press that the signs that were added more than a decade ago when global warming advocates first began claiming that all ice caps and glaciers would be gone by now.

The new signs will still push the global warming myth but will feature cagier language.

“When they will completely disappear depends on how and when we act. One thing is consistent: the glaciers in the park are shrinking,” the new signs read.

According to the Washington times:

The U.S. Geological Survey informed the park in 2017 that the glaciers were no longer expected to melt so quickly due to changes in the forecast model, Ms. Kurzmen told CNN.

Indeed, time and again scientists are simply wrong with their catastrophic predictions of globaloney.

For instance, last year a key glacier in Greenland was found to be growing again after shrinking for several years, according to NASA.

“The Jakobshavn (YA-cob-shawv-en) glacier around 2012 was retreating about 1.8 miles (3 kilometers) and thinning nearly 130 feet (almost 40 meters) annually,” the Associated Press reported. “But it started growing again at about the same rate in the past two years, according to a study in Monday’s Nature Geoscience. Study authors and outside scientists think this is temporary.”

“That was kind of a surprise. We kind of got used to a runaway system,” said Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland ice and climate scientist Jason Box, the AP noted. “The good news is that it’s a reminder that it’s not necessarily going that fast. But it is going.”

Box added, “arguably the most important Greenland glacier because it discharges the most ice in the northern hemisphere. For all of Greenland, it is king.”

Scientists say that the cooling in the North Atlantic waters caused the glacier to begin growing again.

“The water in Disko Bay, where Jakobshavn hits the ocean, is about 3.6 degrees cooler (2 degrees Celsius) than a few years ago, study authors said,” the AP added.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Australia’s Bushfires Mostly Caused by Arson, NOT Global Warming

Nearly every news outlet out there is pushing the fake news that the destructive Australian bushfires are the result of climate change, but the real cause is arson.

Published

on

Nearly every media outlet out there is pushing the fake news that the huge number of destructive Australian bushfires is the result of climate change, but one of the main causes seems to be arson.

It is currently summer in Australia and summertime is bushfire season.

But this year the number of those fires has grown considerably. Naturally, radical leftists were quick to blame the mythical “climate change” for the increase.

However, Australian authorities are claiming that there is a far different, more down-to-earth cause for these fires. Criminals.

According to Breitbart News, up to 180 people have been arrested and charged with arson.

Australian police investigating the bushfires have arrested more than 180 alleged arsonists in the past few months. But apparently, they forgot to send the memo to Russell Crowe and Cate Blanchett, both of whom insisted in their Golden Globes acceptance speeches that the Australian bushfires were in fact caused by ‘climate change.’

Police arrested 183 people for lighting bushfires across Queensland, NSW, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania in the past few months. NSW police data shows 183 people have been charged or cautioned for bushfire-related offences since November 8, and 24 arrested for deliberately starting bushfires.

Australia has suffered a heartrending spate of bushfires that have displaced hundreds of people and killed and injured tens of thousands of animals. Many are blaming climate change for this year’s disaster, but the truth is, failed liberal forestry practices are far more to blame for the fires than environmental conditions.

Thus far, more than 20 people have been killed by these massive bushfires that have engulfed over 15 million acres in flames. There are also several people missing and more than 1,300 houses have been destroyed.

Above and beyond the actual fires, the huge wall of smoke generated has had even wider impact. The smoke has been so bad that the sky in nearby New Zealand was turned orange.

Naturally, the pushers of the religion of climate change have put on their sack cloth and ashes and have proclaimed the end of the earth… again.

To name just a few, the left-wing Atlantic wrung its hands and proclaimed that climate change will soon make Australia uninhabitable by man. CBS insisted that the bushfires are worse because of climate change. And Time magazine insisted that Australia is an evil, evil place because it is “one of the world’s highest per capita carbon dioxide emitters.”

On and on it goes.

Aside from the arsons, there is another cause other than climate change for the fires.

But according to scientist and bushfire expert David Packham AO, this is all wrong. Climate change is not at fault for these bushfires. Left-wingers with their failed green environmental policies are who we should look to blame.

Packham says, “The forest and alpine environment will decay and be damaged possibly beyond repair and home and people [will be] incinerated,” Caldron Pool writer Ben Davis reported.

“Fuel levels are at their highest since European settlement and that’s something Mr Packham attributed to ‘misguided green ideology,’ vested interests, political failure and mismanagement,” Davis noted.

“I was terribly surprised when they put out this line that the fires are due to climate change when everybody who knows anything about the principles and a little bit of the science of bushfire behaviour knows that is not the case. It is… the fuel,” Packham recently said.

“I was terribly surprised because they are very experienced people. They’re right at the top of the tree and to hear what came from them… has left me absolutely startled that people who– if that is what they really believe, you can’t imagine why they are in the position they are in.

“And I can’t believe that they’re saying things they didn’t believe just to push a sort of semi-religious myth about climate change,” he added.

According to Packham, the science is undeniable. The ferocity of the fire is determined by the amount of fuel and the amount of fuel determines the rate at which the fire moves. Since fuel levels have climbed to their most dangerous level in thousands of years, a blaze of this magnitude is to be expected.

Once again, the global warming fanatics are using failed liberal policies to push their fantasy of climate change.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Disaster: Australia’s Massive Bushfires Have Little to do With Climate Change

Australia has suffered a heartrending spate of bushfires that have displaced hundreds of people and killed and injured millions of animals.

Published

on

Australia has suffered a heartrending spate of bushfires that have displaced hundreds of people and killed and injured tens of thousands of animals. Many are blaming climate change for this year’s disaster, but the truth is, failed liberal forestry practices are far more to blame for the fires than environmental conditions.

Thus far, more than 20 people have been killed by these massive bushfires that have engulfed over 15 million acres in flames. There are also several people missing and more than 1,300 houses have been destroyed.

Above and beyond the actual fires, the huge wall of smoke generated has had even wider impact. The smoke has been so bad that the sky in nearby New Zealand was turned orange.

Naturally, the pushers of the religion of climate change have put on their sack cloth and ashes and have proclaimed the end of the earth… again.

To name just a few, the left-wing Atlantic wrung its hands and proclaimed that climate change will soon make Australia uninhabitable by man. CBS insisted that the bushfires are worse because of climate change. And Time magazine insisted that Australia is an evil, evil place because it is “one of the world’s highest per capita carbon dioxide emitters.”

On and on it goes.

But according to scientist and bushfire expert David Packham AO, this is all wrong. Climate change is not at fault for these bushfires. Left-wingers with their failed green environmental policies are who we should look to blame.

Packham says, “The forest and alpine environment will decay and be damaged possibly beyond repair and home and people [will be] incinerated,” Caldron Pool writer Ben Davis reported.

“Fuel levels are at their highest since European settlement and that’s something Mr Packham attributed to ‘misguided green ideology,’ vested interests, political failure and mismanagement,” Davis noted.

“I was terribly surprised when they put out this line that the fires are due to climate change when everybody who knows anything about the principles and a little bit of the science of bushfire behaviour knows that is not the case. It is… the fuel,” Packham recently said.

“I was terribly surprised because they are very experienced people. They’re right at the top of the tree and to hear what came from them… has left me absolutely startled that people who– if that is what they really believe, you can’t imagine why they are in the position they are in.

“And I can’t believe that they’re saying things they didn’t believe just to push a sort of semi-religious myth about climate change,” he added.

According to Packham, the science is undeniable. The ferocity of the fire is determined by the amount of fuel and the amount of fuel determines the rate at which the fire moves. Since fuel levels have climbed to their most dangerous level in thousands of years, a blaze of this magnitude is to be expected.

Once again, the global warming fanatics are using failed liberal policies to push their fantasy of climate change.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Climate Change

Teen Global Warming Princess Greta Thunberg Apologizes for Saying World Leaders Should be Executed

The left’s favorite, distempered teenager, Greta “Ice Princess” Thunberg, apologize for saying she wanted to execute politicians.

Published

on

The left’s favorite, distempered teenager, Greta “Ice Princess” Thunberg, has been forced to apologize for saying that the world’s politicians need to be put “against the wall” and apparently gunned down and executed.

Thunberg apologized after many critics became shocked that she was advocating for violence against politicians.

“Yesterday I said we must hold our leaders accountable and unfortunately said ‘put them against the wall.’ That’s Swenglish: ‘att ställa någon mot väggen’ (to put someone against the wall) means to hold someone accountable,” Thunberg exclaimed on Twitter on Saturday. “That’s what happens when you…”

“… improvise speeches in a second language. But, of course I apologise if anyone misunderstood this. I cannot enough express the fact that I – as well as the entire school strike movement- are against any possible form of violence. It goes without saying but I say it anyway,” she concluded.

According to The Hill, the fascist little teenager was in Turin, Italy, to protest Italy’s refusal to continue ramping up carbon emissions curbs.

During her address, Thunberg went after the world’s politicians for not bowing to her religious global warming demands.

“We have to make sure that they cannot do that,” she said. “We will make sure they, that we put them against the wall, and that they will have to do their job and to protect our futures,” she said.

Of course, “put them against a wall” means to execute them if they don’t bow to her will.

Her little “explanation” where she was trying to hide behind some mysterious Swedish idiom is a ruse.

She meant that we need to start gunning down everyone who doesn’t follow her rules.

She is no different than any other fascist.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on facebook.com/Warner.Todd.Huston.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider


Best of the Month

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!

Send this to a friend